Advertisement

Bioeffects and Safety

  • Pat F. FulghamEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Current Clinical Urology book series (CCU)

Abstract

Urologists who perform and interpret ultrasound in their office must have a thorough knowledge of the potential bioeffects of ultrasound in human tissues and how to maintain the ultrasound equipment to protect patient safety. Diagnostic ultrasound transmits energy into the patient which has the potential to produce biological effects. The maximum output of ultrasound energy by ultrasound devices is regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [1]. In general, these regulations allow enough energy to accomplish diagnostic goals but prescribe a margin of safety. The total energy imparted during an ultrasound examination is controlled by the operator through (1) acoustic output, (2) selection of frequency, (3) mode of ultrasound, (4) technique, and (5) duration of the examination.

Keywords

Personal Protective Equipment Acoustic Power Mechanical Index Ultrasound Transducer Diagnostic Ultrasound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Guidance for industry and FDA staff-information for manufacturers seeking marketing clearance of ­diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers. Document issued on 9 Sept 2008. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm070856.htm.
  2. 2.
    Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine consensus report on potential bioeffects of diagnostic ultrasound: executive summary. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:503–15.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Susani M, Madersbacher S, Kratzik C, Vingers L, Marberger M. Morphology of tissue destruction induced by focused ultrasound. Eur Urol. 1993;23 Suppl 1:34–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW. Diagnostic ultrasound. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2005 (Ch. 2, Page 37).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Brien WD, Deng CS, Harris GR, Herman BA, Merritt CR, Sanghvi N, et al. The risk of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in postnatal subjects: thermal effects. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:517–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Church CC, Carstensen EL, Nyborg WL, Carson PL, Frizzell LA, Bailey MR. The risk of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in postnatal subjects: nonthermal mechanisms. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:565–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nelson TR, Fowlkes JB, Abramowicz JS, Church CC. Ultrasound biosafety considerations for the practicing sonographer and sinologist. J Ultrasound Med. 2009; 18:139–50.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. How to interpret the ultrasound output display standard for higher acoustic output diagnostic ultrasound devices: version 2 [technical bulletin]. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23:723–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Official Statement on Prudent Use Clinical Safety. April 2012. http://www.aium.org/resources/statements.aspx Accessed 29 Jan 2013.
  10. 10.
    United States Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Hospital eTool, Clinical services sonography. http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/products/etools/hospital/sonography/sonography.html.
  11. 11.
    Makary MA, Epstein J, Pronovost PJ, Millman EA, Hartmann EC, Freischlag JA. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care. Surgery. 2007;141(4):450–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Routine quality assurance for diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Published by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 2008. http://www.aium.org.
  13. 13.
    Rutala WA, Weber DJ, The Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC).Guidelines for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities; 2008. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/guidelines/Disinfection_Nov_2008.pdf Accessed 29 Jan 2013.
  14. 14.
    FDA public health notification: reprocessing of reusable ultrasound transducer assemblies used for biopsy procedures; 2006. http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/publichealthnotifications/ucm062086 Accessed 22 June 2006.
  15. 15.
    AIUM Guidelines for Cleaning and Preparing Endocavitary Ultrasound Transducers Between Patients. Approved June 4, 2003. http://www.aium.org/resources/statements.asp.xAccessed 29 Jan 2013.
  16. 16.
    FDA-cleared sterilants and high level disinfectants with general claims for processing reusable medical and dental devices, March 2009. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/ReprocessingofSingle-UseDevices/ucm133514.htm.
  17. 17.
    ANSI/AAMI ST58:1005(R)2010. Chemical sterilization and high level disinfection in health care ­facilities. Developed by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Approved by the American National Standards Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyTexas Health Presbyterian DallasDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations