Compute Radiography Digital Radiography Human Remains Primary Survey Secondary Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Aitken, A. G., O. Flodmark, D. E. Newman, R. F. Kilcoyne, W. P. Shuman, and L. A. Mack 1985 Leg length determination by CT digital radiography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 144(3):613–615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, C. J. and G. A. Foote 1998 Radiology in forensic identification: The Mt. Erebus disaster. Australas. Radiol. 42(4):321–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Association of Forensic Radiographers 2004 Radiography facilities for temporary emergency mortuaries in the event of a mass fatality incident (unpublished paper). London.Google Scholar
  4. Bass, W. M. 1990 Forensic anthropology. In CAP Handbook for Postmortem Examination of Unidentified Remain; Developing Identification of Well Preserved, Decomposed, Burned, and Skeletonised Remains, M. F. Fierro, ed. College of American Pathologists, Skokie, IL.Google Scholar
  5. Beningfield, S., H. Potgieter, A. Nicol, S. van As, G. Bowie, E. Hering, and E. Latti 2003 Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine. Emerg. Radiol. 10(1):23–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Binda, M., C. Cattaneo, A. Bogoni, P. Fattorini, and M. Grandi 1999 Identification of human skeletal remains: Forensic radiology vs. DNA. Radiol. Med. (Torino) 97(5):409–411.Google Scholar
  7. Bisset, R. A., N. B. Thomas, I. W. Turnbull, and S. Lee 2002 Postmortem examinations using magnetic resonance imaging: Four-year review of a working service. BMJ 324(7351):1423–1424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brogdon, B. G. 1998a Radiological identification of individual remains. In Forensic Radiology, B. G.Brogdon, ed., pp. 149–187. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  9. 1998b Radiological identification: Anthropological parameters. In Forensic Radiology, B. G. Brogdon, ed., pp. 63–96. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  10. Brogdon, B. G. and J. E. Lichtenstein 1998 Forensic radiology in historical perspective. In Forensic Radiology, B. G. Brogdon, ed., pp. 13–34. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  11. Brogdon, B. G., H. Vogel, and J. McDowell 2003 A Radiologic Atlas of Abuse, Torture and Inflicted Trauma. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  12. Brookes, J. A., M. A. Hall-Craggs, V. R. Sams, and W. R. Lees 1996 Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 348(9035):1139–1141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryan, G. J. 1979 Diagnostic Radiography, 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  14. Buchner, A. 1985 The identification of human remains. Int. Dent. J. 35(4):307–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Burrows, E. H. 1986 Pioneers and Early Years: A History of British Radiology. Colophon Ltd., Alderney, Chanel Islands.Google Scholar
  16. Chilvarquer, I., J. O. Katz, D. M. Glassman, T. J. Prihoda, and J. A. Cottone 1987 Comparative radiographic study of human and animal long bone patterns. J. Forensic Sci. 32(6):1645–1654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Craig, E. A. 1995 Intercondylar shelf angle: A new method to determine race from the distal femur. J. Forensic Sci. 40(5):777–782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Culbert, W. L. and F. M. Law 1927 Identification by comparison of roentgenograms of nasal accessory sinuses and mastoid processes. JAMA (88):1632–1636.Google Scholar
  19. Dimond, B. 2002 Legal Aspects of Radiography and Radiology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Eckert, W. G. and N. Garland 1984 The history of the forensic applications in radiology. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 5(1):53–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Emerton, D., I. Honey, A. McKenzie, P. Blake, D. Annett, C. Lawinski, and H. Cole 2005 Computed Radiography Systems for General Radiography (CR) Comparative Report, Edition 2, Report 05081. NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  22. Engel-Hills, P. 2006 Radiation protection in medical imaging. Radiography 12(2):153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans, K. T., B. Knight, and D. K. Whittaker 1981 Forensic Radiology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Fischman, S. L. 1985 The use of medical and dental radiographs in identification. Int. Dent. J. 35(4):301–306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Glasser, O. 1931 First Roentgen evidence. Radiology (17):789.Google Scholar
  26. Goodman, N. R. and L. B. Edelson 2002 The efficiency of an X-ray screening system at a mass disaster. J. Forensic Sci. 47(1):127–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodman, P. C. 1995 The new light: Discovery and introduction of the X-ray. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 165(5):1041–1045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gould, P. 2003 X-ray detectives turn images into evidence. Diagn. Imaging (Special edition).Google Scholar
  29. Greulich, W. W. and S. I. Pyle 1959 Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  30. Haglund, W. D. and C. L. Fligner 1993 Confirmation of human identification using computerized tomography (CT). J. Forensic Sci. 38(3):708–712.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall-Edwards, J. 1908 On X-ray dermatitis and its prevention. Arch. Roentgen Ray (13):243–248.Google Scholar
  32. Halperin, E. C. 1988 X-rays at the bar, 1896–1910. Invest. Radiol. 23(8):639–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hansman, C. F. 1962 Appearance and fusion of ossification centers in the human skeleton. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 88:476–482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Harcke, H. T., J. A. Bifano, and K. K. Koeller 2002 Forensic radiology: Response to the Pentagon Attack on September 11, 2001. Radiology 223(1):7–8.Google Scholar
  35. Hart, D. and B. F. Wall 2002 Radiation exposure of the UK population from medical and dental X-ray examinations. National Radiological Protection Board-W4, Chilton.Google Scholar
  36. Hildebolt, C. F., M. W. Vannier, and R. H. Knapp 1990 Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 82(3):283–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoerr, N. L., S. I. Pyle, and C. C. Francis 1962 Radiological Atlas of the Foot and Ankle. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  38. International X-ray Protection Committee 1928 International recommendations for X-ray and radium protection. Br. J. Radiol. (1):358–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackowski, C., E. Aghayev, M. Sonnenschein, R. Dirnhofer, and M. J. Thali 2006 Maximum intensity projection of cranial computed tomography data for dental identification. Int. J. Legal Med. 120(3):165–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jenkins, D. 1980 Radiographic Photography and Imaging Processes. MTP Press Ltd., Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
  41. Jensen, S. 1991 Identification of human remains lacking skull and teeth. A case report with some methodological considerations. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 12(2):93–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kahana, T. and J. Hiss 1997 Identification of human remains: Forensic radiology. J. Clin. Forensic Med. 4(1):7–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kahana, T., J. A. Ravioli, C. L. Urroz, and J. Hiss 1997 Radiographic identification of fragmentary human remains from a mass disaster. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 18(1):40–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kirk, N. J., R. E. Wood, and M. Goldstein 2002 Skeletal identification using the frontal sinus region: A retrospective study of 39 cases. J. Forensic Sci. 47(2):318–323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Krogman, W. M. and M. Y. Iscan 1986 The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, 2nd ed. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  46. Kurihara, Y., Y. Kurihara, K. Ohashi, A. Kitagawa, M. Miyasaka, E. Okamoto, and T. Ishikawa 1996 Radiologic evidence of sex differences: Is the patient a woman or a man? AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 167(4):1037–1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lawinski, C., A. McKenzie, H. Cole, P. Blake, and I. Honey 2005 Digital Detectors for General Radiography: A Comparative Technical Report 05078. NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  48. Levinsohn 1899 Beitraz zur feststellung der identitat. Arch. Krim. Anthrop. (2):221.Google Scholar
  49. Lichtenstein, J. E. 1998 Radiology in mass casualty situations. In Forensic Radiology, B. G. Brogdon, ed., pp. 189–208. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  50. Maresh, M. M. 1943 Growth of major long bones in healthy children. Am. J. Dis. Child. 66:227–257.Google Scholar
  51. Marlin, D. C., M. A. Clark, and S. M. Standish 1991 Identification of human remains by comparison of frontal sinus radiographs: A series of four cases. J. Forensic Sci. 36(6):1765–1772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mason, R. and S. Bourne 1998 A Guide to Dental Radiography, 4th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  53. McCormick, W. F. 1980 Mineralization of the costal cartilages as an indicator of age: Preliminary observations. J. Forensic Sci. 25(4):736–741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Mora, S. et al. 2001 Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle standards. Pediatr. Res. (50):624–812.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mulligan, M. E., M. J. McCarthy, F. J. Wippold, J. E. Lichtenstein, and G. N. Wagner 1988 Radiologic evaluation of mass casualty victims: Lessons from the Gander, Newfoundland, accident. Radiology 168(1):229–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Murphy, W. A., F. G. Spruill, and G. E. Gantner 1980 Radiologic identification of unknown human remains. J. Forensic Sci. 25(4):727–735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Myers, J. C., M. I. Okoye, D. Kiple, E. H. Kimmerle, and K. J. Reinhard 1999 Three-dimensional (3-D) imaging in post-mortem examinations: Elucidation and identification of cranial and facial fractures in victims of homicide utilizing 3-D computerized imaging reconstruction techniques. Int. J. Legal Med. 113(1):33–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nambiar, P., M. D. Naidu, and K. Subramaniam 1999 Anatomical variability of the frontal sinuses and their application in forensic identification. Clin. Anat. 12(1):16–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Navani, S., J. R. Shah, and P. S. Levy 1970 Determination of sex by costal cartilage calcification. Am, J, Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 108(4):771–774.Google Scholar
  60. Nye, P. J., T. L. Tytle, R. N. Jarman, and B. G. Eaton 1996 The role of radiology in the Oklahoma City bombing. Radiology 200(2):541–543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Pyle, S. I. and N. L. Hoerr 1955 Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Knee. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
  62. Reichs, K. and R. B. J. Dorion 1992 The use of computed tomography (CT) scans in the analysis of frontal sinus configuration. Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J. (25):1.Google Scholar
  63. Riepert, T., C. Rittner, D. Ulmcke, S. Ogbuihi, and F. Schweden 1995 Identification of an unknown corpse by means of computed tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine. J. Forensic Sci. 40(1):126–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Rocha Sdos, S., D. L. Ramos, and G. Cavalcanti Mde 2003 Applicability of 3D-CT facial reconstruction for forensic individual identification. Pesqui. Odontol. Bras. 17(1):24–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roentgen, W. C. 1895 A new kind of ray. Phys.-Med. Ges. (137):132–141.Google Scholar
  66. Rogers, T. and S. Saunders 1994 Accuracy of sex determination using morphological traits of the human pelvis. J. Forensic Sci. 39(4):1047–1056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Rutty, G. N. 2006 University of Leicester Announces World First Forensic Technique: A New Horizon for Mass Fatality Radiology, University of Leicester Press Release, Leicester.Google Scholar
  68. Sanders, I., M. E. Woesner, Leicester. R. A. Ferguson, and T. T. Noguchi 1972 A new application of forensic radiology: Identification of deceased from a single clavicle. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 115(3):619–622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Scheuer, L. and S. Black 2004 The Juvenile Skeleton. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  70. Schwartz, S. and E. D. Woolridge 1977 The use of panoramic radiographs for comparisons in cases of identification. J. Forensic Sci. 22(1):145–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Society of Radiographers 2005 Radiographers help identify London Bombing victims. Synergy September:1.Google Scholar
  72. Sutherland, L. D. and J. M. Suchey 1991 Use of the ventral arc in pubic sex determination. J. Forensic Sci. 36(2):501–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Tanner, R. J., B. F. Wall, P. C. Shrimpton, et al. 2001 Frequency of Medical and Dental X-ray Examinations in the UK, 1997–98. National Radiological Protection Board.Google Scholar
  74. Thali, M. J. et al. 2000 Improved vision in forensic documentation: Forensic 3D/CAD-supported photogrammetry of bodily injury internal structures to provide more leads and stronger practical forensic evidence. Paper presented at the International Society of Optical Engineers: 3D Visualisation for Data Exploration and Decision Making.Google Scholar
  75. Thali, M. J., T. Markwalder, C. Jackowski, M. Sonnenschein, and R. Dirnhofer 2006 Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: Advantages and limitations. J. Forensic Sci. 51(1):113–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thali, M. J., K. Yen, W. Schweitzer, P. Vock, C. Boesch, C. Ozdoba, G. Schroth, M. Ith, M. Sonnenschein, T. Doernhoefer, E. Scheurer, T. Plattner, and R. Dirnhofer 2003a Virtopsy, a new imaging horizon in forensic pathology: Virtual autopsy by postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—A feasibility study. J. Forensic Sci. 48(2):386–403.Google Scholar
  77. Thali, M. J., K. Yen, W. Schweitzer, P. Vock, C. Ozdoba, and R. Dirnhofer 2003b Into the decomposed body-forensic digital autopsy using multislice-computed tomography. Forensic Sci. Int. 134(2–3):109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tonello, B. 1998 Mass Grave Investigations. Paper presented at the Imaging Science Oncologists, British Institute of Radiology.Google Scholar
  79. Trotter, M. and G. C. Gleser 1952 Estimation of stature from long bones of American whites and Negroes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 10:463–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 1958 A re-evaluation of estimation of stature based on measurements of stature taken during life and of long bones after death. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 16:79–123.Google Scholar
  81. Uysal, S., D. Gokharman, M. Kacar, I. Tuncbilek, and U. Kosa 2005 Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. J. Forensic Sci. 50(6):1310–1314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Viner, M. D. 2001a Forensic investigation: The role of radiography. Eur. Radiol. Supplement to Volume 11(2):95.Google Scholar
  83. 2001b Forensic investigation: The role of radiography in forensic medicine. ISRRT Newsletter 37(2):4–7.Google Scholar
  84. 2001c The radiographers role in forensic investigation. Hold Pusten: J. Norwegian Soc. Radiog. (9/2001).Google Scholar
  85. Viner, M. D., M. Cassidy, and V. Treu 1998 The Role of Radiography in a Disaster Investigation. Paper presented at the Imaging Science Oncolologists, British Institute of Radiology.Google Scholar
  86. Viner, M. D., W. Hoban, C. Rock, and M. T. Cassidy 2003 The Role of Radiography in the Investigation of Mass Incidents. Paper presented at the American Academy of Forensic Science 55th Scientific Meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  87. Viner, M. D., C. Rock, N. Hunt, G. Mackinnon, and A. W. Martin 2006 Forensic Radiography: Response to the London Suicide Bombings on 7th July 2005. Paper presented at the American Academy of Forensic Science 58th Scientific Meeting, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark D. Viner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations