Linking Landscapes and Metacommunities



Landscape ecology is the study of interactions between spatial landscape patterns and ecological processes, typically examining real landscapes at broad spatial scales. Metacommunity ecology focuses more specifically on how spatial processes alter species interactions and typically involves a localized spatial extent and more abstracted spatial landscapes (Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations, San Diego, 45–69, 2004). These disciplines have evolved somewhat independently, despite a shared interest in how organisms respond to and interact with spatial phenomena. In this chapter, we combine perspectives from both disciplines using a suite of multivariate spatial statistical techniques designed to help understand the relative importance of abiotic factors (such as climatic gradients, geologic features, and resource availability) and biotic factors (such as predator territoriality and seed dispersal) in determining the abundances of species in communities. To illustrate these techniques, we use a well-known dataset of tropical trees. This lab will enable students to.


Mineralizable Nitrogen Intraspecific Competition Broad Spatial Scale Barro Colorado Island Species Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References and Recommended Readings1

  1. Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D (2008) Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89:2623–2632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolker BM (2004) Continuous-space models for population dynamics. In: Hanski I, Gaggioti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier Science, San Diego, pp 45–69, Chapter 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. *Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055. A classic paper outlining some of the approaches covered in this lab in more detail. Google Scholar
  4. *Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R. Springer, New York. A useful reference for a variety of analyses in R. Google Scholar
  5. Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2006) Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model 196:483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fortin M-J, Dale MRT (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert B, Bennett JR (2010) Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up? J Appl Ecol 47:1071–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanski I (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol J Linn Soc 42:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jongman RHG, Ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. *Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Chapters 1, 3 and 5 provide an excellent, readable introduction into basic ordination techniques. Google Scholar
  13. Levins R (1970) Extinction. In: Gesternhaber M (ed) Some mathematical problems in biology. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, pp 77–107Google Scholar
  14. Macarthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  15. Muller-Landau HC, Wright J, Calderon O, Condit RS, Hubbell SP (2008) Interspecific variation in primary seed dispersal in a tropical forest. J Ecol 96:653–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P (2010) Estimating and controlling for spatial structure in the study of ecological communities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations