Advertisement

Are the 1/3-Octave Band 63- and 125-Hz Noise Levels Predictive of Vessel Activity? The Case in the Cres–Lošinj Archipelago (Northern Adriatic Sea, Croatia)

  • Marta PicciulinEmail author
  • Linda Sebastianutto
  • Caterina Maria Fortuna
  • Peter Mackelworth
  • Draško Holcer
  • Nikolina Rako Gospić
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 875)

Abstract

A 3-years sea ambient-noise (SAN) monitoring was carried out in the Cres–Lošinj Archipelago (Croatia), where a bottlenose dolphin population is threatened by unregulated nautical tourism. A total of 540 5-min SAN samples were collected and analyzed in an Indicator 11.2.1 (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) perspective. The 1/3-octave band center frequencies of 63 and 125 Hz (re 1 μPa.rms) proved to be predictive of local predominant ship type over time. However, the noisiest band level was centered on 200 Hz. We therefore suggest measuring a wider frequency band than those requested in Indicator 11.2.1.

Keywords

Noise Boat Dolphins 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Marta Bolgan for valuable comments on the present manuscript.

References

  1. Andrew RK, Howe BM, Mercer JA, Dzieciuch MA (2002) Ocean ambient sound: comparing the 1960s with the 1990s for a receiver off the California coast. Acoust Res Lett Online 3:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arko-Pijevac M, Benac Ĉ, Kovaĉić M, Kirinĉić M, Grţanĉić T (2003) Ecological and geological valorisation of the coastal line and submarine area of the islands Ćutin mail and Ćutin veli aiming to establish a protected area. In: Besendorfer V (ed) Zbornik saţetaka priopćenja Osmog hrvatskog biološkog kongresa. Hrvatsko biološko društvo, Zagreb, pp 407–408Google Scholar
  3. Bearzi G, Notarbartolo di Sciara G, Politi E (1997) Social ecology of bottlenose dolphins in the Kvarnerić (Northern Adriatic Sea). Mar Mamm Sci 13:650–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Commission (2008) Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008, establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Source L164:19–40Google Scholar
  5. Favro S, Saganić I (2007) Natural characteristics of Croatian littoral area as a comparative advantage for nautical tourism development. Geoadria 12:59–81Google Scholar
  6. Fortuna CM (2006) Ecology and conservation of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in the north-eastern Adriatic Sea. Ph.D. thesis, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, FifeGoogle Scholar
  7. Hildebrand JA (2009) Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 395:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mikačić V (1994) Otočni turizam Hrvatske/Island tourism in Croatian. Društvena istraživanja 3:517–529Piercy JJB, Codling EA, Hill A, Smith DJ, Simpson SD (2014) Habitat quality affects sound production and likely distance of detection on coral reefs. Marine Ecol Prog Ser 516:35–47Google Scholar
  9. Rako N, Fortuna CM, Holcer D, Mackelworth P, Nimak-Wood M, Pleslić G, Sebastianutto L, Vilibić I, Wiemann A, Picciulin M (2013) Leisure boating noise as a trigger for the displacement of the bottlenose dolphins of the Cres-Lošinj archipelago (northern Adriatic Sea, Croatia). Mar Pollut Bull 68:77–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rako N, Picciulin M, Vilibić I, Fortuna CM (2012) Spatial and temporal variability of sea ambient noise as an anthropogenic pressure index: The case of the Cres-Lošinj archipelago, Croatia. J Mar Biol Assoc 93:27–36. doi: 10.1017/S0025315412001233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Richardson WJ, Green CR Jr, Malme CI, Thompson DH (1995) Marine mammals and noise. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  12. Ross D (2005) Ship sources of ambient noise. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 30:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Slabbekoorn H, Bouton N, van Opzeeland I, Coers A, ten Cate C, Popper AN (2010) A noisy spring: The impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends Ecol Evol 25:419–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tyack PL (2008) Implication for marine mammals of large-scale changes in the marine acoustic environment. J Mammal 89:549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. van der Graaf AJ, Ainslie MA, André M, Brensing K, Dalen J, Dekeling RPA, Robinson S, Tasker ML, Thomsen F, Werner S (2012) European Marine Strategy Framework Directive Good Environmental Status (MSFD-GES). Report of the Technical Subgroup on Underwater Noise and other forms of energy, 27 Feb 2012Google Scholar
  16. van der Sluijs I, Gray SM, Amorim MCP, Barber I, Candolin U, Hendry AP, Krahe R, Maan ME, Utne-Palm AC, Wagner HJ, Wong BBM (2011) Communication in troubled waters: responses of fish communication systems to changing environments. Evol Ecol 25:623–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Picciulin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Linda Sebastianutto
    • 1
  • Caterina Maria Fortuna
    • 2
  • Peter Mackelworth
    • 1
  • Draško Holcer
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nikolina Rako Gospić
    • 1
  1. 1.Blue World Institute of Marine Research and ConservationVeli LošinjCroatia
  2. 2.Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and ResearchRomeItaly
  3. 3.Croatian Natural History MuseumZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations