Abstract
Revenue managers struggled for decades with the problem of finding optimal control mechanisms for fare class structures with dependent demands. In this context, a resource, such as seats on a plane, can be offered at different fares with potentially different restrictions and ancillary services, and the demand for those fares is interdependent. The question is what subset of the fares (or assortment of products) to offer for sale at any given time. Practitioners often use the term open, or open for sale, for a fare that is part of the offered assortment, and the term closed for fares that are not part of the offered assortment. For many years, practitioners preferred to model time implicitly by seeking extensions of Littlewood’s rule and EMSR type heuristics to the case of dependent demands. Finding the right way to extend Littlewood’s rule proved to be more difficult than anticipated. An alternative approach, favored by academics and gaining traction in industry, is to model time explicitly. In this chapter, we will explore both formulations but most of our attention is devoted to the more tractable model where time is treated explicitly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Strictly speaking we should say an index, but the index is unique except at boundary points.
References
P.P. Belobaba, L.R. Weatherford, Comparing decision rules that incorporate customer diversion in perishable asset revenue management situations. Decis. Sci. 27 (2), 343–363 (1996)
S.L. Brumelle, J.I. McGill, T.H. Oum, M.W. Tretheway, K. Sawaki, Allocation of airline seats between stochastically dependent demands. Transp. Sci. 24 (3), 183–192 (1990)
W.L. Cooper, L. Li, On the use of buy up as a model of customer choice in revenue management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 21 (5), 833–850 (2012)
W. Cooper, T. Homem de Mello, A. Kleywegt, Models of the spiral-down effect in revenue management. Oper. Res. 54 (5), 968–987 (2006)
T. Fiig, K. Isler, C. Hopperstad, P. Belobaba, Optimization of mixed fare structures: theory and applications. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 9 (1–2), 152–170 (2010)
G. Gallego, L. Lin, R. Ratliff, Choice based EMSR methods for single-resource revenue management with demand dependencies. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 8 (2–3), 207–240 (2009a)
G. Gallego, L. Lin, R. Ratliff, Demand arrival order and revenue management controls, in AGIFORS Cargo and RM Study Group (2009b)
Y. Ge, C. Pan, Study on overbooking management with a choice model of consumer behavior, in 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science (2010), pp. 1–4
W.K. Kincaid, D.A. Darling, An inventory pricing problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 7 (2), 183–208 (1963)
C.T. Lee, M. Hersh, A model for dynamic airline seat inventory control with multiple seat bookings. Transp. Sci. 27 (3), 252–265 (1993)
D.D. Sierag, G.M. Koole, R.D. van der Mei, J.I. van der Rest, B. Zwart, Revenue management under customer choice behaviour with cancellations and overbooking. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 246 (1), 170–185 (2015)
K. Talluri, G. van Ryzin, Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Manag. Sci. 50 (1), 15–33 (2004a)
D. Walczak, S. Mardan, R. Kallesen, Customer choice, fare adjustments and the marginal expected revenue data transformation: a note on using old yield management techniques in the brave new world of pricing. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. 9, 94–109 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Proposition 6.2
We can linearize (6.5) by introducing a new variable, say y, such that y ≥ R j − zΠ j for all j ∈ K and z ≥ 0, which results in the linear program:
where for convenience we have multiplied the constraints y + Π j z ≥ R j, j ∈ K by Λ > 0. The dual of this problem is given by
This linear program decides the proportion of time, t j ∈ [0, 1], that each efficient set E j is offered to maximize the revenue subject to the capacity constraint. Dividing the constraint by Λ and defining ρ = c∕Λ we see that \(\bar {V}(T,c)/\varLambda = Q(\rho )\), or equivalently \(\bar {V}(T,c) = \varLambda Q(c/\varLambda )\).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gallego, G., Topaloglu, H. (2019). Single Resource Revenue Management with Dependent Demands. In: Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 279. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9606-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9606-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9604-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9606-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)