Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Origins of Ethnolinguistic Identity in Southeast Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of East and Southeast Asian Archaeology

Abstract

There are five major language phyla in mainland Southeast Asia : Austroasiatic , Austronesian , Daic , Sino-Tibetan and Hmong-Mien, but no true isolates except on offshore islands. Despite a considerable expansion of research in recent years, models for the dates, homelands and engines of expansion of these phyla are scarce in the literature, as are convincing correlations with archaeological and genetic research. A proposal that has been extended to the language phyla of the world and has been influential far out of proportion to its evidential base is the idea that phylic expansions are driven by agriculture. Although this is clearly true in a small number of cases, its explanatory value has been undermined by the difficulties of validating it in many situations. The chapter will consider the proposals that have been advanced for the phyla of Mainland SE Asia (MSEA), their credibility, and will put forward some new hypotheses, particularly with respect to their chronology and geographical interleaving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

#:

Quasi-reconstruction, form based on rapid inspection of cognates rather than in-depth historical reconstruction

*:

Reconstructed form based on in-depth historical reconstruction

ISEA:

Island SE Asia

MSEA:

Mainland SE Asia

mtDNA:

Mitochondrial DNA

References

  • Abbi, A. (2006). Endangered languages of the Andaman islands. Munich: Lincom Europa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbi, A. (2012). Dictionary of the great Andamanese language (english—great Andamanese—hindi), first edition with a CD-ROM. Delhi: Ratna Sagar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acabado, S. (2014). Landscapes and the archaeology of the Ifugao agricultural terraces: Establishing antiquity and social organisation. Hukay, 15, 31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaud, V. (1974). La culture du millet chez les Yami, population austronésienne de Botel Tobago. Journal d’Agriculture Traditionnelle et de Botanique Appliquée, 10–12, 275–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. S. (1996). Identifying the Tai Substratum in Cantonese. In P. A. Linguistics (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on languages and linguistics V: 1806–1844. Bangkok: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Mahidol University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood, P. (1984/85). A hypothesis for Austronesian origins. Asian Perspectives 20, 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood, P. (1995). Austronesian prehistory in Southeast Asia: Homeland, expansion and transformation. In P. Bellwood, J. Fox & D. Tryon (Eds.), The austronesians (pp. 96–111). Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood, P. (2005). First farmers: The origins of agricultural societies. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood, P. (2013). First migrants: Ancient migration in global perspective. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, P. K. (1972). Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus (“STC”). In J. A. Matisoff, contributing (Ed.), Princeton-Cambridge series in Chinese Linguistics #2. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, P. K. (1975). Austro-Thai: Language and culture, with a glossary of roots. New Haven: Human Relations Areas Files Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M. (2005). From the mountains to the valleys: Understanding ethnolinguistic geography in SE Asia. In L. Sagart, R. M. Blench, & A. Sanchez-Mazas (Eds.), The peopling of East Asia (pp. 31–50). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M. (2008). Stratification in the peopling of China: How far does the linguistic evidence match genetics and archaeology? In A. Sanchez-Mazas, R. M. Blench, M. D. Ross, I. Peiros, & M. Lin (Eds.), Human migrations in continental East Asia and Taiwan. Matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics (pp. 105–132). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M. (2009). Remapping the Austronesian expansion. In B. Evans (Ed.), Discovering history through language. Papers in honour of Malcolm Ross (pp. 35–59). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M. (2011). The role of agriculture in the evolution of Southeast Asian language phyla. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Dynamics of human diversity in mainland SE Asia (pp. 125–152). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M. (2012). Almost everything you believed about the Austronesians isn’t true. In D. Bonatz, A. Reinecke, & M. L. Tjoa-Bonatz (Eds.), Crossing borders: Selected papers from the 13th international conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists (vol. 1, pp. 122–142). Singapore: NUS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M. (2013). The prehistory of the Daic (Tai-Kadai) speaking peoples and the hypothesis of an Austronesian connection. In M. J. Klokke & V. Degroot (Eds.), Unearthing Southeast Asia’s past: Selected papers from the 12th international conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists (Vol. 1, pp. 3–15). Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M. (2014a). The contribution of linguistics to understanding the foraging/farming transition in NE India. In T. T. Jamir & M. Hazarika (Eds.), 51 Years after Daojali Hading: Emerging perspectives in the Archaeology of Northeast India. Essays in Honour of T. C. Sharma. New Delhi: Research India Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M. (2014b). Language and archaeology: State of the art. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 638–661). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M. (In Press). Ethnographic and archaeological correlates for an MSEA linguistic area. In A. Acri, R. M. Blench, & A. Landmann (Eds.), Spirits and ships. Singapore: ISEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blench, R. M., & Post, M. (2013). Rethinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of Northeast Indian languages. In N. Hill & T. Owen-Smith (Eds.), Selected papers from the 16th himalayan languages symposium, September 2010 (pp. 71–104). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blust, R. A. (1995). The prehistory of the austronesian-speaking peoples: A view from language. Journal of World History, 9(4), 453–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blust, R. A. (1999). Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: Some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In E. Zeitoun & P. Jen-Kuei Li (Eds.), Selected papers from eighth international conference on austronesian linguistics (pp. 31–94). Taipei: Academica Sinica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulbeck, D. (2008). An integrated perspective on the Austronesian diaspora: The switch from cereal agriculture to maritime foraging in the colonisation of island SE Asia. Australian Archaeology, 67, 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Z. (2002). Archaeology and history -early settlements in the Andaman islands. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeter, F., Shackelford, L. L., Bacon, A. M., Duringer, P., Westaway, K., Sayavongkhamdy, T., et al. (2012). Anatomically modern human in Southeast Asia (Laos) by 46 ka. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(36), 14, 375–14, 380. Published ahead of print August 20, 2012. doi:10.1073/pnas.1208104109

  • Dempwolff, O. (1938). Vergleichende Lautlehre des austronesischen Wortschatzes, volume 3: Austronesisches Wörterverzeichnis. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, Supplement 19. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, T. (2004). The roots of agriculture and arboriculture in New Guinea: Looking beyond Austronesian expansion, Neolithic packages and indigenous origins. World Archaeology, 36, 610–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2001). Polynesian origins: Slow boat to Melanesia? Nature, 410, 167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diffloth, G. (2005). The contribution of linguistic palaeontology and Austroasiatic. In L. Sagart, R. Blench, & A. Sanchez-Mazas (Eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics (pp. 77–80). London: Routledge Curzon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diffloth, G. (2011). Austroasiatic word histories: Boat, husked rice and taro. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Dynamics of human diversity in mainland SE Asia (pp. 295–313). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diller, A. V. N., Edmondson, J. A., & Yongxian, L. (Eds.). (2008). The Tai-Kadai languages. Abington, Oxon UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobney, K., Cucchi, T., & Larson, G. (2008). The pigs of Island Southeast Asia and the Pacific: New evidence for taxonomic status and human-mediated dispersal. Asian Perspectives, 47, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, M., & Denham, T. (2010). Farming and language in island Southeast Asia: Reframing Austronesian history. Current Anthropology, 51(2), 223–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyen, I. (1963). The position of the Malayo-Polynesian languages of Formosa. Asian Perspectives, 7, 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, J. A., & Solnit, D. B. (Eds.). (1988). Comparative Kadai: linguistic studies beyond Tai. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, J. A., & Solnit, D. B. (Eds.). (1997a). Comparative Kadai: The Tai branch. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, J.A., & Solnit, D. B. (1997b). Introduction. In Comparative Kadai: The Tai branch (pp. 1–32). Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, P., Gilbert, M. T. P., Stringer, C., Lalueza-Fox, C., Willerslev, E., Hansen, A. J., et al. (2003). The genetic origins of Andaman Islanders. American Journal of Human Genetics, 72, 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, N. J. (2003). Linguistic epidemiology: SEMANTICS and grammar of language contact in mainland Southeast Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, N. J. (Ed.). (2011). Dynamics of human diversity in mainland SE Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethnologue. (2013). A guide to the world’s languages. Dallas: SIL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestier, H., Simanjuntak, T., Guillaud, D., Driwantoro, D., Wiradnyana, K., Siregar, D., et al. (2005). Le site de Tögi Ndrawa, île de Nias, Sumatra nord: Les premières traces d’une occupation hoabinhienne en grotte en Indonésie. Comptes Rendus Paléoevolution 4, 727–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, P., & Matsumura, S. (2005). Did early humans go North or South? Science 308(5,724):965–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, C., & Higham, T. (2009). A new chronological framework for prehistoric Southeast Asia, based on a Bayesian model from Ban Non Wat. Antiquity, 83, 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higham, C., Higham, T., & Kijngam, A. (2011). Cutting a Gordian Knot: The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia: Origins, timing and impact. Antiquity, 85, 583–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongo, H., Ishiguro, N., Watanobe, T., Shigehara, N., Anezaki, T., Long, V. T., et al. (2002). Variation in mitochondrial DNA of Vietnamese pigs: Relationships with Asian domestic pigs and Ryukyu wild boars. Zoological Science 19, 1329–1335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudak, T. J. (2008). William J. Gedney’s comparative Tai source book. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H. C., Carson, M. T., Peter Bellwood, F. Z., Campos, P. J., Piper, E., Dizon, M. J. L. A., et al. (2011). The first settlement of Remote Oceania: The Philippines to the Marianas. Antiquity, 85(329), 909–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennerknecht, I., Hämmerle, J. M., Blench, R. M. (2012). The peopling of Nias, from the perspective of oral literature and molecular genetic data. In D. Bonatz, A. Reinecke, & M. L. Tjoa-Bonatz (Eds.), Crossing borders: Selected papers from the 13th international conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian archaeologists (vol. 1, pp. 3–15). Singapore: NUS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuang Ti, L. (2000). Change and stability in the dietary system of prehistoric O-Luan-Pi inhabitants in southern Taiwan. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 20, 159–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H., Paz, V., Lara, M., Barton, H. J., Piper, P., Ochoa, J., et al. (2008). Terminal Pleistocene to mid-Holocene occupation and an early cremation burial at Ille Cave, Palawan, Philippines. Antiquity, 82, 318–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F.-K. (1977). A handbook of comparative Tai. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication #15. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matisoff, J. A. (2003). Handbook of proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConvell, P., & Evans, N. (1998). The enigma of Pama-Nyungan expansion in Australia. In R. M. Blench & M. Spriggs (Eds.), Archaeology and language II (pp. 174–191). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederer, B. (1998). Les langues Hmong–Mjen (Miáo–Yáo)—Phonologie Historique. Lincom Studies in Asian Linguistics. 07. München: Lincom Europa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederer, B. (2004). Pa-hng and the classification of the Hmong-Mien languages. In N. Tapp, J. Michaud, C. Culas, & G. Yai Lee (Eds.), Hmong/Miao in Asia (pp. 129–146). Bangkok: Silkworm Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norquest, P. K. (2007). A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Hlai. Ph.D dissertation, Department Of Anthropology, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostapirat, W. (2000). Proto-Kra. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 23(1), 1–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostapirat, W. (2005). Kra-Dai and Austronesian: Notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution. In L. Sagart, R. Blench, & A. Sanchez-Mazas (Eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics (pp. 107–131). London: Routledge Curzon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, R. (1991). A guide to austroasiatic speakers and their languages. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications No. 23. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff, M. (2010). Hmong-Mien language history. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, L. A. (1994). Possible non-Austronesian lexical elements in Philippine Negrito languages. Oceanic Linguistics, 33, 37–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, L. A. (2005). The current status of Austric. In L. Sagart, R. Blench, & A. Sanchez-Mazas (Eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics (pp. 132–160). London: Routledge Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rispoli, F. (2008). The incised and impressed pottery of Mainland Southeast Asia: Following the paths of Neolithization. East and West, 57, 235–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagart, L. (2005a). Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: An updated and improved argument. In L. Sagart, R. Blench, & A. Sanchez-Mazas (Eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics (pp. 161–176). London: Routledge Curzon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sagart, L. (2005b). Tai-Kadai as a subgroup of Austronesian. In L. Sagart, R. Blench, & A. Sanchez-Mazas (Eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics (pp. 177–181). London: Routledge Curzon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, G. (1901). Review of Frankfurter’s Siamese grammar. T’oung Pao, 2, 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, R. (1966/1967). Introduction to Sino-Tibetan (Part I: 1966, Part II: 1967). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorto, H. L. (2006). A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary. In P. Sidwell, D. Cooper, & C. Bauer (Eds.), PL 579. Canberra: ANU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidwell, P., & Blench, R. M. (2011). The Austroasiatic Urheimat: The Southeastern riverine hypothesis. In N. Enfield (Ed.), Dynamics of human diversity in Mainland SE Asia (pp. 317–345). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeat, W., & Blagden, C. O. (1906). Pagan races of the Malay Peninsular. London: MacMillian & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solheim II, W.G. (1984–5). The Nusantao hypothesis: The origin and spread of Austronesian speakers. Asian perspectives 26(1), 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spriggs, M. T. J. (2011). Archaeology and the Austronesian expansion: Where are we now? Antiquity, 85, 10–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starosta, S. (2005). Proto-East-Asian and the origin and dispersal of languages of East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific. In L. Sagart, R. Blench, & A. Sanchez-Mazas (Eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics (pp. 182–197). London: Routledge Curzon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thongkum, T. L. (2001). The Tai-Kadai peoples of Hainan island and their languages. In M. R. Kalaya Tingsabach, & A. S. Abramson (Eds.), Essays in Tai linguistics (pp. 189–203). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurgood, G., & LaPolla, R. J. (Eds.). (2003). The Sino-Tibetan languages. Routledge Language Family Series. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driem, G. L. (1997). Sino-Bodic. Bulletin of the school of oriental and Southeast Asian Studies, 60(3), 455–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driem, G. L. (1998). Neolithic correlates of ancient Tibeto-Burman migrations. In R. M. Blench & M. Spriggs (Eds.), Archaeology and Language II (pp. 67–102). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driem, G. L. (2008). To which language family does Chinese belong, or what’s in a name. In A. Sanchez-Mazas, R. Blench, M. D. Ross, I. Peiros, & M. Lin (Eds.), Past Human Migrations in East Asia: Matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics. (pp. 219–253). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Barton, H. J., Wan, Z., Li, Q., Ma, Z., Li, M., et al. (2013). Sago-Type palms were an important plant food prior to rice in Southern subtropical China. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e63148. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zide, N., & Pandya, V. (1989). A bibliographical introduction to Andamanese linguistics. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 109(4), 639–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cambridge, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, UK

    Roger M Blench

Authors
  1. Roger M Blench
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger M Blench .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA

    Junko Habu

  2. Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

    Peter V. Lape

  3. School of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

    John W. Olsen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blench, R.M. (2017). Origins of Ethnolinguistic Identity in Southeast Asia . In: Habu, J., Lape, P., Olsen, J. (eds) Handbook of East and Southeast Asian Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6521-2_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6521-2_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6519-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6521-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation