Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics pp 207-244 | Cite as

# Basic Pricing Theory

- 1.3k Downloads

## Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to multi-product monopoly pricing when the variable costs are linear. Profit maximization problems with linear variable costs arise from capacity constraints, where the firm maximizes the expected profit net of the opportunity costs of the capacities used. We argue that under mild assumptions, both the optimal profit function and the expected consumer surplus are convex functions of the variable costs. Consequently, when variable costs are random, both the firm and the representative consumer benefit from prices that dynamically respond to changes in variable costs. Randomness in variable cost is often driven by randomness in demand in conjunction with capacity constraints, and this accounts for some of the benefits of dynamic pricing. We explore conditions for the existence and uniqueness of maximizers of the expected profit and analyze in detail problems with capacity constraints both when prices are set for the entire sales horizon a priori, and when prices are allowed to change during the sales horizon. The firm’s problem is discussed in Sect. 8.2, while the representative consumer’s problem is presented in Sect. 8.3. The case with finite capacity is discussed in Sect. 8.4. Details about existence and uniqueness for single product problems are discussed in Sect. 8.5. This section also includes applications to priority pricing, social planning, multiple market segments, and peak-load pricing. Multi-product pricing problems are discussed in Sect. 8.6.

## References

- T. Amornpetchkul, H.-S. Ahn, O. Sahin, Conditional promotions and consumer overspending. Prod. Oper. Manag.
**27**(8), 1455–1475 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - S.P. Anderson, A. de Palma, J.G. Thisse,
*Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation*(MIT Press, Cambridge, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - A. Belkaid, V. Martinez-de-Albeniz, Here comes the sun: fashion goods retailing under weather shocks. Technical report, University of Navarra, Barcelona, Spain (2017)Google Scholar
- O. Besbes, R. Phillips, A. Zeevi, Testing the validity of a demand model: an operations perspective. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.
**12**(1), 162–183 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - T. Boyaci, Y. Akcay, Pricing when customers have limited attention. Manag. Sci.
**64**(7), 2995–3014 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - G. Cachon, P. Feldman, Pricing services subject to congestion: charge per-use fees or sell subscriptions. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.
**13**(2), 244–260 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - G. Cachon, K.M. Daniels, R. Lobel, The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.
**19**(3), 368–384 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - R. Caldentey, L.M. Wein, Revenue management of a make-to-stock queue. Oper. Res.
**54**(5), 859–875 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - A. Caplin, B. Nalebuff, Aggregation and imperfect competition: on the existence of equilibrium. Econometrica
**59**(1), 25–59 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - J. Carrasco, J. de Ortuzar, Review and assessment of the nested logit model. Transp. Rev.
**22**(2), 197–218 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - N. Chen, G. Gallego, Welfare analysis of dynamic pricing. Manag. Sci.
**65**(1), 139–151 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - H. Chen, M. Hu, G. Perakis, Distribution-free pricing. Technical report, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (2017a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- M. Cohen, R.S. Pindyck, G. Perakis, Pricing with limited knowledge of demand. Technical report, MIT, Cambridge, MA (2017b)Google Scholar
- P. Courty, J. Nasiry, Loss aversion and the uniform pricing puzzle for media and entertainment products. Econ. Theory
**66**(1), 105–140 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Y. Cui, I. Duenyas, O. Sahin, Unbundling of ancillary service: how does price discrimination of main service matter? Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.
**20**(3), 455–466 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - C. Du, W.L. Cooper, Z. Wang, Optimal pricing for a multinomial logit choice model with network effects. Oper. Res.
**64**(2), 2016 (2016)Google Scholar - C. Du, W.L. Cooper, Z. Wang, Optimal worst-case pricing for a logit demand model with network effects. Oper. Res. Lett.
**46**(3), 2018 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - A.N. Elmachtoub, M.L. Hamilton, The power of opaque products in pricing. Technical report, Columbia University, New York, NY (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- A.N. Elmachtoub, Y. Wei, Retailing with opaque products. Technical report, Columbia University, New York, NY (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- A.N. Elmachtoub, V. Gupta, M.L. Hamilton, The value of personlized pricing. Technical report, Columbia University, New York, NY (2018)Google Scholar
- S.S. Eren, C. Maglaras, Monopoly pricing with limited demand information. J. Revenue Pricing Manag.
**9**(1–2), 23–48 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - G. Gallego, O. Sahin, Revenue management with partially refundable fares. Oper. Res.
**58**(4), 817–833 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - G. Gallego, R. Wang, Multiproduct price optimization and competition under the nested logit model with product-differentiated price sensitivities. Oper. Res.
**62**(2), 450–461 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - T.-H. Ho, C.S. Tang, D.R. Bell, Rational shopping behavior and the option value of variable pricing. Manag. Sci.
**44**(12–2), S145–S160 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Z. Hu, J. Nasiry, Are markets with loss-averse consumers more sensitive to losses? Manag. Sci.
**64**(3), 1384–1395 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - M. Hu, M. Pavlin, M. Shi, When gray markets have silver linings: all-unit discounts, gray markets, and channel management. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.
**15**(2), 250–262 (2013a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - C.R. Johnson, Positive definite matrices. Am. Math. Mon.
**77**(3), 259–264 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - P.W. Keller, R. Levi, G. Perakis, Efficient formulations for pricing under attraction demand models. Math. Program.
**14**(1–2), 223–261 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - V. Kostami, D. Kostamis, S. Ziya, Pricing and capacity allocation for shared services. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.
**19**(2), 230–245 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - M.A. Larriviere, E.L. Porteus, Selling to the newsvendor: an analysis of price-only contracts. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.
**3**(4), 293–305 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - H. Li, W.T. Huh, Pricing multiple products with the multinomial logit and nested logit models: concavity and implications. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.
**13**(4), 546–563 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Y. Lu, D. Simchi-Levi, On the unimodality of the profit function of the pricing newsvendor. Prod. Oper. Manag.
**22**(3), 615–625 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - W. Ma, D. Simchi-Levi, Learning valuation distributions from bundle sales. Technical report, MIT, Cambridge, MA (2018)Google Scholar
- C. Maglaras, A. Zeevi, Pricing and design of differentiated services: approximate analysis and structural insights. Oper. Res.
**53**(2), 242–262 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - P.R. McAfee, Coarse matching. Econometrica
**75**(5), 2025–2034 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - D. McFadden, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, in
*Frontiers in Econometrics*, ed. by P. Zarembka (Academic, New York, 1974), pp. 105–142Google Scholar - N.C. Petruzzi, M. Dada, Pricing and the newsvendor problem: a review with extensions. Oper. Res.
**47**(2), 183–194 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - R. Phillips, Optimizing prices for consumer credit. J. Revenue Pricing Manag.
**12**(4), 360–377 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - I.P.L. Png, Reservations: customer insurance in the marketing of capacity. Mark. Sci.
**8**(3), 248–264 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - W.Z. Rayfield, P. Rusmevichientong, H. Topaloglu, Approximation methods for pricing problems under the nested logit model with price bounds. INFORMS J. Comput.
**27**(2), 335–357 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - P. Rusmevichientong, B. Van Roy, P.W. Glynn, A nonparametric approach to multiproduct pricing. Oper. Res.
**54**(1), 82–98 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - S. Shugan, J. Xie, Advance pricing of services and other implications of separating purchase and consumption. J. Serv. Res.
**2**(3), 227–239 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - C.S. Tang, R. Yin, Joint ordering and pricing strategies for managing substitutable products. Prod. Oper. Manag.
**16**(1), 138–153 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - C.S. Tang, K. Rajaram, A. Alptekinoglu, J. Ou, The benefits of advance booking discount programs: model and analysis. Manag. Sci.
**50**(4), 465–478 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - G.J. van den Berg, On the uniqueness of optimal prices set by monopolistic sellers. J. Econ.
**141**(2), 482–491 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - X. Vives,
*Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools*(MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001)Google Scholar - R. Wang, When prospect theory meets consumer choice models: assortment and pricing management with reference prices. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.
**20**(3), 583–600 (2018b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - R. Wang, Z. Wang, Consumer choice models with endogenous network effects. Manag. Sci.
**63**(11), 3944–3960 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - R. Wang, M. Dada, O. Sahin, Pricing ancillary service subscriptions. Manag. Sci. (2019, forthcoming)Google Scholar
- J. Xie, S. Shugan, Electronic tickets, smart cards, and online prepayments: when and how to advance sell. Mark. Sci.
**20**, 219–243 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Z. Yan, C. Cheng, K. Natarajan, C.-P. Teo, Marginal estimation price optimization: data driven multi-product pricing problem. Technical report, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore (2017)Google Scholar
- H. Zhang, P. Rusmevichientong, H. Topaloglu, Technical note – multiproduct pricing under the generalized extreme value models with homogeneous price sensitivity parameters. Oper. Res.
**66**(6), 1559–1570 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - S. Ziya, H. Ayhan, R.D. Folley, Relationships among three assumptions in revenue management. Oper. Res.
**52**(5), 804–809 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar