Skip to main content

Cardiac Arrhythmia Assessment in Phase IV Clinical Studies

  • Chapter
Cardiac Safety of Noncardiac Drugs

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of a pharmaceutical product is evaluated during product development; however, safety surveillance must continue after marketing. One principal tool for postmarketing safety surveillance is the analysis of spontaneous (nontrial based) adverse reaction reports. Formal studies, either experimental or observational in design, are other means to further assess an approved product’s safety. Although the term “phase IV studies” is used to describe studies conducted after a drug is marketed, this term does not reflect a particular study design. Epidemiologic cohort studies conducted in administrative databases are examples of study designs used to examine the safety of new products. Other powerful study designs, such as large and simplified clinical trials (SCTs), may also provide safety and effectiveness data to supplement pre-approval information. The purpose of this chapter is to describe limitations of the drug approval process and to discuss post-marketing methods useful for assessing cardiac arrhythmias, particularly as related to QTc interval prolongation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mathieu M. New Drug Development: A Regulatory Overview, 4th ed. Waltham, MA: Parexel International Corp., 1997

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liberman UA, Hirsch LJ. Esophagitis and alendronate. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1069–1070.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meinert CL. Clinical Trials. Design, Conduct and Analysis. NY: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faich GA. Adverse drug reaction monitoring. New Engl J Med 1986;314:1589–1592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Faich GA. US adverse drug reaction surveillance 1989-1994. Pharmacoepidem and Drug Safety 1996;5:393–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. FDA/Pharma Task Force to Assess QT Risk, FDC Weekly (Pink Sheet). Nov 1, 1999, pp. 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michels KB, Faich GA. Linked databases and epidemiology, J Clinical Research and Pharmacoepidemiology 1991;5:11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hennessy S, Bilker W, Knauss JS, Margolis DJ, Kimmel S, et al. Cardiac arrest and ventricular arrhythmia in patients taking antipsychotic drugs. Brit Med J 2002;325:1070.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanrahan JP, Choo PW, Carlson W, Greineder D, Faich GA, Platt R. Terfenadine-associated ventricular arrhythmias and QTc interval prolongation. A retrospective cohort comparison with other antihistamines among members of a health maintenance organization. Ann Epidemiol 1995;5:201–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lesko SM, Mitchell AA. Use of randomized controlled trials for phramacoepidemiology studies. In Pharmacoepidemiology 3rd ed. Strom BL, ed. NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2000, pp. 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R. Why do we need some large simple randomized trials? Stat in Med 1984;3:409–420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peto R, Collins R, Gray R, Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:23–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellenberg S, Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Data Monitoring Committees in Clinical Trials. NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Franceis T, Korns R, Voight R, et al. An evaluation of the 1954 poliomyelitis vaccine trails. Am J Public Health 1955;45:1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steering Committee of the Physicians Health Study Research Group. Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians Health Study. New Engl J Med 1989;321:129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lesko SM, Mitchell AA. An assessment of the safety of pediatric ibuprofen. A practitioner-based randomized clinical trial. J Amer Med Assoc 1996;275:986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Castle W, Fuller R, Hall J, Palmer R. Comparison of salmeterol with salbutamol. J Brit Med 1993;306:1034–1037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Faich GA, Morganroth J, Whitehouse AB, Brar JS, Arcuri P, Kowalshy SF, Haverstock DC, Celesk, RA, Church DA. Clinical experience with moxifloxacin in patients with respiratory tract infections. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:140.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kessler D, Rose L, Temple R. et al. Seeding trials—Therapeutic class wars—drug promotion. New Engl J Med 1994;331:1350–1353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Faich, G.A., Stemhagen, A. (2005). Cardiac Arrhythmia Assessment in Phase IV Clinical Studies. In: Morganroth, J., Gussak, I. (eds) Cardiac Safety of Noncardiac Drugs. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-884-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics