Advertisement

Challenge of Using Passive Acoustic Monitoring in High-Energy Environments: UK Tidal Environments and Other Case Studies

  • Cormac G. Booth
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 875)

Abstract

The use of passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) around marine developments is commonplace. A buffer-based PAM system (e.g., C-POD) is a cost-effective method for assessing cetacean acoustic presence. Devices have been deployed by Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) Marine around the United Kingdom, allowing an examination of the performance of C-PODs with respect to background noise, tilt angle, and environmental factors. C-PODs were found to often only monitor for a few seconds of each minute, resulting in significant loss of monitoring time. Issues were likely driven by environmental and deployment factors. The practical limitations of buffer-based PAM systems in high-energy/noisy environments are indicated here.

Keywords

Impact monitoring Noisy environments Marine mammals Limitations Passive acoustic monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to those who contributed reviewer comments in the preparation of this manuscript and those who made data available.

References

  1. Akamatsu T, Teilmann J, Miller LA, Tougaard J, Dietz R, Wang D, Wang KX, Siebert U, Naito Y (2007) Comparison of echolocation behavior between coastal and riverine porpoises. Deep-Sea Res Pt II 54:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey H, Corkrey R, Cheney B, Thompson PM (2013) Analyzing temporally correlated dolphins sighting data using generalized estimating equations. Mar Mamm Sci 29:123–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth CG, Embling C, Gordon J, Calderan SV, Hammond PS (2013) Habitat preferences and distribution of the harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena west of Scotland. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 478:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt MJ, Diederichs A, Betke K, Nehls G (2011) Responses of harbour porpoises to pile driving at the Horns Rev II offshore wind farm in the Danish North Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 421:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlström J, Berggren P, Tregenza NJC (2009) Spatial and temporal impact of pingers on porpoises. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chelonia (2013) C-POD.exe: a guide for users. Available at http://www.chelonia.co.uk/downloads/CPOD.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2013
  7. Dähne M, Gilles A, Lucke K, Peschko V, Adler S, Krügel K, Sundermeyer J, Siebert U (2013) Effects of pile-driving on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) at the first offshore wind farm in Germany. Environ Res Lett 8:025002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hammond PS, Berggren P, Benke H, Borchers DL, Collet A, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Heimlich S, Hiby AR, Leopold MF, Øien N (2002) Abundance of harbour porpoises and other cetaceans in the North Sea and adjacent waters. J Appl Ecol 39:361–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Panigada S, Zanardelli M, MacKenzie M, Donovan C, Melin F, Hammond PS (2008) Modelling habitat preferences for fin whales and striped dolphins in the Pelagos Sanctuary (Western Mediterranean Sea) with physiographic and remote sensing variables. Remote Sens Environ 112:3400–3412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pirotta E, Matthiopoulos J, MacKenzie M, Scott-Hayward L, Rendell L (2011) Modelling sperm whales habitat preference: a novel approach combining transect and follow data. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 436:257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R Core Development Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at www.R-project.org
  12. Todd VLG, Pearse WD, Tregenza NJC, Lepper PA, Todd IB (2009) Diel echolocation activity of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) around North Sea offshore gas installations. ICES J Mar Sci 66:734–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Verboom WC, Kastelein RA (1997) Structure of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) click train signals. In: Read AJ, Wiepkema PR, Nachtigall PE (eds) The biology of the harbour porpoise. De Spil Publishers, Woerden, pp 343–363Google Scholar
  14. Zimmer WMX (2011) Passive acoustic monitoring of cetaceans. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) Marine Ltd., New Technology CentreSt. Andrews, FifeUK

Personalised recommendations