Expert Elicitation Methods in Quantifying the Consequences of Acoustic Disturbance from Offshore Renewable Energy Developments

  • Carl Donovan
  • John Harwood
  • Stephanie King
  • Cormac Booth
  • Bruno Caneco
  • Cameron Walker
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 875)

Abstract

There are many developments for offshore renewable energy around the United Kingdom whose installation typically produces large amounts of far-reaching noise, potentially disturbing many marine mammals. The potential to affect the favorable conservation status of many species means extensive environmental impact assessment requirements for the licensing of such installation activities. Quantification of such complex risk problems is difficult and much of the key information is not readily available. Expert elicitation methods can be employed in such pressing cases. We describe the methodology used in an expert elicitation study conducted in the United Kingdom for combining expert opinions based on statistical distributions and copula-like methods.

Keywords

Expert elicitation Renewable energy Noise 

References

  1. Albert I, Donnet S, Guihenneuc-Jouyaux C, Low-Choy S, Mengersen K, Rousseau J (2012) Combining expert opinions in prior elicitation. Bayesian Anal 7:503–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garthwaite PH, Kadane JB, O’Hagan A (2005) Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 100:680–701. doi:10.1198/016214505000000105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Genest C, MacKay J (1986) The joy of copulas: bivariate distributions with uniform marginals. Am Stat 40:280–283Google Scholar
  4. Genest C, Zidek JV (1986) Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography. Statistics 1:114–135Google Scholar
  5. Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. Chapman & Hall Ltd., New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iman RL, Conover WJ (1982) A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Commun Stat–Simulat Comput 11:311–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jouini M, Clemen RT (1996) Copula models for aggregating expert opinions. Oper Res 44:444–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. MacMillan DC, Marshall K (2006) The Delphi process – an expert-based approach to ecological modelling in data-poor environments. Anim Conserv 9:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin TG, Burgman MA, Fidler F, Kuhnert PM, Low-Choy S, McBride M, Mengersen K (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv Biol 26:29–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. National Research Council (2005) Marine mammal populations and ocean noise: determining when noise causes biologically significant effects. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. R Core Development Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at http://www.R-project.org/
  12. Schweizer B (1991) Thirty years of copulas. In: Dall’Aglio G, Kotz S, Salinetti G (eds) Advances in probability distributions with given marginals. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 13–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ Inst Statist Univ Paris 8:229–231Google Scholar
  14. Southall BL, Bowles AE, Ellison WT, Finneran JJ, Gentry RL, Greene CR Jr, Kastak D, Ketten DR, Miller JH, Nachtigall PE, Richardson WJ, Thomas JA, Tyack PL (2007) Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Aquat Mamm 33:411–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Speirs-Bridge A, Fidler F, McBride M, Flander L, Cumming G, Burgman M (2010) Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts. Risk Anal 30:512–523. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01337.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl Donovan
    • 1
  • John Harwood
    • 1
  • Stephanie King
    • 2
  • Cormac Booth
    • 2
  • Bruno Caneco
    • 3
  • Cameron Walker
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling (CREEM), The Observatory, University of St. AndrewsSt. Andrews, FifeUK
  2. 2.Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) Marine, University of St. AndrewsSt. AndrewsUK
  3. 3.DMP Statistical Solutions UK Ltd.St. AndrewsUK
  4. 4.Department of Engineering ScienceUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations