Skip to main content

Penile Implant Complications

Prevention and Management

  • Chapter
Male Sexual Function

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

The availability of effective oral medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) has dramatically increased awareness of this common problem and encouraged many people to seek treatment. As a result, the marketplace has ballooned many fold in the past few years. There are subgroups of patients who do not respond well to oral therapy; these include patients with severe diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, those in whom nonnerve sparing radical prostatectomy has been performed, and patients with severe venous leakage. Many have turned to alternative therapies including penile implants and according to vendors of these devices in the United States, sales are as good as ever. The mechanical reliability of implants is good with repairs rates in the range from 10 to 20% at 5 yr. There have been few changes in the construction and design of these products in the last decade, indicating that physicians and manufacturers are pleased with the current models, however, problems with these devices can occur. These may be related to mechanical breakdown of the synthetic material, to wearing through body cavities containing prosthesis parts, or to the development of infection associated with prosthetic parts. Experience with these complications has expanded and gratifying results can now be achieved with proper management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wahle GR, Mulcahy JJ. Ventral penile approach in urinary component penile prosthesis placement. J Urol 1993; 149: 537, 538.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mulcahy, JJ. A technique to maintain penile prosthesis position to prevent proximal migration. J Urol 1987; 137: 294–296.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jarrow JP. Risk factors for penile prosthesis infection. J Urol 1996; 156: 402–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomalla JV, Thompson ST, Rowland RG, Mulcahy JJ. Infectious complications of penile prosthetic implants. J Urol 1987; 138: 65–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carson CC, Robinson CN. Late hematogenous infection of penile prostheses. J Urol 1988; 139: 50–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nickel JC, Heaton J, Morales A, Costerton JW. Bacterial biofilm in persistent penile prosthesis associated infection. J Urol 1986; 135: 586–588.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulcahy JJ. Long term experience with salvage of infected penile implants. J Urol. 2000; 163: 481, 482.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maatman TJ, Montague DK. Intracorporal drainage after removal of infected penile prosthesis. Urology 1984; 23: 184–185m.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kowalczyk JJ, Mulcahy JJ. Penile curvature and aneurysmal defects with the ultrex penile prosthesis corrected with insertion of the AMS 700 CX. J Urol 1996; 156: 398–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson SK, Delk JR. A new treatment for peyronie’s disease: Modeling of the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1994; 152: 1121–1123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hakim LS, Kulaksizogu H, Hamill BK, Udelson D, Goldstein I. Guide to safe corporotomy incisions in the presence of underlying inflatable penile cylinders: results of vitro and in vivo studies. J Urol 1996; 155: 918–923.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mulcahy JJ, Rowland RG. Tunica wedge excision to correct penile curvature associated with the inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1987; 138: 63, 64.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mooreville M, Adrian S, Delk JR, Wilson SK. Implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis in patients with severe corporeal fibrosis: Introduction of a new penile cavernotome. J Urol 1999; 162: 2054–2057.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fishman IJ. Corporeal reconstruction procedures for complicated penile implants. Urol Clin. N Am 1989; 16: 73–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mulcahy JJ. Distal corporoplasty for lateral extrusion of penile prosthesis cylinders. J Urol 1999; 161: 193–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ball TP. Surgical repair of penile SST deformity. Urology 1980; 15: 603, 604.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McClellan DS, Masih BK. Gangrene of the penis as a complication of penile prosthesis. J Urol 1985; 133: 862, 863

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fallon B, Ghanem H. Sexual performance and satisfaction with penile prostheses in impotence of various etiologies. Int J Impot Res 1990; 2: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mulcahy, J.J. (2001). Penile Implant Complications. In: Mulcahy, J.J. (eds) Male Sexual Function. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-098-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-098-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5701-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-098-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics