Skip to main content

A Brief Derivation of the Asymptotic Distribution of Pearson’s Statistic and an Accurate Approximation to Its Exact Distribution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Time Series Methods and Applications

Part of the book series: Fields Institute Communications ((FIC,volume 78))

Abstract

A brief and accessible derivation of the asymptotic distribution of Pearson’s goodness-of-fit statistic is proposed. Additionally, a shifted gamma distribution is introduced as an accurate approximation to be utilized when the chi-squared distribution proves to be inadequate. It is also explained that the exact probability mass function of this test statistic can be readily determined from its moment-generating function via symbolic computations. Two illustrative numerical examples are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrés, A. M., & Tejedor, I. H. (2009). Comments on ‘Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2\(\times \)2 contingency tables’. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 528–531.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cochran, W. G. (1952). The \(\chi ^2\) test of goodness of fit. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 315–345.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cox, M. K., & Key, C. H. (1993). Post hoc pair-wise comparisons for the chi-square test of homogeneity of proportions. Key Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 951–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DasGupta, A. (2008). Asymptotic theory of statistics and probability, Springer Texts in Statistics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferguson, T. S. (1996). A course in large sample theory. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Graybill, F. A. (1983). Matrices with applications in statistics. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Koehler, K. J., & Larntz, K. (1980). An empirical investigation of goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse multinomials. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 336–344.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathai, A. M., & Pederzoli, G. (1996). A simple derivation of the chi-square approximation to Pearson’s statistic. Statistica, 56, 407–413.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore, D. S., & Spruill, M. C. (1975). Unified large-sample theory of general chi-squared statistics for tests of fit. Annals of Statistics, 3, 599–616.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Nathan, G. (1972). On the asymptotic power of tests for independence in contingency tables from stratified samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 917–920.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine, 50, 157–175.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Roscoe, J. T., & Byars, J. A. (1971). An investigation of the restraints with respect to sample size commonly imposed on the use of the chi-square statistic. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66, 755–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosner, B. (2006). Fundamentals of biostatistics. Chapter 10. Chi-square goodness-of-fit (6th ed.). Duxbury, MA: Thomson Learning Academic Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationship for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Watson, G. S. (1959). Some recent results in chi-square goodness-of-fit tests. Biometrics, 15, 440–468.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yates, F. (1934). Contingency table involving small numbers and the \(\chi ^2\) test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1, 217–235.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also due to two referees for their valuable comments. This Festschrift, which was organized in recognition of Ian McLeod’s significant contributions to Time Series as well as several other areas of Statistics, is indeed a fitting tribute to his scholarly accomplishments. Ian has truly been a valued colleague over the years.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serge B. Provost .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Provost, S.B. (2016). A Brief Derivation of the Asymptotic Distribution of Pearson’s Statistic and an Accurate Approximation to Its Exact Distribution. In: Li, W., Stanford, D., Yu, H. (eds) Advances in Time Series Methods and Applications . Fields Institute Communications, vol 78. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6568-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics