Abstract
Hernia repair in Europe and the United Kingdom is similar to that in the United States. By far the most common hernia repaired with a mesh prosthesis is the inguinal hernia. Other hernias that are repaired with mesh are, in decreasing order, incisional hernias, large umbilical or paraumbilical hernias, femoral hernias, occasionally large epigastric hernias, and less common hernias like large paraesophageal and lumbar hernias. Each year, 70,000 to 80,000 inguinal hernia operations are performed in the United Kingdom (1). Of these, the majority (80–90%) (2,3) have prosthetic mesh inserted to reinforce the repair. Incisional hernias have also increasingly been repaired with mesh rather than sutures, especially large and recurrent hernias (4). Mesh repairs have overtaken simple suture repairs because they yield better results. For suture repairs, there is a quoted recurrence rate of at least 10%, in some series as high as 40% (5). Inguinal hernia repair with mesh has been shown to reduce recurrence rates to as low as 0.1% (6). The history of the evolution of mesh repair follows that of the American experience. The most common mesh used nowadays is made of nonabsorbable polypropylene (Prolene™) or polyester (Mersilene™).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anonymous. Table B 15. Hospital Inpatient Activity: Finished consultant episodes, the most frequently performed operative procedures 1994 to 1998. In: Health and Personal Social Services Statistics, Statistics Division, Department of Health Publication 2003. http://www.doh.gov.uk/HPSSS/TBL_B15.HTM.
Metzger J, Lutz N, Laidlaw I. Guidelines for inguinal hernia repair in everyday practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2001;83:209–214.
Hair A, Duffy K, McLean J, et al. Groin hernia repair in Scotland. Br J Surg 2000;87:1722–1726.
Korenkov M, Sauerland S, Paul A, Neugebauer EA. Incisional hernia repair in Germany at the crossroads: a comparison of two hospital surveys in 1995 and 2001. Zentralbl Chir 2002;127:700–704.
The Danish hernia database-the first year. Ugeskr Laeger 2000;162:1552–1555.
Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Open “tension-free” repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg 1996;162:447–453.
Junge K, Klinge U, Prescher A, Giboni P, Niewiera M, Schumpelick V. Elasticity of the anterior abdominal wall and impact for reparation of incisional hernias using mesh implants. Hernia 2001;5:113–118.
Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Open “tension-free” repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Surg Today 1995;25:619–625.
Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM. Open mesh versus nonmesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;4:CD002197.
Ghadimi B, Langer C, Becker H. The carcinogenic potential of biomaterials in hernia surgery. Chirurg 2002;73(8):833–837.
Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J, et al. Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg 1998;164:951–960.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
A., A. (2006). European Counterpoint to Chapter 12. In: Johnson, F.E., Virgo, K.S., Lairmore, T.C., Audisio, R.A. (eds) The Bionic Human. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-975-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-975-2_17
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-959-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-975-2
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)