Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

  • 751 Accesses

Abstract

A laparoscopic procedure is similar to flying a commercial plane. There is the captain (surgeon), co-pilot (assistant), and crew (anesthesia, scrub nurse, and circulator). Each works simultaneously performing distinct tasks leading to one goal. Both rely heavily on technology and require careful and thorough preparation prior to embarking. Similarly, like the captain of a plane, the surgeon is ultimately responsible for the outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Crist DW, Gadacz TR. Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery Clinics of North America. 73:265–289, 1993.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baadsgaard SE, Bille S, Egebald K. Major vascular injuries during gynecologic surgery. ACATA Obstet Gynecol Scand. 68:283–285, 1989.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Champault G, Cazacu F, Taffinder N. Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6(5):367–370, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pemberton RJ, Tolley DA, van Velthoven RF. Prevention and management of complications in urological laparoscopic port placement. Eur Urol. 50:958–968, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. VOnlineancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H et al. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1311 procedures at a single center. J Urol. 168(1):23–26, 2002 Jul.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yim SF, Yuen PM. Randomized double-masked comparison of radiOnliney expanding access device and conventional cutting tip trocar in laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 97(3):435–438, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lam TY, Lee SW, So HS. Kwok SP. RadiOnliney expanding trocar: a less painful alternative for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 10(5):269–273, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhoyrul S, Payne J, Steffes B et al. A randomized prospective study of radiOnliney expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 4:392–397, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shalhav AL, Barret E, Lifshitz DA et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery using blunt 12-mm trocar without fascial closure. J Endourol. 16(1):43–46, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J et al. Laparoscopic surgery complications associated with trocar tip design: review of literature and own results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 9:135–140, 1999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. String A, Berber E, Foroutani A, Macho JR, Pearl JM, Siperstein AE. Use of the optical trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 15(6):570–573, 2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marcovich R, Del Terzo MA, Wolf JS Jr. Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic access technique: optiview visualizing trocar and Veress needle. J Endourol. 14(2):175–179, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Orvieto M, Breyer B, Sokoloff M et al. Aortic injury during initial blunt trocar laparoscopic access for renal surgery. J Urol. 171(349–350), 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas MA, Rha KH, Ong AM et al. Optical access trocar injuries in urological laparoscopic surgery. J Urol. 170: 61–63, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasson HM. Modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 110:886–887, 1971.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Larobina M, Nottle P. Complete evidence regarding major vascular injuries during laparoscopic access. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 15:119–123, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abdelmaksoud A, Biyani CS, Bagheri F et al. Laparoscopic approaches in urology. BJU Intl. 95:244–249, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bloom DA, Ehrlich RM. Omental evisceration through smOnline laparoscopy port sites. J Endourol. 7(1):31–32, 1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sung GT, Gill IS. Anatomic landmarks and time management during retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Endourol. 16:165–169, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Madeb R, Koniaris LG, Patel HRH et al. Complications of laparoscopic urologic surgery. J Lap Adv Surg Tech. 14(5):287–301, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seifman BD, Dunn RL, Wolf JS Jr. Transperitoneal laparoscopy into the previously operated abdomen: Effect on operative time, length of stay and complications. J Urol. 169:36–40, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas R, Steele R, Ahuja S. Complications of urological laparoscopy: A standardized 1 institution experience. J Urol. 156:469–471, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeltser IS, Bergs R, Fernandez R et al. Single trocar laparoscopic nephrectomy using magnetic anchoring and guidance system in the porcine model. J Urol. 178:288–291, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hyams, E.S., Stifelman, M.D. (2010). Laparoscopic Access. In: Nakada, S.Y., Hedican, S.P. (eds) Essential Urologic Laparoscopy. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-820-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-820-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-819-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-820-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics