Skip to main content

Enter the Elderly Woman as Citizen

The Implications of a Feminist Ethics of Care

  • Chapter
Care of the Aged

Part of the book series: Biomedical Ethics Reviews ((BER))

  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

In most Western societies, age is an important dimension of personal identity and social status. Although we often refer to persons over 65 as elderly, or senior citizens, age designators do not stand alone. Age intersects with other demographic indicators. What is contested is the significance of these indicators. It is now commonplace to observe that elderly people, because they have long personal as well as social biographies, are very diverse. Yet this acknowledgedfact gets lost in policies and programs that refer to the “Care of the Aged” or “Senior Citizens” or “The Elderly.” Indeed, age might be considered a minor commonality as one views this group within the context of a society where income, gender, racial—ethnic origins, sexuality, geographical location, and ability are major definers of the quality of life that one can expect in old age. The category of old age reflects within it the full range of privilege and oppression existent in the broader society. Some groups of elderly persons do quite well, whereas others fair poorly. Thus, any analysis of aging is necessarily partial.

In this chapter, I focus on the situation of a particular group of women, and some men, as they age. This subgroup has the following markers: It is, of course, primarily female, many live with chronic health problems, have low incomes, and often live alone, albeit usually with some support from family and friends. Although much of this chapter assumes a North American context, the policy and ethical questions of an aging population are even more pressing in non-Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, where policy possibilities are far more limited. I make the argument that it is social policies, as operationalized through access, funding, allocation, and program components that result in certain elderly citizens being put at risk or, in the language of World Health Organization (WHO), vulnerable. It is not the demographic markers. Alternative explanations are considered in the form of a feminist ethics of care. The final section of the chapter outlines an alternative basis for long-term care policies that would be less oppressive to women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. United, Nations (2001) The Ageing of the World’s Population, United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. United, Nations (2000) Expert Group Meeting on Sustainable Social Structures in a Society for All Ages. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gibson, D. (1996) Broken down by age and gender: the “problem of of old women” redefined. Gender Soc. 10(4), 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barer, M. L., Evans, R. G., Hertzman, C. (1995) Avalanche or glacier? Health care and the demographic rhetoric. Can. J. Aging 14(2), 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robertson, A. (1997) Beyond apocalyptic demography: toward a moral economy of independence. Ageing Soc. 17(4), 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans, R. G., McGrail, K. M., Morgan, S., et al. (2001) Apocolypse NO: Population aging and the future of health care systems, SRDAP Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, Report # 59.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drache, D. and Sullivan, T., eds. (1999) Health Reform: Public Success, Private Failure. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dryden, D. and Associates, D. (1999) Health Service Utilization in the Population Aged 65 and Older: Review of the Literature, The Alberta Centre for Health Services Utilization Research, Edmonton, Alberta, March 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lister, R. (1997) Citizenship: towards a feminist synthesis. Feminist Rev. 57, 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Seymor, J. (2001) Paying the Price: Carers, Poverty and Social Exclusion, Child Poverty Action Group & Carers UK, London.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baines, C., Evans, P., Neysmith, S. (1998) Women’s caring: work expanding, state contracting, in Women’s Caring: Feminist Perspectives on Social Welfare, Baines, C., Evans, P., and Neysmith S., eds., Oxford University Press; Toronto, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hooyman, N. R. and Gonyea, J. (1995) Feminist Perspectives on Family Care: Policies for Gender Justice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Armstrong, P. and Kits, O. (2001) Hundred Years of Caregiving, Law Commission of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neysmith, S. and Reitsma-Street, M. (2000) Valuing unpaid work in the third sector: the case of community resource centres. Can. Public Policy 26(3), 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Statistics Canada. (1996) 1996 Census. Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, B. (1990) Gender differences in spouse management of the caregiver role, in Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, Abel, E. and Nelson, M., eds. State University of New York Press; Albany, pp. 92–104.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Finch, J. and Groves, D., eds. (1983) A Labour of Love: Women, Work and Caring. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas, C. (1993) De-constructing concepts of care. Sociology 27(4), 649–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris, J. (1993) Feminism and Disability. Feminist Rev. 43, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swain, J., Finkelstein, V., French, S., et al., eds. (1993) Disabling Barriers: Enabling Environments, Sage/The Open University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson, G. (2001) Conceptual frameworks and emancipatory research in social gerontology. Ageing and Soc. 21(4), 471–477.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boxer, M. (2000) Unruly knowledge: women’s studies and the problem of disciplinarity.” NAWS J. 12(2), 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hirschmann, N. (1992) Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koehn, D. (1998) Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care, Trust and Empathy, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bowden, P. (1997) Caring: Gender-Sensitive Ethics, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clement, G. (1996) Care, Autonomy, and Justice: Feminism and the Ethics of Care, Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gordon, S. (1996) Feminism and caring, in Caregiving: Readings in Knowledge, Practice, Ethics and Politics. Gordon, S., Benner, P. and Noddings, N., eds. University of Philadephia Press, Philadelphia, pp. 256–277.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Larabee, M., ed. (1993) An Ethic of Care: Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for the Ethic of Care, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sherwin, S. (1992) No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Aronson, J. and Neysmith, S. (1997) The retreat of the state and longterm care provision: implications for frail elderly people, unpaid family carers and paid home care workers. Stud. Polit. Econ. 53, 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Neysmith, S. and McAdam, M. (1999) Controversial concepts, in Critical Issues for Future Social Work Practice with Aging Persons, Neysmith, S., ed. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Neysmith, S., ed. (2000) Restructuring Caring Labour: Discourse, State Practice and Everyday Life, Oxford University Press, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hill Collins, P. (1998) Fighting Words: Black Women & the Search for Justice, University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Aronson, J. and Neysmith, S. (2001) Manufacturing social exclusion in the home care market.” Can. Public Policy 27(2), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bryne, D. (1999) Social Exclusion, Open University, Buckingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Littlewood, P. and Herkommer, S. (1999) Identifying social exclusion: some problems of meaning, in Social Exclusion in Europe: Problems and Paradigms. Littlewood, P., ed. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Room, G. J. (1995) Poverty and social exclusion: the new european agenda for policy and research, in Beyond the Threshold: The Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion, Room, G., ed. The Policy Press, Bristol, UK, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tully, J. (1999) The agonic freedom of citizens. Econ. Soc. 28(2), 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Orme, J. (2001) Gender and Community Care: Social Work and Social Care Perspectives, Palgrave, Houndmills, Hampshire, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Flax, J. (1992) Beyond Equality: gender justice and difference, in Beyond Equality and Diifference: Citizenship, Feminist Politics and Female Subjectivity. Bornat, J. and James, S., eds. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Johansson, L. (2000) From Policy to Practice: The Swedish Model, Share the Care, 2nd International Conference on Caring, March 20, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997) The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fraser, N. (1989) Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Helpage International (1999) Participation and Ageing: A Position Paper, HelpAge International, London.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Helpage International (2000) Equal Treatment, Equal Rights, HelpAge International, London.

    Google Scholar 

  49. HelpAge International (2000) Gender and Ageing: A Position Paper, HelpAge International, London.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Morris, M. (2001) Gender-sensitive home and community care and caregiving research: a synthesis paper. Health Canada. Women’s Health Bureau, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Armstrong, P. (2001) The evidence is in...it’s time to act on home care. Press release. November 15, 2001. Charlettetown PEI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neysmith, S.M. (2003). Enter the Elderly Woman as Citizen. In: Humber, J.M., Almeder, R.F. (eds) Care of the Aged. Biomedical Ethics Reviews. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-349-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-349-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-444-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-349-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics