Advertisement

On Diagnostic Checking Autoregressive Conditional Duration Models with Wavelet-Based Spectral Density Estimators

  • Pierre DuchesneEmail author
  • Yongmiao Hong
Chapter
  • 913 Downloads
Part of the Fields Institute Communications book series (FIC, volume 78)

Abstract

There has been an increasing interest recently in the analysis of financial data that arrives at irregular intervals. An important class of models is the autoregressive Conditional Duration (ACD) model introduced by Engle and Russell (Econometrica 66:1127–1162, 1998, [22]) and its various generalizations. These models have been used to describe duration clustering for financial data such as the arrival times of trades and price changes. However, relatively few evaluation procedures for the adequacy of ACD models are currently available in the literature. Given its simplicity, a commonly used diagnostic test is the Box-Pierce/Ljung-Box statistic adapted to the estimated standardized residuals of ACD models, but its asymptotic distribution is not the standard one due to parameter estimation uncertainty. In this paper we propose a test for duration clustering and a test for the adequacy of ACD models using wavelet methods. The first test exploits the one-sided nature of duration clustering. An ACD process is positively autocorrelated at all lags, resulting in a spectral mode at frequency zero. In particular, it has a spectral peak at zero when duration clustering is persistent or when duration clustering is small at each individual lag but carries over a long distributional lag. As a joint time-frequency decomposition method, wavelets can effectively capture spectral peaks and thus are expected to be powerful. Our second test checks the adequacy of an ACD model by using a wavelet-based spectral density of the estimated standardized residuals over the whole frequency. Unlike the Box-Pierce/Ljung-Box tests, the proposed diagnostic test has a convenient asymptotic “nuisance parameter-free” property—parameter estimation uncertainty has no impact on the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic. Moreover, it can check a wide range of alternatives and is powerful when the spectrum of the standardized duration residuals is nonsmooth, as can arise from neglected persistent duration clustering, seasonality, calender effects and business cycles. For each of the two new tests, we propose and justify a suitable data-driven method to choose the finest scale—the smoothing parameter in wavelet estimation. This makes the methods fully operational in practice. We present a simulation study, illustrating the merits of the wavelet-based procedures. An application with tick-by-tick trading data of Alcoa stock is presented.

Keywords

Autoregressive conditional duration Duration clustering High frequency financial time series Model adequacy Parameter estimation uncertainty Spectral density Standardized duration residual Wavelet 

AMS Mathematics Subject Classifications (2010)

62M10 62M15 62E20 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank W. K. Li, David Stanford, Hao Yu, and two referees for constructive suggestions, which led to an improved paper. Funding in partial support of this work was provided by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. 1.
    Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. (1988). A theory of intraday patterns: Volume and price variability. Review of Financial Studies, 1, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews, D. W. K. (1991). Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica, 59, 817–858.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andrews, D. W. K. (2001). Testing when a parameter is on the boundary of the maintained hypothesis. Econometrica, 69, 683–734.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bauwens, L., & Giot, P. (2000). The logarithmic ACD model: An application to the bid-ask quote process of three NYSE stocks. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 60, 117–149.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauwens, L., & Giot, P. (2001). Econometric modelling of stock market intraday activity. Advances studies in theoretical and applied econometrics. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bauwens, L., & Giot, P. (2003). Asymmetric ACD Models: Introducing price information in ACD models. Empir. Econ., 28, 709–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beltrao, K., & Bloomfield, P. (1987). Determining the bandwidth of a kernel spectrum estimate. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 8, 21–38.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bera, A. K., & Higgins, M. L. (1992). A test for conditional heteroskedasticity in time series models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 13, 501–519.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bizer, D. S., & Durlauf, S. N. (1990). Testing the positive theory of government finance. Journal of Monetary Economics, 26, 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Box, G. E. P., & Pierce, D. (1970). Distribution of residual autocorrelations in autoregressive integrated moving average time series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1509–1526.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bühlmann, P. (1996). Locally adaptive lag-window spectral estimation. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 17, 247–270.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daubechies, I. (1992). Ten lectures on wavelets. In CBS-NSF regional conferences in applied mathematics (Vol. 61). Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drost, F. C., & Werker, B. J. M. (2000). Efficient estimation in semiparametric time series: The ACD model. Working paper, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drost, F. C., & Werker, B. J. M. (2004). Semiparametric duration models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22, 40–50.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duchesne, P. (2006a). On testing for serial correlation with a wavelet-based spectral density estimator in multivariate time series. Econometric Theory, 22, 633–676.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duchesne, P. (2006b). Testing for multivariate autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity using wavelets. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 2142–2163.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duchesne, P., Li, L., & Vandermeerschen, J. (2010). On testing for serial correlation of unknown form using wavelet thresholding. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 54, 2512–2531.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duchesne, P., & Pacurar, M. (2008). Evaluating financial time series models for irregularly spaced data: A spectral density approach. Computers & Operations Research (Special Issue: Applications of OR in Finance), 35, 130–155.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Easley, D., & O’Hara, M. (1992). Time and the process of security price adjustment. The Journal of Finance, 19, 69–90.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Engle, R. F. (2000). The econometrics of ultra-high frequency data. Econometrica, 68, 1–22.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Engle, R. F., & Russell, J. R. (1997). Forecasting the frequency of changes in quoted foreign exchange prices with the autoregressive conditional duration model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 4, 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Engle, R. F., & Russell, J. R. (1998). Autoregressive conditional duration: A new model for irregularly spaced transaction data. Econometrica, 66, 1127–1162.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Escanciano, J. C. (2006). Goodness-of-fit tests for linear and nonlinear time series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 531–541.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fan, Y., & Gençay, R. (2010). Unit root tests with wavelets. Econometric Theory, 26, 1305–1331.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Francq, C., Roy, R., & Zakoïan, J.-M. (2005). Diagnostic checking in ARMA models with uncorrelated errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 532–544.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Francq, C., & Zakoïan, J.-M. (2009). Testing the nullity of GARCH coefficients: Correction of the standard tests and relative efficiency comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 313–324.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fernandes, M., & Grammig, J. (2005). Non-parametric specification tests for conditional duration models. Journal of Econometrics, 127, 35–68.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gao, H. (1993). Wavelet estimation of spectral densities in time series analysis. Ph.D Dissertation, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gençay, R., & Signori, D. (2012). Multi-scale tests for serial correlation. Technical report, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gençay, R., Yazgan, E., & Ozkan, H. (2012). A test of structural change of unknown location with wavelets. Technical report, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ghysels, E., & Jasiak, J. (1994). Stochastic volatility and time deformation: an application to trading volume and leverage effects. Working paper, C.R.D.E., Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ghysels, E., & Jasiak, J. (1998). Long-term dependence in trading. Working paper, Dept. of Economics, Penn State University and York University.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ghysels, E., & Jasiak, J. (1998). GARCH for irregularly spaced financial data: The ACD-GARCH model. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 2, 133–149.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grammig, J., Hujer, R., Kokot, S., & Maurer, K.-O. (1998). Modeling the Deutsche Telekom IPO using a new ACD specification, an application of the Burr-ACD model using high frequency IBIS data. Working paper, Department of Economics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University of Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Granger, C. (1966). The typical spectral shape of an economic variable. Econometrica, 34, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1986). Forecasting economic time series (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hall, P., & Heyde, C. C. (1980). Martingale limit theory and its application. New York: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hannan, E. (1970). Multiple time series. New York: Wiley.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hautsch, N. (2006). Testing the conditional mean function of autoregressive conditional duration models. Working Paper, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hernandez, E., & Weiss, G. (1996). A first course on wavelets. New York: CRC Press.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Higgins, M. L. (2000). Testing for autoregressive conditional duration. Presented at World Congress of Econometric Society, Seattle.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hong, Y. (2001). Wavelet-based estimation for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent variance-covariance matrices. Working paper, Department of Economics and Department of Statistical Science, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hong, Y., & Kao, C. (2004). Wavelet-based testing for serial correlation of unknown form in panel models. Econometrica, 72, 1519–1563.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hong, Y., & Lee, J. (2001). One-sided testing for ARCH effect using wavelets. Econometric Theory, 17, 1051–1081.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hong, Y., & Lee, Y.-J. (2011). Detecting misspecifications in autoregressive conditional duration models and non-negative time-series processes. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 32, 1–32.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jasiak, J. (1999). Persistence in intertrade durations. Finance, 19, 166–195.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jensen, M. J. (2000). An alternative maximum likelihood estimator of long memory processes using compactly supported wavelets. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, 361–387.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kyle, A. (1985). Continuous time auctions and insider trading. Econometrica, 53, 1315–1336.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lee, J. H. H., & King, M. L. (1993). A locally most mean powerful based score test for ARCH and GARCH regression disturbances. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 11, 17–27 (Correction 1994, 12, p. 139).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lee, J., & Hong, Y. (2001). Testing for serial correlation of unknown form using wavelet methods. Econometric Theory, 17, 386–423.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Li, L., Yao, S., & Duchesne, P. (2014). On wavelet-based testing for serial correlation of unknown form using Fan’s adaptive Neyman method. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 70, 308–327.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Li, W. K. (2004). Diagnostic checks in time series. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Li, W. K., & Mak, T. K. (1994). On the square residual autocorrelations in non-linear time series with conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 15, 627–636.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Li, W. K., & Yu, L. H. (2003). On the residual autocorrelation of the autoregressive conditional duration model. Economics Letters, 79, 169–175.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mallat, S. G. (1989). A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 674–693.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Meitz, M., & Teräsvirta, T. (2006). Evaluating models of autoregressive conditional duration. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24, 104–124.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Neumann, M. H. (1996). Spectral density estimation via nonlinear wavelet methods for stationary non-Gaussian time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 17, 601–633.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Review of Financial Studies, 61, 631–653.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pacurar, M. (2008). Autoregressive conditional duration models in finance: A survey of the theoretical and empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 711–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Percival, D. B., & Walden, A. T. (2000). Wavelet methods for time series analysis, Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Priestley, M. B. (1981). Spectral analysis and time series. London: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Priestley, M. B. (1996). Wavelets and time-dependent spectral analysis. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 17, 85–103.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ramsey, J. (1999). The contribution of wavelets to the analysis of economic and financial data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering, 537, 2593–2606.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Robinson, P. M. (1991). Automatic frequency domain inference on semiparametric and nonparametric models. Econometrica, 59, 1329–1363.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Stock, J. (1988). Estimating continuous time processes subject to time deformation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 77–85.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tauchen, G., & Pitts, M. (1983). The price variability-volume relationship on speculative markets. Econometrica, 51, 485–505.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tsay, R. S. (2005). Analysis of financial time series (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tsay, R. S. (2013). An introduction to analysis of financial data with R. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Vidakovic, B. (1999). Statistical modeling by wavelets. New York: Wiley.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wang, Y. (1995). Jump and sharp cusp detection by wavelets. Biometrika, 82, 385–397.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Watson, N. W. (1993). Measures of fit for calibrated models. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 1011–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Xue, Y., Gençay, R., & Fagan, S. (2010). Jump detection with wavelets. Technical report, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zhang, M. Y., Russell, J. R., & Tsay, R. S. (2001). A nonlinear autoregressive conditional duration model with applications to financial transaction data. Journal of Econometrics, 104, 179–207.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zhu, K., & Li, W. K. (2015). A bootstrapped spectral test for adequacy in weak ARMA models. Journal of Econometrics, 187, 113–130.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de Mathématiques et de StatistiqueUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations