Pediatric Robotic (Infant, Pre-pubertal, and Teenager) Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

  • Yoshiyuki Kojima
  • Pasquale CasaleEmail author
Part of the Current Clinical Urology book series (CCU)


Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is characterized by a functionally significant impairment of urinary transport caused by an intrinsic or an extrinsic obstruction in the area where the ureter joins the renal pelvis. This results in the gradual dilatation of the renal collecting system (hydronephrosis) and may lead to deterioration of renal function and pain. Therefore, the main goals of treatment are the preservation of renal function and the relief of symptoms.


Robot Laparoscopy Pyeloplasty Children Ureteropelvic junction obstruction 


  1. 1.
    Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995;153:1962–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Piaggio LA, Franc-Guimond J, Noh PH, Wehry M, Figueroa TE, Barthold J, González R. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol. 2007;178:1579–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ravish IR, Nerli RB, Reddy MN, Amarkhed SS. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children. J Endourol. 2007 21:897–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peters C Laparoscopy in pediatric urology: adoption of innovative technology. BJU Int. 2003;92:52–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peters CA. Robotic assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Pediatr Endosurg Innovative Tech. 2003;7:403–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grattan-Smith JD, Jones RA. MR urography: technique and results for the evaluation of urinary obstruction in the pediatric population. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am. 2008;16:643–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirsch AJ, McMann LP, Jones RA, Smith EA, Scherz HC, Grattan-Smith JD. Magnetic resonance urography for evaluating outcomes after pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2006;176:1755-1761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Casale P. A review of pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. UIJ. 2009;2. doi:10.3834/uij.1944-5784. Accessed 09 Dec 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kutikov A, Resnick M, Casale P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the infant younger than 6 months – is it technically possible? J Urol. 2006;175:1477–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neheman A, Noh PH, Piaggio L, González R. The role of laparoscopic surgery for urinary tract reconstruction in infants weighing less than 10 kg: a comparison with open surgery. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:192–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Metzelder ML, Schier F, Petersen C, Truss M, Ure BM. Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age. J Urol. 2006;175: 688–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, Canter D, Casale P. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. J Urol. 2006;176:2237–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thakre AA, Bailly Y, Sun LW, Van Meer F, Yeung CK. Is smaller workspace a limitation for robot performance in laparoscopy? J Urol. 2008;179:1138–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol. 2008;26:539–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Bloom DA, Bogaert GA, Jordon GH, Kogan BA, Peters CA. Postoperative adhesion formation after urological laparoscopy in the pediatric population. J Urol. 1995 153:792–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR, Lowe GJ. Which is better—retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children? J Urol. 2007 178:1791–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;174:1440–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, Rodriguez E, Eichel L, Rajpoot D. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology. 2006;67:599–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, Peters CA. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol. 2006;175:683–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience. J Urol 2007;178:2137–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romero FR, Wagner AA, Trapp C, Permpongkosol S, Muntener M, Link RE, Kavoussi LR. Transmesenteric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2006;176:2526–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF. Robotics in pediatric urology: pyeloplasty. In: Wilcox DT, Godbole RP, Koyle MA, editors. Pediatric: surgical complication and management. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2008: 145–51.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mesrobian HG. Bypass pyeloplasty: description of a procedure and initial results. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5:34–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Casale P, Grady RW, Joyner BD, Zeltser IS, Figueroa TE, Mitchell ME. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient. J Endourol. 2004;18:875–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ganesh A, Kim A, Casale P, Cucchiaro G. Low-dose intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in children. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:271–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Freilich DA, Houck CS, Meier PM, Passerotti CC, Retik AB, Nguyen HT. The effectiveness of aerosolized intraperitoneal bupivacaine in reducing postoperative pain in children undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:337–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM. Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 2004;171:2629–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Franco I, Dyer LL, Zelkovic P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient: hand sewn anastomosis versus robotic assisted anastomosis—is there a difference? J Urol. 2007;178:1483–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM, Adams MC, Pope JC 4th, Brock JW 3rd. Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review. J Urol. 2005;174:2363–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Bägli DJ, Keays M, Farhat WA, Khoury AE, Salle JL. Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort. J Urol. 2008;180:1684–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, Dave S, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE, Pippi Salle JL, Farhat WA. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2007;178:2571–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Piaggio LA, Noh PH, González R. Reoperative laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol. 2007;177:1878–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Passerotti CC, Nguyen HT, Eisner BH, Lee RS, Peters CA. Laparoscopic reoperative pediatric pyeloplasty with robotic assistance. J Endourol. 2007;21:1137–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hemal AK, Mishra S, Mukharjee S, Suryavanshi M. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair. Int J Urol. 2008;15:744–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Atug F, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R. Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:9–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brito AH, Mitre AI, Srougi M. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary obstruction. J Endourol. 2007;21:1481–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rehman J, Landman J, Sundaram C, Clayman RV. Missed anterior crossing vessels during open retroperitoneal pyeloplasty: laparoscopic transperitoneal discovery and repair. J Urol. 2001;166:593–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Casale P, Mucksavage P, Resnick M, Kim SS. Robotic ureterocalicostomy in the pediatric population. J Urol. 2008;180:2643–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of UrologyThe Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Nephro-UrologyNagoya City University Graduate School of Medical SciencesNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Division of UrologyThe Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations