Advertisement

Healthcare and the Politics of Race

  • M. Gregg Bloche
Chapter

Abstract

Straw men are large players in the debate over racial disparity in American medicine. Most have been deployed by the disparities-denying right, but progressives intent on “outing” racism have sent forth their share. In this chapter, I devote some effort to flushing them out. But my larger aim is to understand the competing moral premises that drive the politics of healthcare disparity. At the bottom, I contend, arguments about the scope of disparity and discrimination in medical care are disputes about the appropriate scope of personal responsibility for life circumstances. Further research into the factors that correlate with racial differences in healthcare can shed light on the circumstances that bring about these differences. But whether these circumstances, once understood, should be deemed acceptable is a moral and political matter. Sharp disagreements over the scope of personal and public responsibility for these circumstances are inevitable. These disagreements make it harder to pursue common ground solutions to racial and other inequities in healthcare.

Keywords

Racial Disparity Racial Bias Differential Cost Minority Group Member Healthcare Disparity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Epstein, R. (2005) Disparities and discrimination in health care coverage: A critique of the Institute of Medicine study. Perspect. Biol. Med. 48(Suppl), S26–S41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bloche, M. G. (2004a) Health care disparities: Science, politics, and race. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 1574–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Satel, S. and Klick, J. (2005) The Institute of Medicine report: Too quick to diagnosis bias. Prespect. Biol. Med. 48(Suppl), S15–S25.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balsa, A. I., et al. (2003) Clinical uncertainty and healthcare disparities. Am. J. Law Med. 29, 203–219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wennberg, J. E. (1985) On patient need, equity, supplier-induced demand, and the need to assess the outcome of common medical practices. Med. Care 23, 512–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baicker, K., Chandra, A., and Skinner, J. S. (2005) Geographic variation in health care and the problem of measuring racial disparities. Perspect. Biol. Med. 48(Suppl), S42–S53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bloche, M. G. (2004b) Race-based therapeutics. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 2035–2037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, D. B. (1999) Health care divided: Race and healing a nation. University of Michigan Press, Ann. Arbor.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bloche, M. G. (2001) Race and discretion in American medicine. Yale J. Health Policy Law Ethics 1, 95–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bloche, M. G. (2003) The invention of health law. California Law Rev. 91, 247–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Todd, P. M. and Gigerenzer, G. (2000) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 727–780.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moynihan, D. P. (1986) Family and nation. Harcourt, New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Calabrese, M. and Rubiner, L. (2004) Universal coverage, universal responsibility: A roadmap to make coverage affordable for all Americans. New America Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smedley, B. D., Stith, A. Y., and Nelson, A. R. (eds.) (2003) Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Gregg Bloche
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Georgetown UniversityGeorgetown
  2. 2.The Brookings InstitutionUSA
  3. 3.Bloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins UniversityWashington, D.C.

Personalised recommendations