Skip to main content

Abstract

Over the next 5 yr at FDA, there is a great need for the agency to continue its efforts to evolve and collaborate with the pharmaceutical industry to promote rationale drug development. The agency is dynamic, and whereas plans are in place that may provide some concept of the direction of future changes for both drug and biologics reviews, local and world events often cause a reactionary response at the FDA that is often unpredictable. What is clear is that the agency will need strong leadership and should continue to make every effort to improve the regulatory review process and its ability to assess safety and efficacy of new medicinal products in a carefully managed and balanced process. Some of the safety concerns raised after the withdrawal of a number of commonly used medicinal products of the past 10 yr have shifted FDA’s attention and resources away from critical programs intended to facilitate drug development and provide some regulatory relief to a struggling industry. To achieve improvements in both safety and efficacy assessments as well as review timelines and consistency in reviews within the agency, the FDA will have to further consolidate medicinal product reviews in alignment with therapeutic indications.

The FDA can provide both the biotechnology industry and the public great benefits in the future by revitalizing the effort to define critical path for medicinal product development and creating new methodologies to work with industry to accelerate product approval. The next 5 yr will be a critical period during which the FDA will need strong leadership to take managed risks to move forward a number of important initiatives intended to accelerate the drug development process. The leadership must also consolidate and focus internal resources within the agency to maintain consistent requirements for a therapeutic indication and continue to improve review processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McDonald, S. US Department of Health, History of Biologics. Food and Drug Administration website, September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Centennial — Commemorating 100 Years of Biologies Review, Food and Drug Administration website (www.FDA.gov/CBER/Inside/Centscireg.htm) September 25, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A Brief History of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration website (www.FDA.gov/CDER/About/History/Histex.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Milestones in Food and Drug Law History, Food and Drug Administration website (www. FDA.gov/opacom/loachgrounders/miles.html).

    Google Scholar 

  5. “FDA to Consolidate Review Responsibilities for New Pharma Products”, Food and Drug Administration Press Release September 6, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Food and Drug Administration PDUFA III Five-Year Plan, July 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office of Drug Safety Annual Report FY 2004, Food and Drug Administration website (www.FDA.gov/CDER/Office/ODS/AnnRep2004/default.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Center for Biologies Evaluation and Research FY 2004 Annual Report, Food and Drug Administration website (www.FDA.gov/CBER/Inside/Annrpt.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  9. “FDA Critical Path”, California Healthcare Institute White Paper 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. News Along the Pike, Critical Path report calls for modernization tools, July 15, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research CDER 2004 Report to the Nation:Improving Public Health Through Human Drugs (www.fda.gov/cder/reports/rtn/2004/rtn2004.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Memorandum of Understanding Between the Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologies Research and Evaluation (CBER) and the National Institute of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Fed. Register, Vol 70, No 180/Monday September 19, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hawthorne, F. (2005) Inside the FDA. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lowenthal, R.E., Bell, R.G. (2008). Changes in Biologic Drug Approval at FDA. In: Wu-Pong, S., Rojanasakul, Y. (eds) Biopharmaceutical Drug Design and Development. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-532-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics