Skip to main content
  • 2553 Accesses

Abstract

Central neuraxial blocks (CNBs; spinal and epidural) are techniques that are frequently used for anesthesia or analgesia in the perioperative period and for managing chronic pain. Success of these techniques depends on one’s ability to accurately locate the epidural or the intrathecal space. Traditionally, CNBs are performed using surface anatomical landmarks, fascial clicks, visualizing the free flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and “loss of resistance.” Although anatomical landmarks are useful, they are often difficult to locate or palpate in patients with obesity [1], edema in their backs, and underlying spinal deformity or after spinal surgery. Even in the absence of the above, a given intervertebral space is accurately identified in only 30% [2, 3] of cases, and anesthesiologists very frequently incorrectly identify a space higher than intended [2, 4, 5], which has been attributed as a cause for injury of the conus medullaris [4] or spinal cord [6] after spinal anesthesia. This error is exaggerated by obesity [2] and as one tries to locate an intervertebral space in the upper spinal levels [2, 4, 5]. Therefore, the Tuffier’s line, a surface anatomical landmark that is ubiquitously used during CNB, is not a reliable landmark [5]. Moreover, because of the blind nature of the landmark-based techniques, it is not possible for the operator to predict the ease or difficulty of needle placement prior to skin puncture. Data from the United Kingdom indicate that 15% of spinal anesthetics are technically difficult [7], 10% require more than five attempts [7], and a failed CNB can occur in 5% of patients below the age of 50 [8]. Multiple attempts at needle placement can lead to pain and discomfort to the patient and injury to soft tissue structures that lie in the path of the advancing needle and may rarely result in complications, such as dural puncture, postdural puncture headache, or epidural hematoma. Therefore, any method that can reduce technical difficulties or assist the operator during CNB is desirable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stiffler KA, Jwayyed S, Wilber ST, Robinson A. The use of ultrasound to identify pertinent landmarks for lumbar puncture. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:331–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:1122–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S. An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:277–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmaas G, Frederiksen D, Ulvik A, Vingsnes SO, Ostgaard G, Nordli H. Identification of thoracic intervertebral spaces by means of surface anatomy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:368–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reynolds F. Damage to the conus medullaris following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:238–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamandi K, Mottershead J, Lewis T, Ormerod IC, Ferguson IT. Irreversible damage to the spinal cord following spinal anesthesia. Neurology. 2002;59:624–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tarkkila P, Huhtala J, Salminen U. Difficulties in spinal needle use. Insertion characteristics and failure rates associated with 25-, 27- and 29-gauge Quincke-type spinal needles. Anaesthesia. 1994;49:723–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seeberger MD, Lang ML, Drewe J, Schneider M, Hauser E, Hruby J. Comparison of spinal and epidural anesthesia for patients younger than 50 years of age. Anesth Analg. 1994;78:667–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klaastad O, Lilleas FG, Rotnes JS, Breivik H, Fosse E. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates lack of precision in needle placement by the infraclavicular brachial plexus block described by Raj et al. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:593–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perello A, Ashford NS, Dolin SJ. Coeliac plexus block using computed tomography guidance. Palliat Med. 1999;13:419–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eskey CJ, Ogilvy CS. Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar puncture: decreased frequency of traumatic tap and implications for the assessment of CT-negative acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:571–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:7–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:408–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gofeld M, Christakis M. Sonographically guided ilioinguinal nerve block. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:1571–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greher M, Scharbert G, Kamolz LP, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet nerve block: a sonoanatomic study of a new methodologic approach. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1242–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen CP, Tang SF, Hsu TC, et al. Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:181–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bogin IN, Stulin ID. Application of the method of 2-dimensional echospondylography for determining landmarks in lumbar punctures. Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 1971;71:1810–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Porter RW, Wicks M, Ottewell D. Measurement of the spinal canal by diagnostic ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978;60-B:481–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cork RC, Kryc JJ, Vaughan RW. Ultrasonic localization of the lumbar epidural space. Anesthesiology. 1980;52:513–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Currie JM. Measurement of the depth to the extradural space using ultrasound. Br J Anaesth. 1984;56:345–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wallace DH, Currie JM, Gilstrap LC, Santos R. Indirect sonographic guidance for epidural anesthesia in obese pregnant patients. Reg Anesth. 1992;17:233–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin EO, Motsch J. Paramedian access to the epidural space: the optimum window for ultrasound imaging. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13:213–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E. Ultrasound control for presumed difficult epidural puncture. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:766–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging facilitates localization of the epidural space during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:64–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grau T, Leipold RW, Delorme S, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging of the thoracic epidural space. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27:200–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:169–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grau T. The evaluation of ultrasound imaging for neuraxial anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:R1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:1047–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grau T, Leipold RW, Fatehi S, Martin E, Motsch J. Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:25–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Karmakar MK, Li X, Ho AM, Kwok WH, Chui PT. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:845–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferre RM, Sweeney TW. Emergency physicians can easily obtain ultrasound images of anatomical landmarks relevant to lumbar puncture. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:291–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Peterson MA, Abele J. Bedside ultrasound for difficult lumbar puncture. J Emerg Med. 2005;28:197–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Arzola C, Davies S, Rofaeel A, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1188–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carvalho JC. Ultrasound-facilitated epidurals and spinals in obstetrics. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26:145–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mathieu S, Dalgleish DJ. A survey of local opinion of NICE guidance on the use of ultrasound in the insertion of epidural catheters. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:1146–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on ultrasound guided catheterisation of the epidural space. Interventional Procedure Guidance No 249. http://www.nice.org.uk (2008).

  37. Karmakar MK, Li X, Kwok WH, Ho AM, Ngan Kee WD.: The “water-based-spine-phantom” – a small step towards learning the basics of spinal sonography. Brit J Anaesth. E-letters. http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/qa-display/short/brjana_el;4114 (2009).

  38. Tsui BC, Tarkkila P, Gupta S, Kearney R. Confirmation of caudal needle placement using nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:374–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen CP, Wong AM, Hsu CC, et al. Ultrasound as a screening tool for proceeding with caudal epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:358–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Habib AS, George RB, Allen TK, Olufolabi AJ. A pilot study to compare the Episure Autodetect syringe with the glass syringe for identification of the epidural space in parturients. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:541–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rapp HJ, Folger A, Grau T. Ultrasound-guided epidural catheter insertion in children. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:333–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Costello JF, Balki M. Cesarean delivery under ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia [corrected] in a parturient with poliomyelitis and Harrington instrumentation. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55:606–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Prasad GA, Tumber PS, Lupu CM. Ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55:716–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Coley BD, Shiels WE, Hogan MJ. Diagnostic and interventional ultrasonography in neonatal and infant lumbar puncture. Pediatr Radiol. 2001;31:399–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yamauchi M, Honma E, Mimura M, Yamamoto H, Takahashi E, Namiki A. Identification of the lumbar intervertebral level using ultrasound imaging in a post-laminectomy patient. J Anesth. 2006;20:231–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yeo ST, French R. Combined spinal-epidural in the obstetric patient with Harrington rods assisted by ultrasonography. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:670–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chin KJ, Chan VW, Ramlogan R, Perlas A. Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in patients with a challenging spinal anatomy: two case reports. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:252–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. McLeod A, Roche A, Fennelly M. Case series: ultrasonography may assist epidural insertion in scoliosis patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:717–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Asakura Y, Kandatsu N, Hashimoto A, Kamiya M, Akashi M, Komatsu T. Ultrasound-guided neuroaxial anesthesia: accurate diagnosis of spina bifida occulta by ultrasonography. J Anesth. 2009;23:312–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Balki M, Lee Y, Halpern S, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in the transverse plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space in obese parturients. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1876–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee Y, Tanaka M, Carvalho JC. Sonoanatomy of the lumbar spine in patients with previous unintentional dural punctures during labor epidurals. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:266–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Margarido CB, Arzola C, Balki M, Carvalho JC. Anesthesiologists learning curves for ultrasound assessment of the lumbar spine. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:120–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

All the figures have been reproduced with permission from www.aic.cuhk.edu.hk/usgraweb.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj Kumar Karmakar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karmakar, M.K. (2018). Ultrasound-Guided Central Neuraxial Blocks. In: Narouze, S. (eds) Atlas of Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in Interventional Pain Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7754-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7754-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7752-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7754-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics