Advertisement

New Directions in Proteomics

  • Daniel C. Liebler
Chapter

Abstract

When we ask ourselves what we care about most in analytical proteomics work, two things spring to mind: sensitivity and throughput. Sensitivity is important because proteomics demands analysis of proteins at their natural abundance. In many cases, this forces us to analyze proteins that are present at very low levels. Throughput is important because, to really analyze proteomes (as opposed to proteins), we must be able to perform many analyses as rapidly as possible. Not surprisingly, proteomics technology is evolving toward both improved sensitivity and improved throughput.

Keywords

Proteome Analysis Mass Analyzer Recognition Element Nanospray Source Nucleic Acid Aptamers 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested Reading

  1. Baldwin, M. A., Medzihradsky, K. F., Lock, C. M., Fisher, B., Settineri, T. A., and Burlingame, A. L. (2001) Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization coupled with quadrupole/orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass spectrometry for protein discovery, identification and structural analysis. Anal. Chem. 73, 1707–1720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaurand, R, Stoeckli, M., and Caprioli, R. M. (1999) Direct profiling of proteins in biological tissue sections by MALDI mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 71, 5263–5270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conrads, T. R, Alving, K., Veenstra, T. D., Belov, M. E., Anderson, G. A., Anderson, D. J., et al. (2001) Quantitative proteome analysis of bacterial and mammalian proteomes using a combination of cysteine affinity tags and 15N-metabolic labeling. Anal. Chem. 73, 2132–2139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Figeys, D. and Pinto, D. (2000) Lab-on-a-chip: a revolution in biological and medical sciences. Anal. Chem. 72, 330A - 335A.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lopez, M. F. (2000) Better approaches to finding the needle in a haystack: optimizing proteome analysis through automation. Electrophoresis 21, 1082–1093.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. MacBeth, G. and Schreiber, S. (2001) Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science 289, 1760–1763.Google Scholar
  7. Medzihradsky, K. F., Campbell, J. M., Baldwin, M. A., Falick, A. M., Juhasz, R, Vestal, M. L., and Burlingame, A. L. (2000) The characteristics of peptide collision-induced dissociation using a high performance MALDI-TOF/TOF tandem mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 72, 552–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhu, H., Biolgin, M., Bangham, R., Hall, D., Casamayor, A., Bertone, R, Lan, N., Jansen, R., Bidlingmaier, S., Houfek, T., Mitchell, T., Miller, P., Dean, R. A., Gerstein, M. and Snyder, M. (2001) Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 293, 2101–2105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel C. Liebler
    • 1
  1. 1.College of PharmacyThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations