Land Use Change, Ethanol Production Expansion and Food Security in Brazil

  • Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira FilhoEmail author
  • Mark Horridge
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 40)


The concurrence of major increases in ethanol production and world commodity price increases were captured by the ‘food-versus-fuel’ dilemma around 2008. Brazil is the largest producer of ethanol worldwide and still has vast tracts of natural land available. This paper uses Brazil as case study to simulate food security and environmental impacts, especially on forests, of increased biofuel production. Results show that sugarcane production is concentrated in higher productivity regions so reaching the 2022 ethanol target would require only 0.07 Mha of new land, or 0.02% additional deforestation over baseline. Second, per-area production intensifies as land prices increase, indicating a nonlinear relationship between land area and production. Specifically, results indicate an average indirect land use change effect of 0.083 ha of new agricultural land for every 1.0 ha of additional sugarcane. Current discussions of biofuel expansion miss this critical point of intensification, which results from market forces and technological change. These results are assumed to be driven solely by cost-minimizing behavior, thus leaving significant room for policy to expand agricultural research resulting in greater per unit output and subsequent environmental benefits. Finally, results support historical data that land use change due to biofuel production has little impact on food security.


Land use Change Ethanol production Food security Brazil 


  1. Arima, E.Y., P. Richards, R. Walker, and M.M. Caldas. 2011. Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 6, 024010 (7 pp) doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/.
  2. Babcock, B. 2009. Measuring unmeasureable land-use changes from biofuels. Iowa Ag Review. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development. Summer Vol. 15, no. 3.Google Scholar
  3. Barona, E., N. Ramankutty, G. Hyman, and O.T. Coomes. 2010. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 5, 024002 (9).Google Scholar
  4. BNDES 2008. Bioetanol de cana-de-açúcar: energia para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Organização BNDES e CGEE—Rio de Janeiro. 316 p.Google Scholar
  5. BRASIL 2010. Segunda Comunicação Nacional do Brasil à Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre Mudança Global do Clima. Brasília: MCT, 2010. Available at: Access in February 13, 2012.
  6. Collins, Keith. 2008. The Role of Biofuels and Other Factors in Increasing Farm and Food Prices: A Review of Recent Developments with a Focus on Feed Grain Markets and Market Prospects. Supporting material for a review conducted by Kraft Foods Global, Inc. of the current situation in farm and food markets, June 19. Available at
  7. Elliott, K. 2008. Biofuels and the Food Price Crisis: A Survey of the Issues. Center for Global Development. Working Paper no. 151. August.Google Scholar
  8. EPE. Plano Decenal de Expansão de Energia 2022. Ministério de Minas e Energia. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética.Google Scholar
  9. Ferez, J. 2010. Produção de etanol e seus impactos sobre o uso da Terra no Brasil. 48º. Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural. Campo Grande, MS. Anais (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
  10. Ferreira Filho, J.B.S., and M.J. Horridge. 2009. “The world increase in ethanol demand and poverty in Brazil.” In Twelfth Annual Conference on Global Trade Analysis.Google Scholar
  11. Ferreira Filho, J.B.S., and M. Horridge. 2014. Ethanol expansion and the indirect land use change in Brazil. Land Use Policy 36 (2014): 595–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreira, F.H.G., A. Fruttero, P. Leite, and L. Lucchetti. 2011. Rising Food Prices and Household Welfare: evidence from Brazil in 2008. Policy Research Working Paper 5652. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  13. Ferreira Filho, J.B.S. 2010. World food prices increases and Brazil: an opportunity for everyone? In: Carlos de Miguel; José Durán de Lima; Paolo Giordano; Julio Guzmán; Andrés Scuchny; Masakazu Watanuki (orgs). Modeling Public Policies in Latin America and the Caribbean. 1 ed. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publications. V1. P. 231–253.Google Scholar
  14. Ferreira Filho J.B.S., J.M. Horridge. 2012. Endogenous land use and supply and food security in Brazil. In: 15th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis. Geneva.Google Scholar
  15. Homem de Melo, F.B., and E.G. Fonseca. 1981. Proálcool, energia e transportes.” Pioneira: São Paulo.Google Scholar
  16. IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Agrícola Municipal.Google Scholar
  17. INPE—Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. Projeto PRODES: Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite. Google Scholar
  18. Lapola, D.M., J.A.R. Schaldach, J. Alcamo, A. Bondeau, J. Koch, C. Koelding, and J.A. Priess. 2010. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (February (8)), 3388–3393.Google Scholar
  19. Macedo, M.N., R.S. DeFriesa, D.C. Mortonb, C.M. Sticklerc, G.L. Galfordd, and Y.E. Shimabukuroe. 2012. Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. PNAS 109(4):1341–1346.Google Scholar
  20. Martha Jr, B. Geraldo, Elisio Contini, and Eliseu Alves. “12. Embrapa: its origins and changes.” The regional impact of national policies: the case of Brazil (2012): 204.Google Scholar
  21. Nassar, A.M., L.B. Antoniazzi, M.R. Moreira, L. Chiodi, and L. Harfuch 2010. Contribuição do Setor Sucroalcooleiro para a Matriz Energética e para a Mitigação de Gases do Efeito Estufa no Brasil. Available at
  22. Rudorff, B.F.T., D.A. Aguiar, W.F. Silva, L.M. Sugawara, M. Adami, and M.A. Moreira. 2010. Studies on the Rapid Expansion of Sugarcane for Ethanol Production in São Paulo State (Brazil) Using Landsat Data. Remote Sensing V.2, 1057–1076; doi: 10.3390/rs2041057.
  23. Silva, J.G., J.B.S. Ferreira Filho, M. Horridge 2014. Greenhouse gases mitigation by agriculture and livestock intensification in Brazil. In 17th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis. Center for Global Trade Analysis. Dakar.Google Scholar
  24. Trostle, R. 2008. Global Agricultural Supply and Demand: Factors Contributing to the Recent Increase in Food Commodity Prices. WRS-0801. Economic Research Service. USDA.Google Scholar
  25. Yacobucci, Brent D., and Randy Schnepf. 2007. “Selected Issues Related to an Expansion of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).” CRS Report No. RL34265. Washington: Congressional Research Service, December.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira Filho
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark Horridge
    • 2
  1. 1.Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”Universidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Centre of Policy StudiesVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations