Breast Cancer pp 255-262 | Cite as

Nipple Discharge

  • Marcia Boraas
Part of the Current Clinical Oncology book series (CCO)


Despite inclusion in the American Cancer Society’s list of symptoms indicating possible malignancy, most women who present for evaluation of a nipple discharge will be found to have benign breast conditions or a cause extrinsic to the breast. Although approximately 5% of women presenting for breast evaluation will have a nipple discharge as their primary symptom, in most healthy women variable amounts of fluid can be obtained from the nipple with manual or mechanical stimulation. Of those presenting for evaluation of a nipple discharge, approximately 10–15% will be found to have an underlying breast malignancy. Patient age, characteristics of the discharge, and associated clinical and radiographic findings can be used to distinguish those who require specific evaluation to exclude carcinoma. To aid in this distinction, nipple discharge has been classified in the literature as secretion, which must be expressed, versus discharge, which is spontaneous (also termed provoked versus spontaneous). A classification of galactorrhea (milky) versus physiologic versus pathologic discharge has also been used. In the final analysis, the point of any classification is to identify patients whose symptoms indicate intrinsic breast pathology that requires a histologic diagnosis.


Breast Cancer Risk Nipple Discharge Ductal Lavage Intraductal Papilloma Special Clinical Situation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bauer RL, Eckhert KH Jr, Nemoto T (1998) Ductal carcinoma in situ-associated nipple discharge: a clinical marker for locally extensive disease. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 5, 452–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolivar AV, Alvaro RML, Garcia EO (1997) Intraductal placement of a Kopans spring-hookwire guide to localize nonpalpable breast lesions detected by galactography. Acta Radiol. 38, 240–242.Google Scholar
  3. Carter D (1977) Intraductal papillary tumors of the breast—a study of 78 cases. Cancer 39, 1689–1692.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carty NJ, Mudan SS, Ravichandran D, Royle GT, Taglor I (1994) Prospective study of outcome in women presenting with nipple discharge. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 76, 387–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaudary MA, Millis RR, Davies GC, Hayward JL (1982) Nipple discharge: the diagnostic value of testing for occult blood. Ann. Surg. 196, 651–655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung SY, Lee KW, Park KS, Lee Y, Bae SH (1995) Breast tumors associated with nipple discharge: correlation of findings on galactography and sonography. Clin. Imaging 9, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciatto S, Bravetti P, Cariaggi P (1986) Significance of nipple discharge clinical patterns in the selection of cases for cytologic examination. Acta Cytol. 30, 17–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawes LG, Bowen C, Venta LA, Morrow M (1998) Ductography for nipple discharge: no replacement for ductal excision. Surgery 124, 685–691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foretova L, Garber JE, Sadowsky NL, et al. (1998) Carcinoembryonic antigen in breast nipple aspirate fluid. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prey. 7, 195–198.Google Scholar
  10. Gülay H, Bora S, Kilicturgay S, Hamaloglu E, Goksel HA (1994) Management of nipple discharge. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 178, 471–474.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Haagensen CD (1986) Diseases of the Breast. WB Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  12. Hittmair AP, Lininger RA, Tavassoli FA (1998) Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the male breast. Cancer 83, 2139–2149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hou M, Huang CJ, Huang YS, et al. (1998) Evaluation of galactography for nipple discharge. Clin. Imaging 22, 89–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hou MF, Huang TJ, Huang YS, Hsieh JS (1995) A simple method of duct cannulation and localization for galactography before excision in patients with nipple discharge. Radiology 195, 568–569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hughes LE, Mansel RE, Webster DJT (eds.) (1989) Benign Disorders and Disease of the Breast: Concepts and Clinical Management. Baillière Tindall, London.Google Scholar
  16. Ito Y, Tamaki Y, Nakano Y, et al. (1997) Nonpalpable breast cancer with nipple discharge: how should it be treated? Anticancer Res. 17, 791–894.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jardines L (1996) Management of nipple discharge. Am. Surg. 62, 119–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kawamoto M (1994) Breast cancer diagnosis by lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in nipple discharge. Cancer 73, 1836–1841.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keller-Wood M, Bland KI (1991) Breast physiology in normal, lactating and diseased states. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM (eds.) The Breast. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 36–45.Google Scholar
  20. King EB and Goodson, WH III (1991) Discharges and secretions of the nipple. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM (eds.) The Breast. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 46–67.Google Scholar
  21. Kleinberg DL, Gordon LN, Frantz AG (1977) Galactorrhea: a study of 235 cases, including 48 with pituitary tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 296, 589–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kline TS Lash S (1962) Nipple secretion in pregnancy—a cytologic and histologic study. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 37, 626–632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Koretz M, Strano S (1998) Bloody nipple discharge after lumpectomy (letter). Am. J. Radiol. 170, 1400.Google Scholar
  24. Lafreniere R (1990) Bloody nipple discharge during pregnancy: a rationale for conservative treatment. J. Surg. Oncol. 43, 228–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Makita M, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, et al. (1991) Duct endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy in the evaluation of nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 18, 179–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohuchi N, Abe R, Kasai M (1984) Possible cancerous change of intraductal papillomas of the breast. Cancer 54, 605–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohuchi N, Furuta A, Mori S (1994) Management of ductal carcinoma in situ with nipple discharge. Cancer 74, 1294–1302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Petrakis NL (1986) Physiologic, biochemical, and cytologic aspects of nipple aspirate fluid. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 8, 7–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petrakis NL (1993) Nipple aspirate fluid in epidemiologic studies of breast disease. Epidemiol. Rev. 15, 188–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rongione AJ, Evans BD, Kling KM, McFadden DW (1996) Ductography is a useful technique in evaluation of abnormal nipple discharge. Am. Surg. 62, 785–788.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sardanelli F, Imperiale A, Zandrino F, et al. (1997) Breast intraductal masses: ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration after galactography. Radiology 204, 143–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sauter ER, Daly M, Linahan K, et al. (1996) Prostate-specific antigen levels in nipple aspirate fluid correlate with breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prey. 5, 967–970.Google Scholar
  33. Sauter ER, Ross E, Daly M, et al. (1997) Nipple aspirate fluid: a promising non-invasive method to identify cellular markers of breast cancer risk. Br. J. Cancer 76, 494–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seltzer MH, Perloff LJ, Kelley RI, Fitts WT Jr (1970) The significance of age in patients with nipple discharge. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 131, 519–522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Zee KJ, Ortega Perez G, Minnard E, Cohen MA (1998) Preoperative galactography increases the diagnostic yield of major duct excision for nipple discharge. Cancer 82, 1974–1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Iwase T, Takahashi K, Tada T, Uchida Y (1997) Magnetic resonance galactography for a patient with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 42, 87–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcia Boraas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations