The Use of Nitrocellulose Membranes in Lateral-Flow Assays

Part of the Forensic Science and Medicine book series (FSM)


Microporous nitrocellulose membranes are used in lateral-flow assays as the substrate upon which immunocomplexes are formed and visualized to indicate the presence or absence of an analyte in a liquid sample. The pore sizes of membranes used in this application are comparatively large, ranging from 3 to 20 μm. Several attributes have resulted in nitrocellulose being the preferred substrate for lateral-flow assays. First, nitrocellulose adsorbs protein at a high level. Second, chemistries that make the membrane wettable with aqueous solution do not significantly diminish protein adsorption. Third, nitrocellulose membranes can be cast that have pores sufficiently large to allow lateral flow of fluid in a reasonable time. To facilitate the utilization of nitrocellulose in lateral-flow assays, the membrane can be cast directly onto a polyester backing. The backing does not interfere with the function of the nitrocellulose while significantly improving its handling properties. Optimal performance of nitrocellulose membranes requires an understanding of the interactions of test reagents with the nitrocellulose and the effects of reagent location on assay sensitivity.


Lateral Flow Test Strip Test Line Detector Particle Liquid Stream 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Miles FD. Cellulose Nitrate. Interscience, New York, NY: 1955.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beer HH, Jallerat E, Pflanz K, and Klewitz TM. Qualification of cellulose nitrate membranes for lateral-flow assays. IVD Technology 2002;8:35–42.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Southern EM. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 1975;98:503–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldberg DA. Isolation and partial characterization of the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980;77:5794–5799.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Towbin H, Staehelin T, and Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets—procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979;76:4350–5354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zuk R and Litman DJ. Immunochromatographic assay with support having bound “MIP” and second enzyme. US Patent 4,435,504 1984.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell RL, Wagner D.B, and O’Connell JP. Solid phase assay with visual readout. US Patent 4,703,017, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenstein RW, and Bloomster TG. Solid phase assay employing capillary flow. US Patent 4,855,240. 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiss A. Concurrent engineering for lateral-flow diagnostics. IVD Technology 1999;5:48–57.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Millipore Corporation. Rapid Lateral Flow Test Strips: Considerations for Product Development. Lit. No. TB500EN00. Bedford, MA: 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones KD. Troubleshooting protein binding in nitrocellulose membranes. IVD Technology 1999;5:32–41.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pitt AM. The nonspecific protein binding of polymeric microporous membranes. J Parenteral Sci Tech 1987;41:110–113.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Millipore CorporationDanvers

Personalised recommendations