Noise Mitigation During Pile Driving Efficiently Reduces Disturbance of Marine Mammals

  • Georg Nehls
  • Armin Rose
  • Ansgar Diederichs
  • Michael Bellmann
  • Hendrik Pehlke
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 875)

Abstract

Acoustic monitoring of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena L., 1758) indicated a strongly reduced disturbance by noise emitted by pile driving for offshore wind turbine foundations insulated by a big bubble curtain (BBC). This newly developed noise mitigation system was tested during construction of the offshore wind farm Borkum West II (North Sea). Because porpoise activity strongly corresponded to the sound level, operation of the new system under its most suitable configuration reduced the porpoise disturbance area by ~90%. Hence, for the first time, a positive effect of a noise mitigation system during offshore pile driving on an affected marine mammal species could be demonstrated.

Keywords

Big bubble curtain Sound exposure level Noise pollution Offshore wind farm Harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena 

References

  1. Brandt M, Diederichs A, Betke K, Nehls G (2011) Responses of harbour porpoises to pile driving at the Horns Rev II offshore wind farm in the Danish North Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 421: 205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (2013) Quieting technologies for reducing noise during seismic surveying and pile driving. Information synthesis. Report prepared by CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc., under Contract M12PC00008 for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, US Department of the Interior. https://www.infinityconferences.com/InfiniBase/Templates/183779/Information_Synthesis.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013
  3. Dähne M, Gilles A, Lucke K, Peschko V, Adler S, Krügel K, Sundermeyer J, Siebert U (2013) Effects of pile-driving on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) at the first offshore wind farm in Germany. Environ Res Lett 8:025002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Commission (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Report 01992L0043-20070101, EC Habitats Directive. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1992L0043:20070101:EN:PDF
  5. German Federal Environment Agency (2011) Recommendation of noise levels in the construction of offshore wind turbines (OWT). German Federal Environment Agency, Berlin. http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/4118.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013
  6. German Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (2010) Guidelines for the application of the overriding control within the exclusive economic zone and on the continental shelf within the scope of § 58 paragraph 1 sentence 2 of the Federal Nature Conservation Act. http://www.bsh.de/de/Meeresnutzung/Wirtschaft/Windparks/Grundlagen/Leitsaetze_Eingriffsregelung.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013
  7. Gilles A, Scheidat M, Siebert U (2009) Seasonal distribution of harbour porpoises and possible interference of offshore wind farms in the German North Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 383:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griessmann T, Rustemeier J, Betke K, Gabriel J, Neumann T, Nehls G, Brandt M, Diederichs A, Bachmann J (2010) Research and application of sound mitigation measures during pile driving of FINO3 monopiles. Project Schall FINO3, Reference No. FKZ 0325023A/0325077, Final Report of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU)Google Scholar
  9. Illingworth RR, Rodkin RB (2007) Compendium of pile driving sound data. Report prepared for the California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/bio/files/pile_driving_snd_comp9_27_07.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013
  10. Koschinski S, Lüdemann K (2011) Development of noise mitigation measures in offshore wind farm construction. Report prepared for the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. http://www.bfn.de/habitatmare/de/downloads/berichte/BfN-Studie_Bauschallminderung_Juli-2011.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013
  11. Mann J, Teilmann J (2013) Environmental impact of wind energy. Environ Res Lett 8:035001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nehls G, Betke K, Eckelmann S, Ros M (2007) Assessment and costs of potential engineering solutions for the mitigation of the impacts of underwater noise arising from the construction of offshore windfarms. Report prepared by BioConsult SH, Husum, Germany, for Collaborative Offshore Wind Research Into the Environment (COWRIE) Ltd. http://www.offshorewindfarms.co.uk/Assets/COWRIE-ENGFinal270907.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2008
  13. Pehlke H, Nehls G, Bellmann M, Gerke P, Diederichs A, Oldeland J, Grunau C, Witte S, Rose A (2013) Big bubble curtain – summary of the results of the project Borkum West II. Project HYDROSCHALL-OFF BWII, Reference No. FKZ 0325309A/B/C, report prepared by BioConsult SH, Husum, Germany, for the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. http://www.bioconsult-sh.de/pdf/BWII_ENDVERSION_20130624_final_2-1.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013
  14. Rustemeier J, Griessmann T, Betke K, Gabriel J, Neumann T, Küchenmeister M (2012a) Collaborative project: exploring the sound reduction measure “tiered bubble curtain (little bubble curtain)” in the alpha ventus. Project Schall alpha ventus, Reference No. FKZ 0325122A and 0325122B, final report of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) project “Sound alpha ventus” funded by the BMU, Hannover, Germany and prepared by the Institute of Statics and Dynamics for the BMU. http://www.isd.uni-hannover.de/fileadmin/institut/literatur/FKZ0325122-SchallAV.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013
  15. Rustemeier J, Neuber M, Griessmann T, Ewaldt A, Uhl A, Schultz-von Glahn M, Betke K, Matuschek R, Lübben A (2012b) Design, test, implementation and verification of low-noise construction methods and mitigation measures in the establishment of offshore wind turbines. Project Schall03, Reference No. FKZ 0327645, final report of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) project “Sound 3” funded by the BMU and prepared by the Institute of Statics and Dynamics for the BMU. http://www.isd.uni-hannover.de/fileadmin/institut/literatur/FKZ0327645-Schall3.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013
  16. Spence J, Dreyer H (2012) The design, predictive performance modeling and field testing of underwater sound attenuation systems: a review of two case studies. In: Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Institute of Acoustics 2012: 11th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics (ECUA 2012), Edinburgh, UK, 2–6 July 2012, 17:070004. http://scitation.aip.org/getpdf/servlet/GetPDFServlet?filetype=pdf&id=PMARCW000017000001070004000001&idtype=cvips&doi=10.1121/1.4764504%26prog=normal. Accessed 11 July 2013
  17. Stokes A, Cockrell K, Wilson J, Davis D, Warwick D (2010) Mitigation of underwater pile driving noise during offshore construction: final report prepared by applied physical sciences under contract M09PC00019-8 for the Minerals Management Service, Department of the Interior. http://www.bsee.gov/uploadedFiles/BSEE/Research_and_Training/Technology_Assessment_and_Research/M09PC00019-8PileDrivingFinalRpt.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2013
  18. Wilke F, Kloske K, Bellmann M (2012) EZRA: evaluation of systems for Rammschallminderung in an offshore test pile. Report 1749-11-a-bel for Project ESRa, Reference No. FKZ 0325307, prepared by the Institute of Technical and Applied Physics GmBH (itap) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU)
  19. Würsig B, Greene CR Jr, Jefferson TA (2000) Development of an air bubble curtain to reduce underwater noise of percussive piling. Mar Environ Res 49:79–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg Nehls
    • 1
  • Armin Rose
    • 1
  • Ansgar Diederichs
    • 1
  • Michael Bellmann
    • 2
  • Hendrik Pehlke
    • 1
  1. 1.BioConsult SH GmbH & Co.KGHusumGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Technical and Applied Physics GmbH (itap)OldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations