Skip to main content

Profit Maximizing Storage Integration in AC Power Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Energy Markets and Responsive Grids

Part of the book series: The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications ((IMA,volume 162))

Abstract

This work demonstrates that there is an analytical relationship between nodal price signals and the optimal allocation and operation of distributed energy storage systems (ESSs) in alternating current (AC) power networks. The results are based on a semidefinite relaxation of a multi-period optimal power flow (OPF) with storage problem in which the ESSs provide both real and reactive power to the grid. Strong duality is exploited to define a storage operator subproblem that is used to elucidate the natural duality between minimizing system costs and maximizing the profits of the storage operator in purely competitive markets. We illustrate these theoretical relationships, which require strong duality to hold, and discuss their impact on siting decisions using case studies based on an augmented IEEE benchmark system. We focus on how the provision of reactive power in combination with traditional grid services changes both the ESS allocation strategy and the overall performance of the simulated power network. Our results highlight the tight connections between market design and the financial viability of large-scale storage integration in AC power systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbaspour M et al (2013) Optimal operation scheduling of wind power integrated with compressed air energy storage. Renew Energy 51:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadi H, Foroud AA (2016) Improvement of the simultaneous active and reactive power markets pricing and structure. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(1):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akhil AA, Huff G, Currier AB, Kaun BC, Rastler DM, Chen SB, Cotter AL, Bradshaw DT, Gauntlett WD (2013) DOE/EPRI 2013 electricity storage handbook in collaboration with NRECA. Tech. Rep. SAND2013-5131, Sandia National Laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atwa YM, El-Saadany EF (2013) Optimal allocation of ESS in distribution systems with a high penetration of wind energy. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(4):1815–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bai X, Wei H, Fujisawa K, Wang Y (2008) Semidefinite programming for optimal power flow problems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 30(6–7):383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boldea I (2015) Variable speed generators. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bose S, Gayme DF, Topcu U, Chandy KM (2012) Optimal placement of energy storage in the grid. In: Proceeding of the 51st IEEE conference on decision and control, Maui, HI, pp 5605–5612

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bose S, Gayme D, Chandy K, Low S (2015) Quadratically constrained quadratic programs on acyclic graphs with application to power flow. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 2(3):278–287. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2015.2401172

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bragard M, Soltau N, Thomas S, Doncker RWD (2010) The balance of renewable sources and user demands in grids: power electronics for modular battery energy storage systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron 25(12):3049–3056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Castillo A, Gayme DF (2013) Profit maximizing storage allocation in power grids. In: Proceeding of the 52nd IEEE conference on decision and control, Firenze, pp 429–435

    Google Scholar 

  11. Castillo A, Gayme DF (2014) Grid-scale energy storage applications in renewable energy integration: a survey. Energy Convers Manag 87:885–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castillo A, Gayme DF (2017) Evaluating the effects of real power losses in optimal power flow based storage integration. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2017.2687819

  13. Chandy KM, Low S, Topcu U, Xu H (2010) A simple optimal power flow model with energy storage. In: Proceeding of the 49th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1051–1057

    Google Scholar 

  14. Commission Staff Report: Payment for reactive power. Tech. Rep. AD14-7, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dvijotham K, Backhaus S, Chertkov M (2011) Operations-based planning for placement and sizing of energy storage in a grid with a high penetration of renewables. Tech. rep., Los Alamos National Lab

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis A, Nelson R, Engeln EV, Walling R, MacDowell J, Casey L, Seymour E, Peter W, Barker C, Kirby B, Williams JR: Review of existing reactive power requirements for variable generation. In: IEEE power and energy society general meeting, pp 1–7 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eyer J, Corey G (2010) Energy storage for the electricity grid: benefits and market potential assessment guide. Tech. rep., Sandia National Laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  18. Farahani HF, Shayanfar HA, Ghazizadeh MS (2014) Modeling of stochastic behavior of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle in a reactive power market. Electr Eng 96(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gabash A, Li P (2012) Active-reactive optimal power flow in distribution networks with embedded generation and battery storage. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(4):2026–2035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gayme DF, Topcu U (2013) Optimal power flow with large-scale storage integration. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(2):709–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghofrani M, Arabali A, Etezadi-Amoli M, Fadali MS (2013) A framework for optimal placement of energy storage units within a power system with high wind penetration. IEEE Trans Sustainable Energy 4(2):434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gopalakrishnan A, Raghunathan AU, Nikovski D, Biegler LT (2013) Global optimization of multi-period optimal power flow. In: Proceeding of the American control conference, Washington, DC, pp 1157–1164

    Google Scholar 

  23. Homaee O, Jadid S (2014) Investigation of synchronous generator in reactive power market – an accurate view. IET Gener Transm Distrib 8(11):1881–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu Z, Jewell WT (2011) Optimal power flow analysis of energy storage for congestion relief, emissions reduction, and cost savings. In: 2011 IEEE/PES systems Conference and exposition. Phoenix, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  25. Irving MR, Sterling MJH (1985) Economic dispatch of active power by quadratic programming using a sparse linear complementary algorithm. Electr Power Energy Syst 7:2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jabr RA, Coonick AH, Cory BJ (2002) A primal-dual interior point method for optimal power flow dispatching. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(3):654–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jenkins N, Allan R, Crossley P, Kirschen D, Strbac G (2000) Technical impacts of embedded generation on the distribution system. In: Embedded generation, pp 11–12. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Josz C, Maeght J, Panciatici P, Gilbert JC (2015) Application of the moment-SOS approach to global optimization of the OPF problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 30(1):463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kargarian A, Raoofat M, Mohammadi M (2011) Reactive power market management considering voltage control area reserve and system security. Appl Energy 88(11):3832–3840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lavaei J, Low SH (2012) Zero duality gap in optimal power flow problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(1):92–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Low SH (2014) Convex relaxation of optimal power flow; Part I: formulations and equivalence. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 1(1):15–27

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Madani R, Sojoudi S, Lavaei J (2015) Convex relaxation for optimal power flow problem: mesh networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 30(1):199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. MATLAB (2014) version 8.3.0.532 (R2014a). The MathWorks Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Molzahn DK, Hiskens IA (2015) Sparsity-exploiting moment-based relaxations of the optimal power flow problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 30(6):3168–3180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Molzahn DK, Holzer J, Lesieutre B, DeMarco C (2013) Implementation of a lrage-scale optimal power flow solver based on semidefinite programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(4):3987–3998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Momoh JA (2001) Electric power system applications of optimization. Markel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. MOSEK ApS (2015) The MOSEK optimization toolbox for MATLAB manual. Version 7.1 (Revision 28). http://docs.mosek.com/7.1/toolbox/index.html

  38. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2006) Western wind resources dataset. http://wind.nrel.gov/Web_nrel/

  39. Rebennack S, Kallrath J, Pardalos PM (2011) Optimal storage design for a multi-product plant: a non-convex MINLP formulation. Comput Chem Eng 35:255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rueda-Medina AC, Padilha-Feltrin A (2013) Distributed generators as providers of reactive power support–a market approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(1), 347–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Saraswat A, Saini A, Saxena AK (2013) A novel multi-zone reactive power market settlement model: a pareto-optimization approach. Energy 51(1):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Scaini V (2012) Grid support stability for reliable, renewable power. Tech. Rep., WP083002EN, Eaton Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sioshansi R, Denholm P, Jenkin T (2012) Market and policy barriers to deployment of energy storage. Econ Energy Environ Policy 1(2):47–63

    Google Scholar 

  44. Smith SC, Sen PK, Kroposki B, Malmedal K (2010) Renewable energy and energy storage systems in rural electrical power systems: issues, challenges and application guidelines. In: Proceeding of the IEEE Rural Electric Power Conference (REPC), pp B4-1–B4-7

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sojoudi S, Lavaei J (2012) Physics of power networks makes hard optimization problems easy to solve. In: Proceeding of the IEEE PES general meeting

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sojoudi S, Lavaei J (2013) Convexification of generalized network flow problem with application to power systems. In: Proceeding of 52nd IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 7552–7559

    Google Scholar 

  47. Thrampoulidis C, Bose S, Hassibi B (2013) Optimal placement of distributed energy storage in power networks. Tech. rep., Caltech

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tripathy S (1997) Improved load-frequency control with capacitive energy storage. Energy Convers Manag 38(6):551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. University of Washington (1993) Power systems test case archive. http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca

  50. Warrington J, Goulart P, Mariéthoz S, Morari M (2012) A market mechanism for solving multi-period optimal power flow exactly on AC networks with mixed participants. In: Proceeding of the American control conference, Montreal, QC, pp 3101–3107

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wogrin S, Gayme DF (2014) Optimizing storage siting, sizing and technology portfolios in transmission-constrained networks. Preprint

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wu B, Lang Y, Zargari N, Kouro S (2011) Power conversion and control of wind energy systems. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  53. Tan Z et al (2014) A two-stage scheduling optimization model and solution algorithm for wind power and energy storage system considering uncertainty and demand response. Electr Power Energy Syst 63:1057–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sánchez CE, Thomas RJ (2011) MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Trans Power Syst 26(1):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was partially supported through the National Science Foundation (grant numbers ECCS 1230788 and OISE 1243482) and Sandia National Laboratories’ Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program. The authors would also like to thank Benjamin Hobbs for useful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennice F. Gayme .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Castillo, A., Gayme, D.F. (2018). Profit Maximizing Storage Integration in AC Power Networks. In: Meyn, S., Samad, T., Hiskens, I., Stoustrup, J. (eds) Energy Markets and Responsive Grids. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, vol 162. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7822-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics