Skip to main content

Abuscreen ONTRAK Tests for Drugs of Abuse

  • Chapter
  • 127 Accesses

Part of the book series: Forensic Science and Medicine ((FSM))

Abstract

The desire to have noninstrument on-site immunodiagnostic assays for drugs of abuse was fulfilled by the Abuscreen ONTRAK® assays manufactured by Roche Diagnostics Systems. Launched in the spring of 1989, this product was the first to allow non-technical, trained personnel to analyze a urine specimen for drugs of abuse at the site of collection. The list cost of an ONTRAK assay was $385.00 for a 100 test kit. Pricing was dependent upon purchasing contracts and volume purchased (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Phillips, J. (1999) Personal Communication, Marketing, Roche Diagnostics Systems, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roche Diagnostic Systems, I., Somerville, NJ, ONTRAK package inserts.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armbruster, D. A. and J. M. Krolak (1992) Screening for drugs of abuse with the Roche ONTRAK assays. J. Anal. Toxicol. 16, 172–175.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrara, S. D., et al. (1994) Drugs-of-abuse testing in urine: statistical approach and experimental comparison of immunochemical and chromatographic techniques. J. Anal. Toxicol. 18, 278–291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Belfer, R. A., et al. (1996) Emergency department evaluation of a rapid assay for detection of cocaine metabolites in urine specimens. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 12, 113–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwartz, J. G., et al. (1991) Accuracy of common drug screen tests. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 9, 166–170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, D. P., et al. (1991) Evaluation of Abuscreen ONTRAK Assays: Correlation with RIA and GC/MS, in American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Meeting Program, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baker, D. P., et al. (1991) Evaluation of Abuscreen ONTRAK assays: Correlation between clinically trained personnel and non-clinical personnel in the field, inAmerican Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Meeting Program, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crouch, D. J., et al. (1998) A multiple-site laboratory evaluation of three on-site urinalysis drug-testing devices. J. Anal. Toxicol. 22, 493–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Welch, E., et al. (1993) Rapid cocaine screening of urine in a newborn nursery. J. Pediatr. 123, 468–470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Birnbach, D. J., et al. (1997) Cocaine screening of parturients without prenatal care: an evaluation of a rapid screening assay. Anesth. Analg. 84, 76–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaferstein, H. and G. Sticht (1990) (Comparative studies of drug detection using recent immunologic methods). Beitr. Gerichtl. Med. 48, 51–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson, C. A., M. Morrison, and C. H. Ketchum (1990) Evaluation of on-site THC Screening Products. Clin. Chem. 36, 1027.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zettl, J. R., T. L. Curry, and D. M. Durfee. (1990) Comparative Study of the Roche Abuscreen ONTRAK System, in Society of Forensic Toxicologists Annual Meeting Program.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crouch, D. J., et al. (1998) A comparison of ONTRAK TESTCUP, Abuscreen ONTRAK, Abuscreen ONLINE, and GC/MS urinalysis test results. J. Foren. Sci. 43, 35–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Towt, J., et al. (1995) ONTRAK TESTCUP: a novel, on-site, multi-analyte screen for the detection of abused drugs. J. Anal. Toxicol. 19, 504–510.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Salamone, S. J., et al. (1997) Flunitrazepam excretion patterns using the Abuscreen OnTrak and OnLine immunoassays: comparison with Gc-Ms. J. Anal. Toxicol. 21, 341–345.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsai, S. C., et al. (1998) Determination of five abused drugs in nitrite-adulterated urine by immunoassays and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Toxicol. 22, 474–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cone, E. J., W. D. Darwin, and S. L. Dickerson (1991) Evaluation of the Abuscreen ONTRAK assay for cocaine (metabolite). Clin. Chem. News 17, 40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz, R. H., S. Bogema, and M. M. Thorne (1990) Evaluation of a rapid latex-particle agglutination-inhibition screening assay for cocaine in urine. J. Pediatr. 117, 670–672.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farrell, L.J. (2002). Abuscreen ONTRAK Tests for Drugs of Abuse. In: Jenkins, A.J., Goldberger, B.A. (eds) On-Site Drug Testing. Forensic Science and Medicine. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-272-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-272-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-231-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-272-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics