Skip to main content

Abstract

The head is elevated slightly with a wooden block or a metal headrest attached to the autopsy table. The hair is parted with a comb along a coronal plane connecting one mastoid with the other over the convexity (Fig. 4-1).A sharp scalpel blade can then be used to cut through the whole thickness of the scalp from the outside. The incision should starton the right side of the head(the “viewing-side” in most American funeral parlors) just behind the earlobe, as low as possible without extending below the earlobe, and extend to the comparable level on the other side. This will make reflection of the scalp considerably easier. Sufficient tissue should be left behind the ear to permit easy sewing of the incision by the mortician.

Scalp incision. Dotted line indicates coronal plane of the primary incision. It starts on right side over the mastoid just behind earlobe and passes over palpable posterolateral ridges of parietal bones to reach opposite mastoid. This line is slightly tilted backward from plane parallel with face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mac Arthur S, Jacobson R, Marrero H, Rahman Z, Schneiderman H. Autopsy removal of the brain in AIDS. A new technique (Correspondence). Hum Pathol 1986;17:1296–1297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Towfighi J, Roberts AF, Foster NE, Abt AB. A protective device for performing cranial autopsies. Hum Pathol 1989;20:288–289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown P. Guidelines for high risk autopsy cases:special precautions for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. In:Autopsy Performance and Reporting. College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL, 1990,pp. 68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Budka H, Aguzzi A, Brown P, Brucher JM, Bugiani O, Gullota F, Haltia M. Tissue handling in suspected Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other human spongiform encephalopathies. Brain Pathol 1995;5:319–322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Isaacson G. Postmortem examination of infant brains (techniques for removal, fixation and sectioning). Arch Pathol Lab Med 1984;108:80–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bass T, Bergevin MA, Werner AL, Liuzzi FJ, Scott DE. Insitufixation of the neonatal brain and spinal cord. Ped Pathol 1993;13:699–705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Okasaki H. Nervous system. In:Ludwig J, ed. Current Methods of Autopsy Practice. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA,1979, pp. 96–129.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wigglesworth JS. Performance of perinatal autopsy. In: Bennington JL, ed. Perinatal Pathology, vol. 15. Major Problems in Pathology. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1984, pp. 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Towbin A. Neonatal neuropathologic examination. In: Tedeschi CO, ed. Neuropathology: Methods and Diagnosis. Little, Brown, Boston, 1970, pp.215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Adams VI. Autopsy technique for neck examination II. Vertebral column and posterior compartment. Pathol Annu 1991;26:211–226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Geddes JF, Gonzales AG. Examination of spinal cord in diseases of the craniocervical junction and high cervical spine. J Clin Pathol 1991;44:170–172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laurence KM, Martin D. Atechnique for obtaining undistorted specimens of the central nervous system. J Clin PathoI 1959;12:188–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheehan HL. Neurohypophysis and hypothalamus. In: Blood worth JMB Jr, ed. Endocrine Pathology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1968, pp. 12–74.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Szanto PB. Amodified technique for the removal of the nasopharynx and accompanying organs of the throat. Arch Pathol 1944;38:313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lamprecht J, Hegemann S, Hauptmann S. Advantages of ENT-specialty-specific autopsy technique [German] HNO 1994;42:233–235.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Temporal Bone Banks Program for Ear Research. Technique for acquiring and preparing the human temporal bone for the study of middle and ear pathology. Tran Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1966;70:871–878.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michaels L, Wells M, Frohlich A. A newtechnique for the study of temporal bone pathology. Clin Otolaryng 1983;8:77–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson SW. Selected Histochemical and Histopathological Methods. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1966, pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tedeschi CG. Neuropathology: Methods and Diagnosis. Little, Brown and Co., Boston, MA, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson RHW, Berson SD. The postmortem diagnosis of diffuse cerebral injuries, with special reference to the importance of brain fixation. S Afr Med J 1987;71:10–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katelaris A, Kencian J, Duflou J, Hilton JMN. Brainat necropsy: to fix or not to fix? J Clin Pathol 1994;47:718–720.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Powers JM. Practice guidelines for autopsy pathology. Autopsy procedures for brain, spinal cord and neuromuscular system. Autopsy Committe of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995;119:777–783.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alafuzoff I, Winblad B. How to run a brain bank:potentials and pitfalls in the use of human post-mortem brain material in research. J Neural Transm 1993;39:235–243.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jean Paul G. Vonsattel Æ Maria Pilar del Amaya Æ Christian E. Keller Twenty-first century brain banking. Processing brains for research: the Columbia University methods. Acta Neuropathol 2007 Nov 6 (Epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lindenberg R. Forensic neuropathology. In: Minckler J, ed. Pathology of the Nervous System. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972, pp. 2726–2740.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen JP, Gaston A, Louarn F, Marsault C, Bargiotas E, Wallman J, Poirier J. CT of brain: technique for comparative postmortem slicing. Am J Neuroradiol 1983;4:191–193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Braak H, Braak E Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta neuropathologica. 1991; 82:239–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Newell KL, Hyman BT, Growdon JH, Hedley-Whyte Application of the National Institute of Aging (NIA)-Reagan Institute criteria for the neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer disease J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1999;58:1147–1155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Love S Postmortem sampling of the brain and other tissues in neurodegenerative disease Histopathol 2004;44:309–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dyck PJ, Dyck PJB, Engelstad J. Pathologic Alterations of Nerves. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK. Peripheral Neuropathy, 4th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2005, pp. 733–830.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Beckwith JB. Sampling of muscle at autopsy in cases of lower motor neuron disease. Am J Clin Pathol 1964;42:92–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Choi SS, Crampton A. Atherosclerosis of arteries of neck: postmortem angiographic and pathologic study. Arch Pathol 1961;72:379–385.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stein BM, Svare GT. A technique of postmortem angiography for evaluating arteriosclerosis of the aortic arch and carotid and vertebral arteries. Radiology 1963;81:252–256.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Karhunen PJ, Mannikko A, Penttila A, Liesto K. Diagnostic angiography in postoperative autopsies. Am J Forens Pathol 1989;10:303–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Thompsett DH, Tedeschi CG. Museumpreparations of brain and spinal cord. In: Tedeschi CG, ed. Neuropathology: Methods and Diagnosis. Little, Brown, Boston, 1970, pp. 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bromilow A, Bums J. Technique for removal of the vertebral arteries. J Clio Pathol 1985;38:1400–1402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Maramattom BV, Giannini C, Manno EM, Wijdicks EF Wegener’s granulomatosis and vertebro-basilar thrombosis Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20:65–8

    Google Scholar 

  38. McCormick WF, Stein BM. Technique for study of extracranial arteries. Arch Pathol 1962;74:52–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giannini, C., Okazaki, H. (2009). Nervous System. In: Waters, B.L. (eds) Handbook of Autopsy Practice. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-127-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-127-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-841-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-127-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics