Skip to main content

Emergency Medicine

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reviews some general medical and legal principles, most of which are important regardless of medical specialty. They are particularly relevant to emergency physicians but are also important to physicians from other specialties who treat patients in the emergency department (ED). I then discuss some specific emergency medical conditions that often result in litigation. The topics presented are not meant to be an exhaustive list of potential liability problems, but rather a sample of some of the more common issues that confront physicians and their patients.

Key Words

  • Emergency
  • emergency medicine
  • emergency department
  • medical-legal
  • risk management

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested Readings

  1. Schumacher JE, Ritchey FJ, Nelson LT 3rd. Malpractice litigation fear and risk management beliefs among teaching hospital physicians. South Med J 1995; 88(12):1204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ransom SB, Dombrowski MP, Shephard R, Leonardi M. The economic cost of the medical-legal tort system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174(6):1903.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan TA, Sox CM, Burstin HR. Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med 1966;33(26): 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bovbjerg RR, Petronis KR. The relationship between physicians’ malpractice claims history and later claims: does the past predict the future? JAMA 1994;272(18): 1421.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Variation in expert opinion in medical malpractice review. Anesthesiology 1996;85(5):1049.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hyams AL, Brandenburg JA, Lipsitz SR, Shapiro DW, Brennan TA. Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: a two-way street. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122(6):450.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies. Website: http://accep.org.

  8. Karcz A, Holbrook J, Auerbach BS, et al. Preventability of malpractice claims in emergency medicine: A closed claims study. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19(8):865.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson LA, Derlet RW. Conflicts between managed care organizations and emergency departments in California. West J Med 1996;164(2):137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Derlet RW, Hamilton B. The impact of health maintenance organization care authorization policy on an emergency department before California’s new managed care law. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3(4):338.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lerman B, Kobernick MS. Return visits to the emergency department. J Emerg Med 1987;5(5):359.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirsch H. Legal implications of patient records. South Med J 1979;72(6):726.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prosser RL Jr. Alteration of medical records submitted for medicolegal review. JAMA 1992;276(19):2630.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Powers RD. Emergency department patient literacy and the readability of patient-directed materials. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17(2):124.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Simel DL, Feussner JR. Does determining serum alcohol concentrations in emergency department patients influence physicians’ civil suit liability? Arch intern Med 1989;149(5)1016.

    CrossRef  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin CA, Wilson JF, Fiebelman ND 3rd, Gurley DN, Miller TW. Physicians’ psychologic reactions to malpractice litigation. South Med J. 1991; 84(11):1300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lester GW, Smith SG. Listening and talking to patients: a remedy for malpractice suits? West J Med 1993;158(3):268.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bresler, M.J. (2005). Emergency Medicine. In: Anderson, R.E. (eds) Medical Malpractice. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-845-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-845-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-389-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-845-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics