Gender Selection

Separating Fact From Fiction
  • David S. Karabinus
  • Keith L. Blauer
Part of the Contemporary Endocrinology book series (COE)


The mechanisms and possibilities of controlling or predetermining the sex of offspring are likely to have been pondered by humans throughout history. Different cultures, social classes, and races may exhibit different preferences for a child of a given sex. Chromosomal sex is determined at fertilization by the heterogametic parent. For humans, the male is the heterogametic parent, producing both X and Y chromosome-bearing sperm. The mechanisms of meiosis in the production of gametes by the heterogametic parent should, in theory, yield an equal number of male and female offspring. Because the human sex ratio is almost 50:50, it appears that the sex ratio of babies born primarily reflects the ratio of X- and Y-bearing sperm in semen and is probably not significantly impacted by other factors, such as the female reproductive tract environment or differential fetal survival to birth.


Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Sperm Head Motile Sperm Gender Selection Sperm Separation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shettles LB, Rorvik D. How to Choose the Sex of Your Baby. Broadway Books, New York, NY, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effect on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 1995;333: 1517–1521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chesterman-Phillips H. Boy or Girl: You Choose. Thorsons Publications Ltd, Northamptonshire, UK, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hilsenrath RE, Swarup M, Bischoff FZ, et al. Effect of sexual abstinence on the proportion of X-bearing sperm as assessed by multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization. Fertil Steril 1997;68:510–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papa F, Henrion R, Breart G. Preconceptional selection of sex using the ionic method. Dietary regime. Results of a 2 years’ prospective clinical study. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1983;12:415–422.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seguy B. Methods of natural and voluntary sex selection. Value for the prevention of sex-linked malformations and of certain recurrent abortions. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1975;4:145–149.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abbasi K. The spin on sperm. BMJ 1997;315:1386.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ericsson RJ, Langevin CN, Nishino M. Isolation of fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature 1973;246: 421–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ericsson RJ. X and Y spermatozoa. Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris) 1976;4:655–668.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quinlivan WLG, Preciado K, Long TL, Sullivan H. Separation of human X and Y spermatozoa by albumin gradients and Sephadex chromatography. Fertil Steril 1982;37:104–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beernink FJ, Dmwoski WP, Ericsson RJ. Sex preselection through albumin separation of sperm. Fertil Steril 1993;59(2):382–386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corson, SL, Batzer FR, Alexander NJ, et al. Sex selection by sperm separation and insemination. Fertil Steril 1984;42:756–760.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaffe S, Jewelewicz R, Wahl E, Khatamee, MA. A controlled study for gender selection. Fertil Steril 1991;56:254–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rose GA, Wong A. Experiences in Hong Kong with the theory and practice of the albumin column method of sperm separation for sex selection. Hum Reprod 1998;13:146–149. Erratum in Hum Reprod 1998;13:1414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Kooij RJ, van Oost BA. Determination of sex ratio of spermatozoa with deoxyribonucleic acid-probe and quinacrine staining: a comparison. Fertil Steril 1992;58(2):384–386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang HX, Flaherty SP, Swann NJ, Matthews CD. Discontinuous Percoll gradients enrich X-bearing human spermatozoa: a study using double-labeled fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod 1994;9: 1265–1270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aribarg A, Ngeamvijawat J, Chanprasit Y, Sukcharoen N. Determination of the ratio of X and Y bearing spermatozoa after albumin gradient method using double-labeled fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). J Med Assoc Thai 1996;79(Suppl 1):S88–S95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Flaherty SP, Matthews CD. Application of modern molecular techniques to evaluate sperm sex selection methods. Mol Hum Reprod 1997;2:937–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen Mj, Guu HF, Ho ES. Efficiency of sex pre-selection of spermatozoa by albumin method evaluated by double-labeled fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1920–1926.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin SP, Lee RK, Tsai YJ, et al. Separating X-bearing human spermatozoa through a discontinuous density gradient proved to be inefficient by double-label fluorescent in situ hybridization. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998;15: 565–569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Check ML, Bollendorf A, Check JH, et al. Separation of sperm through a 12-layer percoll column decreases the percentage of sperm staining with crinacrine. Arch Androl 2000; 44:47–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaneko S, Yamaguchi J, Kobayashi T, Iizuka R. Separation of human X-and Y-bearing sperm using percoll density gradient centrifugation. Fertil Steril 1983;40(5):661–665.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Corson SL, Batzer FR, Schlaff S. Preconceptual female gender selection. Fertil Steril 1983;40: 384,385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beckett TA, Martin RH, Hoar DI. Assessment of the sephadex technique for selection of X-bearing human sperm by analysis of sperm chromosomes, deoxyribonucleic acid, and Y-bodies. Fertil Steril 1989;52:829–835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vidal F, Moragas M, Catala V, et al. Sephadex filtration and human serum albumin gradients do not select spermatozoa by sex chromosome: a fluorescent in situ hybridization study. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1740–1743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Check JH, Katsoff D. A Prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of modified swim-up preparation for male sex selection. Hum Reprod 1993;8:211–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khatamee MA, Horn SR, Weseley A, et al. A controlled study for gender selection using swim-up separation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1999;48:7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Jonge CJ, Flaherty SP, Barnes AM, et al. Failure of multitube sperm swim-up for sex preselection. Fertil Steril 1997;67:1109–1114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Flaherty SP, Michalowska J, Swann NJ, et al. Albumin gradients do not enrich Y-bearing spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1997;12:938–942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reubinoff BE, Schenker JG. New advances in sex preselection. Fertil Steril 1996;66:343–350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Ethics. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Sex Selection. Committee Opinion 177, AGOG, Washington D.C., 1996.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertil Steril 2001;75:861–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Sex Selection: Report Summary. Available at: Accessed 2003.
  34. 34.
    Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Sex Selection: Options for Regulation. Available at: http://www/ mainreport.pdf. Accessed 2003.
  35. 35.
    Moruzzi JF. Selecting a mamalian species for the separation of X-and Y-chromosome-bearing spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1979;57:319–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pinkel D, Gledhill BL, Van Dilla MA, et al. High resolution DNA measurements of mammalian sperm. Cytometry 1982;3:1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Johnson LA, Flook JP, Look MV, et al. Flow sorting of X and Y chromosome-bearing spermatozoa into two populations. Gamete Res 1987;16:1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Johnson LA, Flook JP, Hawk HW. Sex preselection in rabbits: live births from X and Y sperm separated by DNA and cell sorting. Biol Reprod 1989;41:199–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johnson LA. Sex preselection in swine: altered sex ratios in offspring following surgical insemination of flow sorted X-and Y-bearing sperm. Reprod Domest Anim 1991;26:309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cran DG, Johnson LA, Miller NGA, et al. Production of bovine calves following separation of X-and Y-chromosome bearing sperm and in vitro fertilization. Vet Rec 1993;132:40–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cran DG, Cochrane DJ, Johnson LA, et al. Separation of X-and Y-chromosome bearing bovine sperm by flow cytometry for use in IVF. Theriogenology 1994;41:183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Johnson LA, Welch GR, Keyvanfar K, et al. Gender preselection in humans? Flow cytometric separation of X and Y spermatozoa for the prevention of X-linked diseases. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1733–1739.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sumner AT, Robinson JA. A difference in dry mass between the heads of X-and Y-bearing human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fert 1976;48:9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Levinson G, Keyvanfar K, Wu JC, et al. DNA-based X-enriched sperm separation as an adjunct to preimplantation genetic testing for the prevention of X-linked disease. Hum Reprod 1995;10:979–982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fugger EF, Black SH, Keyvanfar K, Schulman JD. Births of normal daughters after MicroSort sperm separation and intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998;30: 2367–2370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schlaff WD. New ways to prepare semen for IUI. Contemp Ob Gyn 1987;29:79–86.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Johnson LA, Pinkel D. Modification of a laser-based flow cytometer for high resolution DNA analysis of mammalian spermatozoa. Cytometry 1986;7:268–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Johnson, LA, Welch GR. Sex preselection: high speed flow cytometric sorting of X-and Y-sperm for maximum efficiency. Theriogenology 1999;52:1323–1341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Johnson LA. Sexing mammalian sperm for production of offspring: the state-of-the-art. Animal Reprod Sci 2000;60,61:93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Seidel GE, Garner DL. Current status of sexing mammalian spermatozoa. Reproduction 2002;124: 733–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ventura SJ, Mosher WD, Curtin SC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in Pregnancy Rates for the United States, 1976–97: An Update. National Vital Statistics Reports 2001;49(4):1–12.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health. Atlanta, GA. Available at: Accessed 2003.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Marden PM, Smith DW, McDonald MJ. Congenital malformations in the infant, including minor variations. J Pediatrics 1964;64:357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RML. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA-amplification. Nature 1990;344:768–770.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Thirteen years’ experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: report of the Fifth International Symposium on Preimplantation Genetics. RBM Online 2004; 8:no. 2.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Harton GL, Karabinus D, Fallon LA, et al. Embryo outcome as determined by preimplantation genetic diagnosis after fertilization utilizing unsorted sperm vs. MicroSort® sorted sperm. Fertil Steril 2003;80(Suppl 3):199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David S. Karabinus
    • 1
  • Keith L. Blauer
    • 2
  1. 1.Genetics and IVF InstituteFairfax
  2. 2.Reproductive Care CenterSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations