Skip to main content

Expert Elicitation Methods in Quantifying the Consequences of Acoustic Disturbance from Offshore Renewable Energy Developments

  • Conference paper

Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB,volume 875)


There are many developments for offshore renewable energy around the United Kingdom whose installation typically produces large amounts of far-reaching noise, potentially disturbing many marine mammals. The potential to affect the favorable conservation status of many species means extensive environmental impact assessment requirements for the licensing of such installation activities. Quantification of such complex risk problems is difficult and much of the key information is not readily available. Expert elicitation methods can be employed in such pressing cases. We describe the methodology used in an expert elicitation study conducted in the United Kingdom for combining expert opinions based on statistical distributions and copula-like methods.


  • Expert elicitation
  • Renewable energy
  • Noise

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD   429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions


  • Albert I, Donnet S, Guihenneuc-Jouyaux C, Low-Choy S, Mengersen K, Rousseau J (2012) Combining expert opinions in prior elicitation. Bayesian Anal 7:503–532

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Garthwaite PH, Kadane JB, O’Hagan A (2005) Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 100:680–701. doi:10.1198/016214505000000105

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, MacKay J (1986) The joy of copulas: bivariate distributions with uniform marginals. Am Stat 40:280–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Zidek JV (1986) Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography. Statistics 1:114–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. Chapman & Hall Ltd., New York

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Iman RL, Conover WJ (1982) A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Commun Stat–Simulat Comput 11:311–334

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jouini M, Clemen RT (1996) Copula models for aggregating expert opinions. Oper Res 44:444–457

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan DC, Marshall K (2006) The Delphi process – an expert-based approach to ecological modelling in data-poor environments. Anim Conserv 9:11–19

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martin TG, Burgman MA, Fidler F, Kuhnert PM, Low-Choy S, McBride M, Mengersen K (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv Biol 26:29–38

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2005) Marine mammal populations and ocean noise: determining when noise causes biologically significant effects. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Development Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at

  • Schweizer B (1991) Thirty years of copulas. In: Dall’Aglio G, Kotz S, Salinetti G (eds) Advances in probability distributions with given marginals. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 13–50

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ Inst Statist Univ Paris 8:229–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Southall BL, Bowles AE, Ellison WT, Finneran JJ, Gentry RL, Greene CR Jr, Kastak D, Ketten DR, Miller JH, Nachtigall PE, Richardson WJ, Thomas JA, Tyack PL (2007) Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Aquat Mamm 33:411–521

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Speirs-Bridge A, Fidler F, McBride M, Flander L, Cumming G, Burgman M (2010) Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts. Risk Anal 30:512–523. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01337.x

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Donovan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Donovan, C., Harwood, J., King, S., Booth, C., Caneco, B., Walker, C. (2016). Expert Elicitation Methods in Quantifying the Consequences of Acoustic Disturbance from Offshore Renewable Energy Developments. In: Popper, A., Hawkins, A. (eds) The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 875. Springer, New York, NY.

Download citation