Skip to main content

Single Resource Revenue Management with Dependent Demands

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 279))

  • 3816 Accesses

Abstract

Revenue managers struggled for decades with the problem of finding optimal control mechanisms for fare class structures with dependent demands. In this context, a resource, such as seats on a plane, can be offered at different fares with potentially different restrictions and ancillary services, and the demand for those fares is interdependent. The question is what subset of the fares (or assortment of products) to offer for sale at any given time. Practitioners often use the term open, or open for sale, for a fare that is part of the offered assortment, and the term closed for fares that are not part of the offered assortment. For many years, practitioners preferred to model time implicitly by seeking extensions of Littlewood’s rule and EMSR type heuristics to the case of dependent demands. Finding the right way to extend Littlewood’s rule proved to be more difficult than anticipated. An alternative approach, favored by academics and gaining traction in industry, is to model time explicitly. In this chapter, we will explore both formulations but most of our attention is devoted to the more tractable model where time is treated explicitly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Strictly speaking we should say an index, but the index is unique except at boundary points.

References

  • P.P. Belobaba, L.R. Weatherford, Comparing decision rules that incorporate customer diversion in perishable asset revenue management situations. Decis. Sci. 27 (2), 343–363 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Brumelle, J.I. McGill, T.H. Oum, M.W. Tretheway, K. Sawaki, Allocation of airline seats between stochastically dependent demands. Transp. Sci. 24 (3), 183–192 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.L. Cooper, L. Li, On the use of buy up as a model of customer choice in revenue management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21 (5), 833–850 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Cooper, T. Homem de Mello, A. Kleywegt, Models of the spiral-down effect in revenue management. Oper. Res. 54 (5), 968–987 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Fiig, K. Isler, C. Hopperstad, P. Belobaba, Optimization of mixed fare structures: theory and applications. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 9 (1–2), 152–170 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Gallego, L. Lin, R. Ratliff, Choice based EMSR methods for single-resource revenue management with demand dependencies. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 8 (2–3), 207–240 (2009a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Gallego, L. Lin, R. Ratliff, Demand arrival order and revenue management controls, in AGIFORS Cargo and RM Study Group (2009b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Ge, C. Pan, Study on overbooking management with a choice model of consumer behavior, in 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science (2010), pp. 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • W.K. Kincaid, D.A. Darling, An inventory pricing problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 7 (2), 183–208 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.T. Lee, M. Hersh, A model for dynamic airline seat inventory control with multiple seat bookings. Transp. Sci. 27 (3), 252–265 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.D. Sierag, G.M. Koole, R.D. van der Mei, J.I. van der Rest, B. Zwart, Revenue management under customer choice behaviour with cancellations and overbooking. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 246 (1), 170–185 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Talluri, G. van Ryzin, Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Manag. Sci. 50 (1), 15–33 (2004a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Walczak, S. Mardan, R. Kallesen, Customer choice, fare adjustments and the marginal expected revenue data transformation: a note on using old yield management techniques in the brave new world of pricing. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 9, 94–109 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Proof of Proposition 6.2

We can linearize (6.5) by introducing a new variable, say y, such that y ≥ R j −  j for all j ∈ K and z ≥ 0, which results in the linear program:

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} \bar{V}(T,c) &\displaystyle = &\displaystyle \min_{z \geq 0}[\varLambda y+ cz],\\ \mbox{subject to} &\displaystyle &\displaystyle \varLambda y + \varLambda \varPi_j z \geq \varLambda R_j~~j \in K\\ &\displaystyle &\displaystyle z \geq 0, \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

where for convenience we have multiplied the constraints y + Π j z ≥ R j, j ∈ K by Λ > 0. The dual of this problem is given by

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} \bar{V}(T,c) &\displaystyle = &\displaystyle \varLambda \max \sum_{j \in K} R_jt_j\\ {} \mbox{subject to} &\displaystyle &\displaystyle \varLambda \sum_{j \in K} \varPi_j t_j \leq c \\ {} &\displaystyle &\displaystyle \sum_{j \in K}t_j =1 \\ {} &\displaystyle &\displaystyle t_j \geq 0~~~\forall j \in K. \end{array} \end{aligned} $$

This linear program decides the proportion of time, t j ∈ [0, 1], that each efficient set E j is offered to maximize the revenue subject to the capacity constraint. Dividing the constraint by Λ and defining ρ = cΛ we see that \(\bar {V}(T,c)/\varLambda = Q(\rho )\), or equivalently \(\bar {V}(T,c) = \varLambda Q(c/\varLambda )\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gallego, G., Topaloglu, H. (2019). Single Resource Revenue Management with Dependent Demands. In: Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 279. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9606-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics