Abstract
Severe forms of blindness, resulting in a loss of light perception has a devastating impact on the functional ability (1), physiological state (2), and psychosocial well-being of affected patients (3). Severe visual impairment (acuity 20/200 or worse) affects around 0.7% of the population in Australia older than 49 yr (4), with the population weighted prevalence of profound visual impairment being 1.56/1000. In the United States more than one million people are legally blind with approx 10% having no light perception (5,6). Causes of adult blindness include age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, end-stage retinal dystrophy, diabetic retinopathy, optic nerve ischaemia, and trauma (7). One common factor with these pathologies is that once damage has occurred to neural tissue it is permanent because of the poor capacity of neural tissue in the central nervous system to regenerate. Recent experimental treatments, such as gene therapy, nerve cell transplantation, and growth factors have not been successful in restoring visual perception to blind patients (8). The only experimental method, which has successfully restored visual sensation to otherwise irreversibly blind patients is electrical stimulation of the retina, optic nerve, or brain with a prosthetic device (9,10). Of these three approaches, a prosthetic device, which acts on the visual area of the brain is the only method that has been investigated extensively in chronic human trials, and has restored visual perceptions, which have increased a blind patient’s mobility and independence (11).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Weih L, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Functional implications of vision impairment. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;28(3):153–155.
Sack RL, Lewy AJ, Blood ML, Keith LD, Nakagawa H. Circadian rhythm abnormalities in totally blind people: incidence and clinical significance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;75(1):127–134.
DeLeo D, Hickey PA, Meneghel G, Cantor CH. Blindness, fear of sight loss, and suicide. Psychosomatics 1999;40(4):339–344.
Attebo K, Mitchell P, Smith W. Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1996;103(3):357–364.
Chiang YP, Bassi LJ, Javitt JC. Federal budgetary costs of blindness. Milbank Q 1992;70(2):319–340.
Ross RD. Is perception of light useful to the blind patient? (comment). Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116(2):236–238.
Krumpaszky G, Klauss V. Epidemiology of blindness and eye disease. Ophthalmologica 1996;210(1):1–84.
Sharma RK, Ehinger B. Management of hereditary retinal degenerations: present status and future directions. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;43(5):427–444.
Maynard EM. Visual prostheses. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2001;3:145–168.
Margalit E, Maia M, Weiland JD, et al. Retinal prosthesis for the blind. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47(4):335–356.
Dobelle WH. Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J 2000;46(1):3–9.
Le Roy M. (Mémoire) Ou I’on rende compte de quelques tentatives que I’on a faites pour guérir plusieurs maladies par l’électricité. Mém Mat Phys Acad Roy Sci Paris 1775;60:98.
Brindley GS, Lewin WS. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1968;196(2):479–493.
Button J, Putnam T. Visual responses to cortical stimulation in the blind. J Iowa State Med Soc 1962;52:17–21.
Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG. Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind. J Physiol (Lond) 1974;243(2):553–576.
Dobelle WH, Quest DO, Antunes JL, Roberts TS, Girvin JP. Artificial vision for the blind by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. Neurosurgery 1979;5(4):521–527.
Normann RA, Maynard EM, Rousche PJ, Warren DJ. A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis. Vision Res 1999;39(15):2577–2587.
Chowdhury V, Morley JW, Coroneo MT. An in-vivo paradigm for the evaluation of stimulating electrodes for use with a visual prosthesis. Aust N Z J Surg 2004;74(5):372–378.
Chowdhury V, Morley JW, Coroneo MT. Surface stimulation of the brain with a prototype array for a visual cortex prosthesis. J Clin Neurosci 2004;11(7):750–755.
Curtis HJ. Intercortical connections of corpus callosum as indicated by evoked potentials. J Neurophysiol 1940;3:405–413.
Curtis HJ. An analysis of cortical potentials mediated by the corpus callosum. J Neurophysiol 1940;3:414–421.
Chang HT. Cortical response to activity of callosal neurons. J Neurophysiol 1953;16:117–131.
Peacock SM. Activity of anterior suprasylvian gyrus in response to transcallosal afferent volleys. J Neurophysiol 1957;20:140–155.
Kawamura K. Corticocortical fiber connections of the cat cerebrum. 2. The parietal region. Brain Res 1973;51:23–40.
Testerman RL. The cortical response to callosal stimulation: a model for determining safe and efficient stimulus parameters. Ann Biomed Eng 1978;6(4):438–452.
Sollmann WP, Laszig R, Marangos N. Surgical experiences in 58 cases using the Nucleus 22 multichannel auditory brainstem implant. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 2000;27:23–26.
Jayakar P. Physiological principles of electrical stimulation. Adv Neurol 1993;63:17–27.
Finn WE, LoPresti PG. Handbook of neuroprosthetic methods. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2003.
Yeomans JS. Principles of Brain Stimulation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
McCreery D, Agnew WF. Neuronal and axonal injury during functional electrical stimulation. Ann Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1990;12(4):1488–1489.
McCreery DB, Agnew WF, Yuen TG, Bullara L. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990;37(10):996–1001.
Weiland J, Liu W, Humayun MS. Retinal prosthesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2005;7:361–401.
Rizzo JF, Wyatt J, Humayun M, et al. Retinal prosthesis: an encouraging first decade with major challenges ahead. Ophthalmology 2001;108(1):13–14.
Kanda H, Morimoto T, Fujikado T, Tano Y, Fukuda Y, Sawai H. Electrophysiological studies of the feasibility of suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation for artificial vision in normal and RCS rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45(2):560–566.
Sakaguchi H, Fujikado T, Fang X, et al. Transretinal electrical stimulation with a suprachoroidal multichannel electrode in rabbit eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2004;48(5):515.
Piyathaisere DV, Margalit E, Chen SJ, et al. Heat effects on the retina. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2003;34(2):114–120.
Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res 2003;43(24):2573–2581.
Chow AY, Pardue MT, Chow VY, et al. Implantation of silicon chip microphotodiode arrays into the cat subretinal space. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2001;9(1):86–95.
Shinoda K, Gekeler F, Eckert E, Zrenner E, Gabel V-P, Kobuch K. Externo-Implantation,-explantation and postoperative follow up of subretinal electronic devices. ARVO Meeting Abstracts 2002;43(12):4471.
Majji AB, Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Suzuki S, D’Anna SA, de Juan E Jr. Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;40(9):2073–2081.
Margalit E, Fujii GY, Lai JC, et al. Bioadhesives for intraocular use. Retina 2000;20(5):469–477.
Chowdhury V, Morley JW, Coroneo MT. Evaluation of extraocular electrodes for a retinal prosthesis from evoked potentials in cat visual cortex. J Clin Neurosci 2005a;12(5):574–579.
Chowdhury V, Morley JW, Coroneo MT. Stimulation of the retina with a multielectrode extraocular visual prosthesis. Aust N Z J Surg 2005;75:697–704.
Chowdhury V, Morley JW, Coroneo MT. Feasibility of Extraocular Stimulation for a Retinal Prosthesis. Can J Ophthalmol 2005c;40:563–572.
Ranck JB. Extracellular Stimulation. In: Patterson MM, Kesner RP, eds. Electrical stimulation research techniques. New York: Academic Press, 1981:1–36.
Chiquet C, Dkhissi-Benyahya O, Cooper HM. Is the study of blind patients useful for understanding light perception? Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117(6):848.
Humayun MS, Prince M, de Juan E Jr., et al. Morphometric analysis of the extramacular retina from postmortem eyes with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40(1):143–148.
Dawson WW, Radtke ND. The electrical stimulation of the retina by indwelling electrodes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977;6(3):249–252.
Schanze T, Wilms M, Eger M, Hesse L, Eckhorn R. Activation zones in cat visual cortex evoked by electrical retina stimulation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240(11):947–954.
Robblee LS, Cogan SF. Metals for medical electrodes. In: Bever MB, ed. Encyclopedia of materials science and engineering. Oxford Pergamon Press, 1986; pp. 276–281.
Lamme VA, Super H, Landman R, Roelfsema PR, Spekreijse H. The role of primary visual cortex (V1) in visual awareness. Vision Res 2000;40(10–12):1507–1521.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Humana Press Inc., Totowa NJ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morley, J.W., Chowdhury, V., Coroneo, M.T. (2007). Visual Cortex and Extraocular Retinal Stimulation With Surface Electrode Arrays. In: Tombran-Tink, J., Barnstable, C.J., Rizzo, J.F. (eds) Visual Prosthesis and Ophthalmic Devices. Ophthalmology Research. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-449-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-449-0_11
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-934115-16-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-449-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)