Abstract
Proper patient selection is critical to a successful outcome for an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). The first key issue we determine is if the urinary incontinence is the result of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. We perform a urodynamics study, as well as leak-point pressure studies to distinguish a bladder etiology from a urinary sphincter etiology. A pressure flow study and flexible cystoscopy are done to evaluate the bladder outlet for obstruction or urethral stricture disease. The presence of overactive or neurogenic bladder by urodynamics demands initial treatment with anticholinergic therapy before any consideration of AUS. Patients who receive an AUS should have good manual dexterity and enough intellectual capacity to properly work the device. This should be evaluated preoperatively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReference
Venn SN, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The long term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol 2000;164:702–707.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brandes, S.B. (2006). US Counterpoint to Chapter 14. In: Johnson, F.E., Virgo, K.S., Lairmore, T.C., Audisio, R.A. (eds) The Bionic Human. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-975-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-975-2_22
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-959-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-975-2
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)