Skip to main content

General Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Chapter
Cardiovascular MRI

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

  • 1885 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. 1. Danilouchkine MG, Westenberg JJ, Lelieveldt BP, and Reiber JH. Accuracy of short-axis cardiac MRI automatically derived from scout acquisitions in free-breathing and breath-holding modes. Magma, 2005;18(1):7–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2. Danias PG, Tritos NA, Stuber M, Kissinger KV, Salton CJ, and Manning WJ. Cardiac structure and function in the obese: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2003;5(3):431–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3. Gerber TC, Fasseas P, Lennon RJ, et al. Clinical safety of magnetic resonance imaging early after coronary artery stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003;42(7):1295–1298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4. Schroeder AP, Houlind K, Pedersen EM, Thuesen L, Nielsen TT, and Egeblad H. Magnetic resonance imaging seems safe in patients with intracoronary stents. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2000;2(1):43–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5. Strohm O, Kivelitz D, Gross W, et al. Safety of implantable coronary stents during 1H-magnetic resonance imaging at 1.0 and 1.5 T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 1999;1(3):239–245.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6. Alfakih K, Reid S, Jones T, and Sivananthan M. Assessment of ventricular function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol, 2004;14(10):1813–1822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7. Marcu CB, Beek AM, and Van Rossum AC. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of right heart involvement in cardiac and pulmonary disease. Heart Lung Circ, 2006;15(6):362–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8. Myerson SG, Bellenger NG, and Pennell DJ. Assessment of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Hypertension, 2002;39(3):750–755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9. Pujadas S, Reddy GP, Weber O, Lee JJ, and Higgins CB. MR imaging assessment of cardiac function. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004;19(6):789–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10. Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: assessment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med, 2006;47(1):74–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11. Manning WJ, Nezafat R, Appelbaum E, Danias PG, Hauser TH, and Yeon SB. Coronary Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Cardiol Clin, 2007;25(1):141–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12. Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Cury RC, and Pena AJ. Coronary CT angiography. J Nucl Med, 2006;47(5):797–806.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13. Carerj S, Micari A, Trono A, et al. Anatomical M-mode: an old-new technique. Echocardiography, 2003;20(4):357–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14. Sondergaard L, Hildebrandt P, Lindvig K, et al. Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Am Heart J, 1993;126(5):1156–1164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15. Chatzimavroudis GP, Oshinski JN, Franch RH, Walker PG, Yoganathan AP, and Pettigrew RI. Evaluation of the precision of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping for blood flow measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2001;3(1):11–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16. Gelfand EV, Hughes S, Hauser TH, et al. Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2006;8(3):503–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17. Ley S, Eichhorn J, Ley-Zaporozhan J, et al. Evaluation of aortic regurgitation in congenital heart disease: value of MR imaging in comparison to echocardiography. Pediatr Radiol, 2007;37(5):426–436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18. Marcu CB, Beek AM, and van Rossum AC. Clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Cmaj, 2006;175(8):911–917.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19. Danias PG, Stuber M, McConnell MV, and Manning WJ. The diagnosis of congenital coronary anomalies with magnetic resonance imaging. Coron Artery Dis, 2001;12(8):621–626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20. Varghese A, Keegan J, and Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of anomalous coronary arteries. Coron Artery Dis, 2005;16(6):355–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21. Isbell DC and Kramer CM. Magnetic resonance for the assessment of myocardial viability. Curr Opin Cardiol, 2006;21(5):469–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22. Kim DH, Choi SI, Chang HJ, Choi DJ, Lim C, and Park JH. Delayed hyperenhancement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical application for various cardiac diseases. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2006;30(2):226–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23. Vogel-Claussen J, Rochitte CE, Wu KC, et al. Delayed enhancement MR imaging: utility in myocardial assessment. Radiographics, 2006;26(3):795–810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24. Greenfield JC, Jr., Harley A, Thompson HK, and Wallace AG. Pressure-flow studies in man during atrial fibrillation. J Clin Invest, 1968;47(10):2411–2421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25. Hundley WG, Meshack BM, Willett DL, et al. Comparison of quantitation of left ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and cardiac output in patients with atrial fibrillation by cine magnetic resonance imaging versus invasive measurements. Am J Cardiol, 1996;78(10):1119–1123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26. Wyttenbach R, Bremerich J, Saeed M, and Higgins CB. Integrated MR imaging approach to valvular heart disease. Cardiol Clin, 1998;16(2):277–294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27. Didier D, Saint-Martin C, Lapierre C, et al. Coarctation of the aorta: pre and postoperative evaluation with MRI and MR angiography; correlation with echocardiography and surgery. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2006;22(3–4):457–475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28. Riehle TJ, Oshinski JN, Brummer ME, et al. Velocity-encoded magnetic resonance image assessment of regional aortic flow in coarctation patients. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006;81(3):1002–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). General Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: Cardiovascular MRI. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-511-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-511-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-934115-59-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-511-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics