Single Resource Revenue Management with Dependent Demands

  • Guillermo Gallego
  • Huseyin Topaloglu
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 279)


Revenue managers struggled for decades with the problem of finding optimal control mechanisms for fare class structures with dependent demands. In this context, a resource, such as seats on a plane, can be offered at different fares with potentially different restrictions and ancillary services, and the demand for those fares is interdependent. The question is what subset of the fares (or assortment of products) to offer for sale at any given time. Practitioners often use the term open, or open for sale, for a fare that is part of the offered assortment, and the term closed for fares that are not part of the offered assortment. For many years, practitioners preferred to model time implicitly by seeking extensions of Littlewood’s rule and EMSR type heuristics to the case of dependent demands. Finding the right way to extend Littlewood’s rule proved to be more difficult than anticipated. An alternative approach, favored by academics and gaining traction in industry, is to model time explicitly. In this chapter, we will explore both formulations but most of our attention is devoted to the more tractable model where time is treated explicitly.


  1. P.P. Belobaba, L.R. Weatherford, Comparing decision rules that incorporate customer diversion in perishable asset revenue management situations. Decis. Sci. 27 (2), 343–363 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. S.L. Brumelle, J.I. McGill, T.H. Oum, M.W. Tretheway, K. Sawaki, Allocation of airline seats between stochastically dependent demands. Transp. Sci. 24 (3), 183–192 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. W.L. Cooper, L. Li, On the use of buy up as a model of customer choice in revenue management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21 (5), 833–850 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. W. Cooper, T. Homem de Mello, A. Kleywegt, Models of the spiral-down effect in revenue management. Oper. Res. 54 (5), 968–987 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Fiig, K. Isler, C. Hopperstad, P. Belobaba, Optimization of mixed fare structures: theory and applications. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 9 (1–2), 152–170 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. G. Gallego, L. Lin, R. Ratliff, Choice based EMSR methods for single-resource revenue management with demand dependencies. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 8 (2–3), 207–240 (2009a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Gallego, L. Lin, R. Ratliff, Demand arrival order and revenue management controls, in AGIFORS Cargo and RM Study Group (2009b)Google Scholar
  8. Y. Ge, C. Pan, Study on overbooking management with a choice model of consumer behavior, in 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science (2010), pp. 1–4Google Scholar
  9. W.K. Kincaid, D.A. Darling, An inventory pricing problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 7 (2), 183–208 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. C.T. Lee, M. Hersh, A model for dynamic airline seat inventory control with multiple seat bookings. Transp. Sci. 27 (3), 252–265 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D.D. Sierag, G.M. Koole, R.D. van der Mei, J.I. van der Rest, B. Zwart, Revenue management under customer choice behaviour with cancellations and overbooking. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 246 (1), 170–185 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Talluri, G. van Ryzin, Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Manag. Sci. 50 (1), 15–33 (2004a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Walczak, S. Mardan, R. Kallesen, Customer choice, fare adjustments and the marginal expected revenue data transformation: a note on using old yield management techniques in the brave new world of pricing. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 9, 94–109 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillermo Gallego
    • 1
  • Huseyin Topaloglu
    • 2
  1. 1.Clearwater BayHong Kong
  2. 2.ORIECornell UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations