Advertisement

Characteristics of Temporary and Permanent Threshold Shifts in Vertebrates

  • James C. Saunders
  • Robert J. DoolingEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Handbook of Auditory Research book series (SHAR, volume 66)

Abstract

Studies of noise-induced threshold shift to acoustic over exposure, conducted in the laboratory, employ a simple and rigorous paradigm. First, hearing is measured usually as a series of thresholds for pure tones distributed throughout the range of hearing. Then the subject is exposed to a loud sound, after which estimates of threshold are repeated. A difference between the pre- and postthreshold values represents the consequences of the sound exposure. From this approach, much is known about the effects of intense sound exposure on hearing. This chapter reviews the data on temporary and permanent threshold shifts. Examples of noise-induced threshold shift (NITS) are drawn from the extensive animal literature obtained from a mammal (chinchilla) and several avian (budgerigar and chicken chick) species. The conclusions from these examples is that when the parameters of exposure are well characterized and thresholds carefully determined, a set of reliable and valid observations on the magnitude and duration of NITS emerge. Most importantly, certain aspects of hearing loss appear to be consistent across species. Given that a set of repeatable patterns of NITS are known, it is suggested that meaningful predictions can be made on the susceptibility of hearing loss in wild animals exposed to noise in natural environments. This suggestion assumes that the parameters of the exposure such as the sound pressure level and duration are reasonably well-known. The validity of these estimates has limitations and these are also considered.

Keywords

Adaptation Asymptotic threshold shift Continuous exposure Decibel Fatigue Hearing loss Impulse/impact exposure Intermittent exposure Noise-induced threshold shift Permanent threshold shift recovery Sound field Sound pressure level Temporary threshold shift Threshold shift 

References

  1. Akay, A. (1978). A review of impact noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 977–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borg, E., Canlon, B., & Engström, B. (1995). Noise-induced hearing loss, literature review and experiments in rabbits. Morphology and electrophysiological features, exposure parameters, and temporal factors and interactions. Scandinavian Audiology Supplementum, 40, 1–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Busnel, R.-G. (1978). Introduction. In J. L. Fletcher & R.-G. Busnel (Eds.), The Effects of Noise on Wildlife (pp. 7–22). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carder, H. M., & Miller, J. D. (1972). Temporary threshold shifts from prolonged exposure to noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 15, 603–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, G.-D. C., Decker, B., Prakash, V., Muthaiah, K., Sheppard, A., & Salvi, R. (2014). Prolonged noise exposure-induced auditory threshold shifts in rats. Hearing Research, 317, 1–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, W. W. (1991). Recent studies of temporary threshold shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS) in animals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 155–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Conlee, J. W., Abdul-Baqi, K. J., McCandless, G. A., & Creel, D. J. (1986). Differential susceptibility to noise-induced permanent threshold shift between albino and pigmented guinea pigs. Hearing Research, 23, 81–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, R. R. (2006). Acoustic measurement: A tutorial for molecular biologists. Brain Research, 1091, 32–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, R. R. Newlander, J. K., Ling, X. B., Cortopassi, G. A., Kreig, E. F., & Erway, L. C. (2001). Genetic basis for susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in mice. Hearing Research, 155, 82–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dooling, R. J, & Saunders, J. C. (1975). Hearing in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus): Absolute thresholds, critical ratios, frequency difference limens and vocalizations. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88, 1–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dooling, R. J., West, E. W., & Leek, M. R. (2009). Conceptual and computational models of the effects of anthropogenic noise on birds. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Bioacoustics 2009, Holywell Park, UK, March 31 to April 2, 2009. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 31, 99–106.Google Scholar
  12. Duan, M., Laurell, G., Qiu, J., & Borg, E. (2008). Susceptibility to impulse noise trauma in different species: Guinea pig, rat, mouse. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 128, 277–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Finneran, J. J. (2015). Noise-induced hearing loss in marine mammals: A review of temporary threshold shift studies from 1996–2015. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138, 1702–1726.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleisher, G. (1978). Evolutionary principles of the mammalian middle ear. Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology, 55, 1–70.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, R. G., & ter Haar, G. (2016). Noise-induced hearing loss. In R. G. Harvey & G. ter Haar (Eds.), Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases of the Dog and Cat (pp. 214–215). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heffner, H. E., & Koay, G. (2005). Tinnitus and hearing loss in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) exposed to loud sound. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 734–742.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Henderson, D., & Hamernik, R. P. (1986). Impulse noise: Critical review. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 569–584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Henderson, D., Subramaniam, M., & Gratton, M. A. (1991). Impact noise: The importance of level, duration, and repetition rate. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 1350–1357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Henderson, D., Subramaniam, M., & Boettcher, F. A. (1993). Individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss: An old topic revisited. Ear and Hearing, 14, 152–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hood, J. D. (1956). Fatigue and adaptation of hearing. British Medical Bulletin, 12, 125–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Köppl, C. (2011). Birds - same thing but different? Convergent evolution in the avian and mammalian auditory systems provides informative comparative models. Hearing Research, 273, 65–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2009). Adding injury to insult: Cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 14,077–14,085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mason, M. J. (2013). Of mice, moles and guinea pigs: Functional morphology of the middle ear in living mammals. Hearing Research, 301, 4–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. McFadden, E. A., & Saunders, J. C. (1989). Recovery of auditory function following intense sound exposure in the neonatal chick. Hearing Research, 41, 205–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Melnick, W. (1990). Human temporary threshold shift (TTS) and damage risk. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, J. D., Watson, C. S., & Covell, W. P. (1963). Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta Oto-Laryngology, Supplement, 176, 1–91.Google Scholar
  27. Mills, J. H. (1973). Temporary and permanent threshold shifts produced by nine-day exposures to noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 16, 426–438.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mills, J. H. (1976). Threshold shifts produced by a 90-day exposure to noise. In D. Henderson, R. Hammernick, D. S. Dosanjh, & J. H. Mills (Eds.), Effects of Noise on Hearing (pp. 265–275). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mills, J. H., & Talo, S. A. (1972). Temporary threshold shift produced by exposures to high frequency noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 624–631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Moody, D. B., Sebbins, W. C., Johnsson, L. G., & Hawkins, J. E., Jr. (1976). Noise-induced hearing loss in the monkey. In D. Henderson, R. P. Hammernick, D. S. Dosanjh, & J. H. Mills (Eds.), Effects of Noise on Hearing (pp. 309–325). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ou, H. C., Bohne, B. A., & Harding, G. W. (2000). Noise damage in the C57BL/CBA mouse. Hearing Research, 145, 111–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pugliano, F. A., Wilcox, T. O., Rossiter, J., & Saunders, J. C. (1993). Recovery of auditory structure and function in neonatal chicks exposed to intense sound for 8 days. Neuroscience Letters, 151, 214–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rabinowitz, P. M (2012). The public health significance of noise-induced hearing loss. In C. G. Le Prell, D. Henderson, R. R. Fay, & A. N. Popper (Eds.), Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Scientific Advances (pp. 13–25). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramamoorthy, S, & Nuttall, A. L. (2012). Half-octave shift in mammalian hearing is an epiphenomenon of the cochlear amplifier. PLoS ONE, 7, e45640. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045640.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Roberto, M, Hamernik, R. P, Salvi, R. J, Henderson, D, & Milone, R (1985). Impact noise and the equal energy hypothesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 1514–1520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryals, B. M., Dooling, R. J., Westbrook, E., Dent, M. L., MacKenzie, A., & Larsen, O. N. (1999). Avian species differences in susceptibility to noise exposure. Hearing Research, 131, 71–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryan, A., & Bone, R. C. (1978). Noise-induced threshold shift and cochlear pathology in the Mongolian gerbil. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 1145–1151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Salvi, R., Lobarinas, E., Chen, G. D., Stolzberg, D., & Ding, D. (2011). Animal models of hearing loss and tinnitus. In J. Hau & S. Y. Schapiro (Eds.), Animal Models. Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, vol. II 3rd ed. (pp. 419–453). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  39. Salvi, R. J., Henderson, D., Hamernik, R. P., & Coletti, V. (1986). Basic and Applied Aspects of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saunders, J. C. (1985). Auditory structure and function in the bird middle ear: An evaluation by SEM and capacitive probe. Hearing Research, 18, 253–268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Saunders, J. C. (2010). The role of hair cell regeneration in an avian model of inner ear injury and repair from acoustic trauma. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal, 51, 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saunders, J. C., & Dooling, R. J. (1974). Noise-induced threshold shift in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 71, 1962–1965.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Saunders, J. C., & Rosowski, J. J. (1979). The assessment of hearing in animals. In W. F. Rintlemann (Ed.), The Assessment of Hearing (pp. 487–529). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  44. Saunders, J. C., & Dear, S. P. (1983). Comparative morphology of stereocilia. In R. R. Fay and G. Gourevitch (Eds.), Essays on Hearing in Honor of E. G. Wever (pp. 175–197). Groton, CT: Amphora Press.Google Scholar
  45. Saunders, J. C., Mills, J. H., & Miller, J. C. (1977). Threshold shift in chinchilla from daily exposure to noise for six hours The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 558–570.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Saunders, J. C., Dear, S. P., & Schneider, M. (1985a). The anatomical consequences of acoustic trauma: a review and tutorial. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78, 833–860.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Saunders, J. C., Schneider, M. E., & Dear, S. P. (1985b). The structure and function of actin in hair cells. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 78, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saunders, J. C., Cohen, Y. E., & Szymko, Y. M. (1991). The structural and functional consequences of acoustic injury in the cochlea and peripheral auditory system: A five year update. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 136–146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Saunders, J. C., Torsiglieri, A. J., & DeDio, R. M. (1993). The growth of hearing loss in neonatal chicks exposed to intense pure tones. Hearing Research, 69, 25–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Spassova, M. A., Avissar, M., Furman, A. C., Crumling, M. A., Saunders, J. C., & Parsons, T. D. (2004). Evidence that rapid vesicle replenishment of the synaptic ribbon mediates recovery from short-term adaptation at the hair cell afferent synapse. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 5, 376–390.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Syka, J., & Popelár, J. (1980). Hearing threshold shifts from prolonged exposure to noise in guinea pigs. Hearing Research, 3, 205–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor, W, Pearson, J, Mair, A, & Burns, W. (1965). Study of noise and hearing in jute weaving. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 113–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tontechnik-Recher-sengplielaudio. (2016). How Does the Sound or Noise Depend on Distance from the Source? Audio Tutorial, Tonmeister Institut. Available at http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-SoundAndDistance.htm. Accessed December 22, 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryThe Perelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations