Skip to main content

Taig’s Quadrilateral Elements

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Finite Element Concepts
  • 1619 Accesses

Abstract

A Clarification Taig did not use the term isoparametric,in his 1962 report (Taig, Structural analysis by the matrix displacement method. Tech.rep., British Aircraft Corporation, Warton Aerodrome: English Electric Aviation Limited, Report Number SO 17 based on work performed ca. 1957, 1962). This seminal publication introduced his quadrilateral elements. In 1968,Ergatoudis, Irons, and Zienkiewicz coined (To the best of the author’s knowledge, the use of the term isoparametric thus ensued.):“…for lack of a better name,as the isoparametric quadrilateral.”  (Ergatoudis et al., Int J Solids Struct 4(1):31–42, 1968).In 1974, Ian C. Taig and Bruce Irons were awarded the Von Karman prize, for the introduction of isoparametric element concepts. From §3.3, page 167 of Strang and Fix (An analysis of the finite element method. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 1973) (Strang and Fix do not credit Taig in their monograph.):“isoparametric means that the same polynomial elements are chosen for coordinate changes for the trial functions themselves;…”

Computation vis-à-vis Calculation To distinguish calculation from computation, we observe that Taig’s interpolants along with numerical quadratures, Li et al. provide a calculation method whereas a general implementation on all quadrilaterals, including convex ones with curved boundary establishes a computational procedure (Li et al., Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(51):4531–4548, 2008).

Triangular to Quadrilateral Finite Elements Ian Taig, in his 1962 report, introduced four-node elements capturing stress/strain profiles beyond Clough’s triangles that are restricted to constant stress/strain distributions. Taig’s intent was to capture bending stresses (spatially linear axial stresses/strains) in beam elements that Taig termed panels. He guaranteed linear displacement on straight boundary edges. This ensured perfect inter-element compatibility. Wilson interpreted Taig’s interpolants as the elements’ natural coordinates (Wilson, Static and dynamic analysis of structures. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, 2003). Subsequently, researchers analyzed bending in plates and shells, e.g. Zhu et al. (Int J Mod Phys B 19(01n03):687–690, 2005), by overcoming thetoo-stiffconstant stress/strain elements.

Taig’s Interpolations in the Physical (x, y)-FrameAll textbooks and industrial manuals extensively cover the plane quadrilateral elements that Taig introduced.Research and teaching materials, which can be easily accessed on the internet, need no repetition. This chapter analyzes Taig’s formulation in algebraic terms in the interest of brevity and clarity.We can derive that, in general, Taig’s parametric interpolants involve the square root of quadratic expressions in the physical (x, y) frame.For trapezoids Taig’s interpolants become rational polynomials—a quadratic in (x, y) divided by a linear expression in (x, y).Wachspress addressed this issue completely (Wachspress, A rational finite element basis. Academic, New York, 1975; Rational bases and generalized barycentrics: applications to finite elements and graphics. Springer, New York, 2015). Convex, concave, and elements with curved boundaries are treated using projective geometry concepts.

Symbolic Closed-Form ExpressionsTaig in §2.3 of his 1962 report formulated closed-form expressions of element stiffness matrices for a rectangular element that he termed “Rectangular Sheet panel.” He revisited “Triangular Sheet panel”  in §2.4 of his 1962 report and furnished closed-formexpressions for the stiffness matrix. This encouraged the author to analyze all quadrilateral elements using symbolic computational tools.

Taig’s Analysis of Trapezoidal and General Quadrilateral ElementsTaig clearly pointed out the difficulties in determining the element stiffness matrix for non-rectangular elements.He presented stiffness matrices for trapezoidal elements in closed-form (vide pages 59 and 60 of Taig (1962)—“MATRIX IV”). General convex or concave quadrilateral elements were not included in the Report.

Numerical EvaluationTaig, in §6 of his 1962 report,extensively described the steps employed in “Formulation for automatic Computation.” Programs for DEUCE computers (of 1959) were elaborated.

Impact of Taig’s WorkFollowing the spirit of the aforementioned pioneering work of Ian C. Taig, complete Mathematica codes are furnished in this textbook for scalar field problems.However,generalization to deal with elastic elements, where the displacement vector components are coupled through Poisson’s ratio, demanded looking back to Lord Rayleigh’s formulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.fcet.staffs.ac.uk/jdw1/sucfm/eedeuce/people.html#160 in the section: BRITISH AIRCRAFT CORPORATION—WARTON—LANCASHIRE.

  2. 2.

    The most popular bi-linear interpolants originally appeared in the (unpublished) report of PRESTON DIVISION, Warton Aerodrome, Lancashire, UK, vide Fig. 5.1a.

    Fig. 5.1
    figure 1

    Facsimiles of covers of two historical documents related to finite elements beyond constant stress/strain triangular elements. (a) Cover: Taig’s report SO17. (b) Cover: DEUCE handbook

  3. 3.

    Vide Fig. 5.1b.

  4. 4.

    A full polynomial of degree n in (x, y) has a constant, linear, quadratic …terms in (x, y) of the form x ni y i, i = 0…n. From the functional analysis point of view, polynomials are not complete, because limits of polynomials are not polynomials—hence we avoid the term “complete polynomial.”

  5. 5.

    Taig did not use the notation \(\mathcal{N}(\xi,\eta ),\) the author introduced it for convenience.

  6. 6.

    Available literature seldom takes advantage of this versatile feature, because conventional numerical quadrature for the strain energy density cannot be carried out. There is no such restriction when the exact integration is implemented, vide  Appendix E.

  7. 7.

    However, unlike perspective geometry, an interior straight line curves (or distorts).

  8. 8.

    This will be shown in Sect. 5.5.2.3.

  9. 9.

    For rectangles, \(\mathcal{N}_{i}(\xi,\eta )\) are quadratic in (x,y) and are exact without any error. The numerical quadrature for \(\big(\left [b\right ]^{T}\ \left [d\right ]\ \left [b\right ]\big)\) is also exact. This will be shown in Sect. 6.1.1.

  10. 10.

    This form of neater printing is needed for square root expressions as shown in Eqs. (5.13a) through (5.14d).

  11. 11.

    The three-dimensional extensions, e.g. [6], also, follow quite naturally.

  12. 12.

    Point-wise equilibrium is not guaranteed; in general, the analytical solution would not be reproduced by this displacement approximation, as focused in Sect. 6.

  13. 13.

    The isoparametric finite element is the most published item in the finite element literature. The author encourages the readers to study Taig’s original masterpiece.

  14. 14.

    The author learned from private communications that the work was done ca. 1957.

  15. 15.

    Parameters (s, t) keep the Mathematica coding simple, without Greek characters.

  16. 16.

    There is a typographical error in the first equation; here, x is corrected by x 1. 

  17. 17.

    Equations (5.2b) and (5.3a) furnish the same interpolations for (x, y) and (u, v).

  18. 18.

    Just a reminder, the Mathematica input/ouput indicators;

    e.g. “In[30]:=” or “Out[30]=” should not be typed in.

  19. 19.

    The Mathematica function NIntegrate has adaptive built-in methods.

  20. 20.

    The author of this textbook underlined the last two words.

  21. 21.

    Wilson in [15, §6.1], remarked: “However, the results produced by the non-rectangular isoparametric element were not impressive.”

References

  1. Dasgupta G (2008) Closed-form isoparametric shape functions of four-node convex finite elements. J Aerosp Eng ASCE 21:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dasgupta G (2008) Stiffness matrices of isoparametric four-node finite elements by exact analytical integration. J Aerosp Eng ASCE 21(2):45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dasgupta G, Wachspress E (2008) Basis functions for concave polygons. Comput Math Appl 56(2):459–468

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ergatoudis I, Irons BM, Zienkiewicz OC (1968) Curved, isoparametric, “quadrilateral” elements for finite element analysis. Int J Solids Struct 4(1):31–42

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hassani B, Tavakkoli S (2005) Derivation of incompatible modes in nonconforming finite elements using hierarchical shape functions. Asian J Civ Eng (Building and Housing) 6(3):153–165

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong-Guang L, Cen S, Cen ZZ (2008) Hexahedral volume coordinate method (HVCM) and improvements on 3d Wilson hexahedral element. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(51):4531–4548

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Li HG, Cen S, Cen ZZ (2008) Hexahedral volume coordinate method (HVCM) and improvements on 3d Wilson hexahedral element. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(51): 4531–4548

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Malsch EA (2003) Interpolation constraints and thermal distributions: a method for all non-concave polygons. Int J Solids Struct 41(8):2165–2188

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Möbius AF (1827) Der barycentrische Calcul ein neues Hülfsmittel zur analytischen Behandlung der Geometrie. Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig, Germany, hildesheim, Germany: Georg Olms, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  10. Strang G, Fix GJ (1973) An analysis of the finite element method. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Taig IC (1962) Structural analysis by the matrix displacement method. Tech. rep., British Aircraft Corporation, Warton Aerodrome: English Electric Aviation Limited, Report Number SO 17 based on work performed ca, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor RL, Beresford PJ, Wilson EL (1976) A nonconforming element for stress analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 10:1211–1219

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wachspress EL (1975) A rational finite element basis. Academic, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wachspress EL (2015) Rational bases and generalized barycentrics: applications to finite elements and graphics. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson EL (2003) Static and dynamic analysis of structures. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson EL, Ibrahimbegovic A (1990) Use of incompatible displacement modes for the calculation of element stiffnesses or stresses. Finite Elem Anal Des 7(3):229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson EL, Taylor RL, Doherty WP, Ghaboussi J (1973) Incompatible displacement models. In: Fenves SJ, Perrone N, Robinson AR, Schnobrich WC (eds) Numerical and computer models in structural mechanics. Academic, New York, pp 43–57

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu Y, Wu C, Zhu Y (2005) An improved area-coordinate based quadrilateral shell element in dynamic explicit FEA. Int J Mod Phys B 19(01n03):687–690

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dasgupta, G. (2018). Taig’s Quadrilateral Elements. In: Finite Element Concepts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7423-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7423-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7421-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7423-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics