Skip to main content

Innovations in the Surgical Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Part of the book series: Clinical Gastroenterology ((CG))

  • 1760 Accesses

Abstract

Intestinal resections in Crohn’s disease should remove the gross margins of ­disease with a 2-cm margin of normal bowel; extended resection of microscopic disease does not affect recurrence rate. Bowel-sparing strictureplasties are important advances in the surgical management of small bowel Crohn’s disease, particularly in patients requiring resection of multiple segments or in preventing short bowel syndrome. A laparoscopic approach to certain surgeries may speed the recovery and lessen complications in IBD patients. The potential advantages of laparoscopic IBD surgery are not sufficient to warrant a strategy of earlier surgical intervention. Multiple factors determine the choice of surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis, including patient frailty, continence, and procedure-related expertise and complications. The presence of colon cancer or dysplasia in a patient with ulcerative colitis may impact the choice of surgical technique and increase the need for endoscopic surveillance of the ileoanal pouch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krause U, Ejerblad S, Bergman L. Crohn’s disease. A long-term study of the clinical course in 186 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985;20(4):516–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fazio VW, Marchetti F, Church M, et al. Effect of resection margins on the recurrence of Crohn’s disease in the small bowel. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1996;224(4):563–71, discussion 71–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michelassi F. Side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty for multiple Crohn’s strictures. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(3):345–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Michelassi F, Taschieri A, Tonelli F, et al. An international, multicenter, prospective, observational study of the side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(3):277–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharif H, Alexander-Williams J. The role of strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease. Int Surg. 1992;77(1):15–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozuner G, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Strong SA. Reoperative rates for Crohn’s disease following strictureplasty. Long-term analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(11):1199–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozuner G, Fazio VW. Management of gastrointestinal bleeding after strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(3):297–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fazio VW, Tjandra JJ, Lavery IC, Church JM, Milsom JW, Oakley JR. Long-term follow-up of strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(4):355–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurst RD, Michelassi F. Strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease: techniques and long-term results. World J Surg. 1998;22(4):359–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Serra J, Cohen Z, McLeod RS. Natural history of strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease: 9-year experience. Can J Surg. 1995;38(6):481–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Poggioli G, Stocchi L, Laureti S, et al. Conservative surgical management of terminal ileitis: side-to-side enterocolic anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(2):234–7, discussion 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaskowiak NT, Michelassi F. Adenocarcinoma at a strictureplasty site in Crohn’s disease: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(2):284–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marchetti F, Fazio VW, Ozuner G. Adenocarcinoma arising from a strictureplasty site in Crohn’s disease. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(11):1315–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosman AS, Melis M, Fichera A. Metaanalysis of trials comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(12):1549–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Milsom JW, Hammerhofer KA, Bohm B, Marcello P, Elson P, Fazio VW. Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(1):1–8, discussion 9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boushey RP, Marcello PW, Martel G, Rusin LC, Roberts PL, Schoetz Jr DJ. Laparoscopic total colectomy: an evolutionary experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(10):1512–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seshadri PA, Poulin EC, Schlachta CM, Cadeddu MO, Mamazza J. Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages? Surg Endosc. 2001;15(8):837–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahnen DJ. Gastrointestinal malignancies in inflammatory bowel disease. In: Kirsner JB, editor. Inflammatory Bowel Disease. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Delaney CP, et al. Dysplasia of the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: results of prospective evaluation after a minimum of ten years. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(1):6–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coull DB, Lee FD, Henderson AP, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Finlay IG. Risk of dysplasia in the columnar cuff after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 2003;90(1):72–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haray PN, Amarnath B, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Low malignant potential of the double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1996;83(10):1406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmitt SL, Wexner SD, Lucas FV, James K, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Retained mucosa after double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(11):1051–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Slors JF, Ponson AE, Taat CW, Bosma A. Risk of residual rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal reconstruction with the double-stapling technique. Postoperative endoscopic follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(2):207–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson-Fawcett MW, Mortensen NJ. Anal transitional zone and columnar cuff in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 1996;83(8):1047–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tulchinsky H, Hawley PR, Nicholls J. Long-term failure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2003;238(2):229–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rotholtz NA, Pikarsky AJ, Singh JJ, Wexner SD. Adenocarcinoma arising from along the rectal stump after double-stapled ileorectal J-pouch in a patient with ulcerative colitis: the need to perform a distal anastomosis. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(8):1214–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sequens R. Cancer in the anal canal (transitional zone) after restorative proctocolectomy with stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(4):254–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hyman N. Rectal cancer as a complication of stapled IPAA. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002;8(1):43–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baratsis S, Hadjidimitriou F, Christodoulou M, Lariou K. Adenocarcinoma in the anal canal after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis using a double stapling technique: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(5):687–91. discussion 91–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fichera A, Ragauskaite L, Silvestri MT, et al. Preservation of the anal transition zone in ulcerative colitis. Long-term effects on defecatory function. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(12):1647–52, discussion 52–3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ. Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis – a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(8):626–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fichera A, Silvestri MT, Hurst R, Rubin M, Michelassi F. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. A comparative observational study on long-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:526–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(8):1301–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Hurst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hurst, R. (2011). Innovations in the Surgical Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. In: Cohen, R. (eds) Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clinical Gastroenterology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-433-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-433-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-432-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-433-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics