Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disorders Erroneously Considered as Vascular Neoplasms

  • Chapter
Book cover Pathology of Vascular Skin Lesions

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Pathology ((CCPATH))

  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

Table 1 summarizes a series of disparate disorders that have been erroneously considered as vascular neoplasms and are described in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kimura T, Yoshimura S, Ishikama E. On the unusual granulation combined with hyperplastic changes of lymphatic tissues. Trans Soc Pathol Jpn 1948;37:178–80.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kung ITM, Gibson JB, Bannatyne PM. Kimura’s disease: a clinicopathological study of 21 cases and its distinction from angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Pathology 1984;16:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Googe PB, Harris NL, Mihn, MC Jr. Kimura’ s disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: two distinct histopathological entities. J Cutan Pathol 1987;14:263–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Urabe A, Tsuneyoshi M, Enjoji M. Epithelioid hemangioma versus Kimura’ s disease: a comparative clinicopathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol 1987;11:758–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuo T-T, Shih L-Y, Chan H-L. Kimura’s disease. Involvement of regional lymph nodes and distinction from angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12:843–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan JKC, Ng CS, Yuen NWF, Kung ITM, Gwi G. Epithelioid hemangioma (angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia) and Kimura’s disease in Chinese. Histopathology 1989;15:557–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hui PK, Chan JK, Ng CS, et al. Lymphadenopathy of Kimura’ s disease. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13:177–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chun SI, Ji HG. Kimura’ s disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: clinical and histopathologic differences. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;27:954–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wells GC, Whimster IW. Subcutaneous angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia. Br J Dermatol 1969;81:1–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reed RJ, Terazakis N. Subcutaneous angioblastic lymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (Kimura’ s disease). Cancer 1972;29:489–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim BM, Sithian N, Cucolo GF. Subcutaneous angiolymphoid hyperplasia (Kimura’s disease). Report of a case. Arch Surg 1975;110:1246–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buchner A, Silverman Jr S, Wara WM, Hansnen LS. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (Kimura’ s disease). Oral Surg 1980;49:309–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson JW, Colman M, Williamson C, Ward PH. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia of the external ear canal. Treatment with laser excision. Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:316–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen TG, Helwig EB. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: a clinicopathologic study of 116 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985;12:781–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisenberg, E, Lowlicht R. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophils: a clinicopathologic conference. J Oral Pathol 1985;14:216–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosai J, Gold J, Landy R. The histiocytoid hemangiomas. A unifying entity embracing several previously described entities of the skin, soft tissue, large vessels, bone, and heart. Hum Pathol 1979; 10:707–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosai J. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia of the skin. Its nosological position in the spectrum of the histiocytoid hemangioma. Am J Dermatopathol 1982;4:175–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Helander SD, Peters MS, Kuo T-T, Su WPD. Kimura’ s disease and angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia: new observations from immunohistochemical studies of lymphocyte markers, endothelial antigens, and granulocyte proteins. J Cutan Pathol 1995;22:319–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Katagiri K, Itami S, Hatano Y, Yamaguchi T, Takayasu S. In vivo expression of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IFN-gamma mRNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and effect of cyclosporin A in a patient with Kimura’ s disease. Br J Dermatol 1997;137:972–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sugaya M, Suzuki T, Asahina A, Nakamura K, Ohtsuki M, Tamaki K. Kimura’ s disease associated with ulcerative colitis: detection of IL-5 mRNA expression of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and colon lesion. Acta Derm Venereol 1998;78:375–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hongcharu W, Baldassano M, Taylor CR. Kimura’ s disease with oral ulcers: response to pentoxifylline. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;43:905–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss SW, Enzinger FM. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. A vascular tumor often mistaken for a carcinoma. Cancer 1982;50:970–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weiss SW, Ishak KG, Dial DH, Sweet DE, Enzinger FM. Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and related lesions. Semin Diagn Pathol 1986;3:259–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong KT, Shamsol S. Quantitative study of mast cells in Kimura’s disease. J Cutan Pathol 1999;26:13–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Aoki M, Kawana S. The ultrastructural patterns of mast cell degranulation in Kimura’s disease. Dermatology 1999;199:35–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jang KA, Ahn SJ, Choi JH, et al. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for human herpesvirus 8 and heteroduplex PCR for clonality assessment in angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia and Kimura’ s disease. J Cutan Pathol 2001;28:363–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagore E, Llorca J, Sanchez-Motilla JM, Ledesma E, Fortea JM, Aliaga A. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in a patient with Kimura’ s disease. Int J Dermatol 2000;39:618–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaneko K, Aoki M, Hattori S, Sato M, Kawana S. Successful treatment of Kimura’ s disease with cyclosporine. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:893–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wick MR, Rocamora A. Reactive and malignant “angioendotheliomatosis”: a discriminant clinicopathologic study. J Cutan Pathol 1988;15:260–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ansell J, Bhawan J, Cohen S, et al. Histiocytic lymphoma and malignant angioendotheliomatosis. One disease or two? Cancer 1982;50:1506–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Scott PWB, Silvers DN, Helwig EB. Proliferating angioendotheliomatosis. Arch Pathol 1975;99:323–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Braverman I, Lerner AB. Diffuse malignant proliferation of vascular endothelium. A possible new clinical and pathologic entity. Arch Dermatol 1961;84:72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yamamura Y, Akamizu H, Hirata T, Kito S, Hamada T. Malignant lymphoma presenting with neoplastic angioendotheliosis of the central nervous system. Clin Neuropathol 1983:2:62–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wick MR, Scheithaver BW, Okazaki H, et al. Cerebral angioendotheliomatosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1982;106:342–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bhawan J, Wolff SM, Ucci AA, et al. Malignant lymphoma and malignant angioendotheliomatosis: one disease. Cancer 1985;55:570–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dominguez FE, Rosen LB, Kramer HC. Malignant angioendotheliomatosis proliferans. Am J Dermatopathol 1986;8:419–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sheibani K, Battifora H, Winberg CD, et al. Further evidence that “malignant angioendotheliomatosis” is an angiotropic large-call lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1986;314:943–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Willemze R, Kroyswijk MRJ, Debruin CD, et al. Angiotropic (intravascular) large cell lymphoma of the skin previously classified as malignant angioendotheliomatosis. Br J Dermatol 1987;116:393–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wrotnowski U, Mills SE, Cooper PH. Malignant angioendotheliomatosis. An angiotropic lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1985;83:244–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wick MR, Mills SE, Scheithauer BW, et al. Reassessment of malignant “angioendotheliomatosis:” evidence in favor of its reclassification as “intravascular lymphomatosis.” Am J Surg Pathol 1986;10:112–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fulling KH, Gersell DJ. Neoplastic angioendotheliomatosis: histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural findings in two cases. Cancer 1982;51:1107–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Carroll TJ, Schelper RL, Goeken JA, et al. Neoplastic angioendotheliomatosis: immunopathologic and morphologic evidence for intravascular malignant lymphomatosis. Am J Clin Pathol 1986;85:169–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mori S, Itoyama S, Mohri N, et al. Cellular characteristics of neoplastic angioendotheliomatosis. An immunohistochemical marker study of 6 cases. Virchows Arch Pathol Anat 1985;407:167–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ferry JA, Harris NL, Picker LJ, et al. Intravascular lymphomatosis (malignant angioendotheliomatosis). A B-cell neoplasm expressing surface homing receptor. Mod Pathol 1988;1:444–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Otrakji CL, Voight W, Amador A, et al. Malignant angioendotheliomatosis: a true lymphoma. A case of intravascular malignant lymphomatosis studied by Southern blot hybridization analysis. Hum Pathol 1988;19:475–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bhawan J. Angioendotheliomatosis proliferans systemisata: an angiotropic neoplasm of lymphoid origin. Semin Diagn Pathol 1987;4:18–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Petroff N, Koger OW, Fleming MG, et al. Malignant angioendotheliomatosis: an angiotropic lymphoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:727–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Molina A, Lombard C, Donlon T, Bangs CD, Dorfman RF. Immunohistochemical and cytogenetic studies indicate that malignant angioendotheliomatosis is a primary intravascular (angiotropic) lymphoma. Cancer 1990;66:474–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sepp N, Schuler G, Romani N, et al. “Intravascular lymphomatosis” (angioendotheliomatosis): evidence for a T-cell origin in two cases. Hum Pathol 1990;21:1051–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hisashi T, Tadaaki E, Toyohiro T, Masuzou K, Yokio F, Syouji K. Congenital angiotropic lymphoma (intravascular lymphomatosis) of the T-cell type. Cancer 1991;67:2131–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kitagawa M, Matsubara 0, Song SY, et al. Neoplastic angioendotheliomatosis. Immunohistochemical and electron microscopic findings in three cases. Cancer 1985;56:1134–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Petito CK, Gottlieb GJ, Dougherty JH, et al. Neoplastic angioendotheliomatosis: Ultrastructural study and review of the literature. Ann Neurol 1978;3:393–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Keahey TM, Guerry D IV, Tuthill RJ, Bondi EE. Malignant angioendotheliomatosis prolifeerans treated with doxorubicin. Arch Dermatol 1982;118:512–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Setoyama M, Mizoguchi S, Orikawa T, Tashiro M. A case of intravascular malignant lymphomatosis (angiotropic large-cell lymphoma) presenting memory T-cell phenotype and its expression of adhesion molecules. J Dermatol 1992;19:263–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Sangueza O, Hyder DM, Sangueza P. Intravascular lymphomatosis: report of an unusual case with T-cell phenotype occurring in an adolescent male. J Cutan Pathol 1992;19:226–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kamesaki H, Matsui Y, Ohno Y, et al. Single case report: angiocentric lymphoma with histologic features of neoplastic angioendotheliomatosis presenting with predominant respiratory and hematologic manifestations. Am J Clin Pathol 1990;94:768–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rubin MA, Cossman J, Freter CE, Azumi N. Intravascular large cell lymphoma coexisting within hemangiomas of the skin. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:860–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ramsay B, Dahl MGC, Malcolm AJ, Soyer HP, Wilson Jones E. Acral pseudolymphomatous angiokeratoma of children (APACHE). Br J Dermatol 1988;119(suppl 33):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ramsay B, Dahl MGC, Malcolm AJ, Wilson Jones E. Acral pseudolymphomatous angiokeratoma of children. Arch Dermatol 1990:126:1524–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hara M, Matsunaga J, Tagami H. Acral pseudolymphomatous angiokeratoma of children (APACHE): a case report and immunohistologic study. Br J Dermatol 1991;124:387–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Kaddu S, Cerroni L, Pilatti A, Soyer HP, Kerl H. Acral pseudolymphomatous angiokeratoma. A variant of cutaneous pseudolymphomas. Am J Dermatopathol 1994;16:130–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Omar P. Sangüeza MD

  2. Department of Dermatology Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain

    Luis Requena MD

Authors
  1. Omar P. Sangüeza MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luis Requena MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sangüeza, O.P., Requena, L. (2003). Disorders Erroneously Considered as Vascular Neoplasms. In: Pathology of Vascular Skin Lesions. Current Clinical Pathology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-360-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-360-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-407-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-360-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation