Advertisement

Renal Ultrasound

  • Jennifer Simmons
  • Pat F. FulghamEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Current Clinical Urology book series (CCU)

Abstract

Technical innovations have resulted in the creation of lower-cost and portable ultrasound machines that have the potential to provide a valuable tool to assist in bedside evaluation. Point-of-service ultrasound is well suited for the expeditious diagnosis of renal disorders while facilitating subsequent therapeutic interventions such as percutaneous procedures and ablations. The combination of an accurate diagnostic tool with the clinical acumen of a well-trained urologist is likely to improve health-care delivery while reducing the cost of providing that care.

Keywords

Left Kidney Renal Mass Renal Cyst Renal Ultrasound Renal Sinus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr Simmons wanted to acknowledge and thank Daniel Rukstalis, MD for his contributions to the chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Surange RS, Jeygopal NS, Chowdhury SD, Sharma NK. Bedside ultrasound: a useful tool for the on-call urologist? Int Urol Nephrol. 2001;32(4):591–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Datta SN, Allen GM, Evans R, Vaughton KC, Lucas MG. Urinary tract ultrasonography in the evaluation of haematuria—a report of over 1000 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84(3):203–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    AIUM Practice Guidelines, Ultrasound in the practice of urology. 2011. http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines/urology.pdf. Accessed Mar 2013.
  4. 4.
    American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline: diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up of asymptomatic microhematuria (AMH) in adults: AUA Guideline. 2012. http://www.auanet.org/content/media/asymptomatic_microhematuria_guideline.pdf. Accessed May 2012.
  5. 5.
    American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline: clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. 2012. http://www.auanet.org/content/media/imaging_assessment.pdf. Accessed Mar 2013.
  6. 6.
    Wein A. Campbell-Walsh urology, vol. 1. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emamian SA, Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Ytte L. Kidney dimensions at sonography: correlation with age, sex, and habitus in 665 adult volunteers. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(1):83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han BK, Babcock DS. Sonographic measurements and appearance of normal kidneys in children. Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145(3):611–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adam A, editor. Grainger and Allison’s diagnostic radiology, No 1. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moghazi S, Jones E, Schroepple J, et al. Correlation of renal histopathology with sonographic findings. Kidney Int. 2005;67(4):1515–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shokeir AA, Abdulmaaboud M. Resistive index in renal colic: a prospective study. BJU Int. 1999;83(4):378–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rawashdeh YF, Djurhuus JC, Mortensen J, Horlyck A, Frokiaer J. The intrarenal resistive index as a pathophysiological marker of obstructive uropathy. J Urol. 2001;165(5):1397–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shokeir AA, Abdulmaaboud M. Prospective comparison of nonenhanced helical computerized tomography and Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of renal colic. J Urol. 2001;165(4):1082–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horrigan TJ, Reese CS, Parres JA, Clarke HS, Desmond A, Kropp KA. A study of resistive indices in the arcuate arteries of the kidney over the course of gestation. J Perinatol. 1996;16(6):467–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Acute renal obstruction: evaluation with intrarenal duplex Doppler and conventional US. Radiology. 1993;186(3):685–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andreoiu M, MacMahon R. Renal colic in pregnancy: lithiasis or physiological hydronephrosis? Urology. 2009;74(4):757–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shokeir AA, Mahran MR, Abdulmaaboud M. Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index. Urology. 2000;55(3):344–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tublin ME, Bude RO, Platt JF. Review. The resistive index in renal Doppler sonography: where do we stand? Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(4):885–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology. 1986;158(1):1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Israel GM, Bosniak MA. An update of the Bosniak renal cyst classification system. Urology. 2005;66:484–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shathabish S. A longitudinal study of kidney structure and function in adults. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(4):1120–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gourtsoyiannis N, Prassopoulos P, Cavouras D, Pantelidis N. The thickness of the renal parenchyma decreases with age: a CT study of 360 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155(3):541–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Akpinar IN, Altun E, Avcu S, Tuney D, Ekinci G, Biren T. Sonographic measurement of kidney size in geriatric patients. J Clin Ultrasound. 2003;31(6):315–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2078–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith-Bindman R. Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Patlas M, Farkas A, Fisher D, Zaghal I, Hadas-Halpern I. Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(886):901–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sheafor DH, Hertzberg BS, Freed KS, et al. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. Radiology. 2000;217(3):792–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ripolles T, Agramunt M, Errando J, Martinez MJ, Coronel B, Morales M. Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(1):129–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    de Souza LR, Goldman SM, Faintuch S, et al. Comparison between ultrasound and noncontrast helical computed tomography for identification of acute ureterolithiasis in a teaching hospital setting. Sao Paulo Med J Revista Paulista de Medicina. 2007;125(2):102–7.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Katz SI, Saluja S, Brink JA, Forman HP. Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(4):1120–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    AUA Guideline: clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. http://www.auanet.org/content/media/imaging_assessment.pdf. Accessed Mar 2013
  33. 33.
    Ellenbogen PH, Scheible FW, Talner LB, Leopold GR. Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract obstruction. Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130:731–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Manger JP, Mendoza PJ, Babayan RK, Wang DS. Use of renal ultrasound to detect hydronephrosis after ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2009;23(9):1399–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23:478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    O’Neill Charles W. Atlas of renal ultrasonography. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2001. pp. 43, 47.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of UrologyGeisinger Medical CenterDanvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of UrologyTexas Health Presbyterian DallasDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations