Advertisement

A Context for Thinking About Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Ethics

Chapter
Part of the Biomedical Ethics Reviews book series (BER)

Abstract

Have we come full circle in the evolution of medicine? The dictionary defines the term full circle as “back to one’s starting point,” so the answer is probably no. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is changing conventional medicine, and conventional medicine is changing CAM practices. Clearly, however, with the growing popularity of CAM today, patients and the public want something more or something different than conventional medicine can, in many circumstances, provide.

Keywords

Alternative Medicine Conventional Medicine Conventional Care Park Ridge Tional Medicine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Van Rompay MI, et al. Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135:344–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaptchuk TJ. The placebo effect in alternative medicine: can the performance of a healing ritual have clinical significance? Ann Intern Med 2002;137:817–825.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaptchuk TJ, Eisenberg DM. The persuasive appeal of alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:1061–1065.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pagan JA, Pauly MV. Access to conventional medical care and the use of complementary and alternative medicine. Health Affairs 2005;24:255–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bondurant S, Sox HC. Mainstream and alternative medicine: converging paths require common standards. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142:149–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Payne JW. What really works? Forget hearsay. Here’s how science sizes up some therapies. Washington Post, July 12, 2005, p. HE01.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braddock CH, Snyder L. The doctor will see you shortly: the ethical significance of time for the patient-physician relationship. JGIM 2005;20:1057–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guinn DE. An integrative ethics. Park Ridge Center Second Opinion #7. Park Ridge,IL Park Ridge Center, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cassell EJ. Consent or obedience? Power and authority in medicine. N Eng J Med 2005;352:328–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: A national study of public preferences. JGIM 2005;20:531–535.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Pennsylvania Center for BioethicsPhiladelphia
  2. 2.Center for Ethics and Professionalism at the American College of PhysiciansPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations