Advertisement

Historical Aerial Photography for Landscape Analysis

  • Jessica L. Morgan
  • Sarah E. GergelEmail author
  • Collin Ankerson
  • Stephanie A. Tomscha
  • Ira J. Sutherland
Chapter

Abstract

Historic patterns and spatial heterogeneity of past landscapes can greatly influence dynamics of contemporary landscapes. Historical conditions lay the foundation for contemporary management options and can help guide restoration goals. While historical spatial data sources are not extremely common, historical aerial photography is among the longest available, spatially contiguous record of landscape change. Aerial photography has been routinely collected since the 1930s in many parts of the world and has aided land management for over 75 years. Aerial photography often forms the basis of a variety of maps routinely used by managers, including forest ecosystem inventories and digital elevation models (or DEMs). Aerial photographs generally provide higher spatial resolution information than widely available (and free) satellite imagery (e.g., Landsat). Thus, aerial photographs have important and unique value for mapping historical landscape baselines and assessing long-term landscape change. For these reasons, understanding how information is derived from aerial photography is enormously important for landscape ecologists. The objectives of this lab are to help students.

Keywords

Aerial Photograph Tree Height Geometric Error Aerial Photography Digital Elevation Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References and Recommended Readings1

  1. Avery TA, Berlin GL (1992) Fundamentals of remote sensing and air photo interpretation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaschke T (2004) Object-based contextual image classification built on image segmentation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, pp 113–119Google Scholar
  3. Cohen WB, Kushla JD, Ripple WJ, Garman SL (1996) An introduction to digital methods in remote sensing of forested ecosystems: focus on the Pacific Northwest, USA. Environ Manag 20:421–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fensham RJ, Fairfax RJ (2002) Aerial photography for assessing vegetation change: a review of applications and the relevance of findings for Australian vegetation history. Aust J Bot 50:415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fox TJ, Knutson MG, Hines RK (2000) Mapping forest canopy gaps using air-photo interpretation and ground surveys. Wildl Soc Bull 28:882–889Google Scholar
  6. *Gergel SE, Stange Y, Coops NC, Johansen K, Kirby KR (2007). What is the value of a good map? An example using high spatial resolution imagery to aid riparian restoration. Ecosystems 10:688–702. Introduces user-friendly ways to assess map accuracy in a restoration context, converting map accuracy to potential restoration expenditures. A clear demonstration of the ecological and economic value of high spatial resolution imagery. Google Scholar
  7. Getzin S, Nuske RS, Wiegan K (2014) Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to quantify spatial gap patterns in forests. Remote Sens 6:6988–7004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hay GJ, Blaschke T, Marceau DJ, Bouchard A (2003) A comparison of three image-object methods for the multiscale analysis of landscape structure. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 57:327–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hudak AT, Wessman CA (1998) Textural analysis of historical aerial photographs to characterize woody plant encroachment in South African Savanna. Remote Sens Environ 66:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huston MA (1999) Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals. Oikos 86:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. *Jackson MM, Topp E, Gergel SE, Martin K, Pirotti F, Sitzia T (2016) Expansion of subalpine woody vegetation over 40 years on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Canad J Forest Res 46:437–443. An example of how historical photography can be used to assess changes in alpine montane communities within the context of changing climate. Google Scholar
  12. Jensen JR (2000) Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  13. Laliberte AS, Rango A, Havstad KM, Paris JF, Beck RF, McNeely R, Gonzalez AL (2004) Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico. Remote Sens Environ 93:198–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Landres PB, Morgan P, Swanson FJ (1999) Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecol Appl 9:1179–1188Google Scholar
  15. *Li H, Reynolds JF (1995) On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73:280–284. An enduring classic on ways to think about and quantify landscape heterogeneity—a refreshing read for advanced students after students wrestle with the vagaries of photo-interpretation and how these heterogeneity ideas might translate to aerial photography and other image data sources. Google Scholar
  16. Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2004) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Mast JN, Veblen TT, Hodgson ME (1997) Tree invasion within a pine/grassland ecotone: an approach with historic aerial photograph and GIS modeling. For Ecol Manage 93:181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. *Morgan JL, Gergel SE, Coops NC (2010) Aerial photography: a rapidly evolving tool for ecological management. BioScience 60:47–59. A user-friendly introduction to aerial photography, especially useful for novice readers less familiar with the technical specifications and terminology used in the literature. Google Scholar
  19. *Morgan JL, Gergel SE (2013) Automated analysis of aerial photographs and potential for historic forest mapping. Canad J Forest Res 43:699–710. An overview of the utility of historical photography and ways to compare manual and automated image classification techniques with implications for assessing landscape pattern. This reading pairs well with the advanced optional exercises available on the book website. Google Scholar
  20. Morgan JL, Gergel SE (2010) Quantifying landscape heterogeneity from historic aerial photographs using object-based analysis. Landsc Ecol 25:985–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. *Nyssen J et al (2016) Recovery of the aerial photographs of Ethiopia in the 1930s. J Cult Herit 17:170–178. Great example of the global utility of aerial photography for assessing landscape change along with explanation of the sometimes painstaking process of building an archive. In some cases, occupying countries are the source of information for historical imagery, so understanding the military history of a region can help in locating sources of previously unknown and under-utilized imagery. Google Scholar
  22. Paine DP, Kiser JD (2003) Aerial photography and image interpretation, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  23. Province of British Columbia (2002) Vegetation Resources Inventory: Photo interpretation process. Terrestrial Information Branch, Resources Inventory Committee, Victoria, B.C.Google Scholar
  24. Swetnam TW, Allen CD, Betancourt JL (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecol Appl 9:1189–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. *Thompson ID, Maher SC, Rouillard DP, Fryxell JM, Baker JA (2007) Accuracy of forest inventory mapping: some implications for boreal forest management. Forest Ecol Manag 252:208–221. A very readable exploration of practical issues in using aerial photography for forest inventories. Yields some surprising results with implications for management and research. Google Scholar
  26. Thompson SD, Gergel SE (2008) Conservation implications of mapping rare habitats using high spatial resolution imagery: Recommendations for heterogeneous and fragmented landscapes Landscape Ecology 23(9):1023–1037Google Scholar
  27. Tomlinson MJ, Gergel SE, Beechie TJ, McClure MM (2011) Long-term changes in river-floodplain dynamics: implications for salmonid habitat in the Interior Columbia Basin, USA. Ecol Appl 21(5):1643–1658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. *Tomscha SA, Gergel SE (2016) Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies misunderstood without landscape history. Ecol Soc 21(1):43. Using maps of ecosystem services derived from aerial photography, this work demonstrates the value of historical information in understanding landscapes. This reading also sets up the reader well for Chapters 16 or 19 this book. Google Scholar
  29. Tuominen S, Pekkarinen A (2005) Performance of different spectral and textural aerial photograph features in multi-source forest inventory. Remote Sens Environ 94:256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turner W (2014) Sensing biodiversity. Science 346(6207):301–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wolf PR, Dewitt BA (2000) Elements of photogrammetry with applications in GIS. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Wulder MA (1998) Optical remote sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Progr Phys Geogr 22:449–476Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica L. Morgan
    • 1
  • Sarah E. Gergel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Collin Ankerson
    • 1
  • Stephanie A. Tomscha
    • 1
  • Ira J. Sutherland
    • 1
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations