Skip to main content

Realizing Global Health: Effective Health Systems

  • Chapter
Improving Aid Effectiveness in Global Health

Abstract

How must global health work to make sure that everyone has access to quality healthcare everywhere every day with almost 200 countries, the UN and its global health organizations such as WHO, UNICEF, UNDP, UNFPA and hundreds of private donors such as the Gates and Clinton Foundations, multilateral and bilateral donors such as the US Government through its agencies, and other governments, including the new BRICKS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, Korea, and South Africa)? The answer is not easy but it is simple. Our world has a very complex and fragmented global health architecture that is not well-understood, defined, or coordinated yet and that must be solved now. In Chap. 1, you learned about human rights, the Millennium Declaration, and the principles of the Paris Declaration. In Chap. 2, you learned about the slow progress in the first 5 years right after the Millennium Declaration and the targets that have not been met by 2015 in spite of the important achievements and best practices demonstrated in global health, medicine, and public health knowledge that can save millions of lives. In Chap. 2, you also realized the complexity of the global health field, the fierce competition for funding, and the fragmentation in approaches and efforts that have made the effective transfer of new medical knowledge and best practices that actually strengthen health systems and programs very limited in scale. Instead of having clear and measurable performance standards and tangible and measurable progress being achieved consistently by a design that makes use of the knowledge and technology available, we have a puzzle of projects, organizations, and initiatives that confuses even those that have created them. In addition, you also know that the sustainability of the results of many projects and initiatives is not part of most projects’ design and it is not measured or evaluated consistently, and therefore, the degree of sustainability achieved is unknown, thus rendering many projects, programs, and organizations ineffective to deliver lasting change or significantly improve global health outcomes. This chapter will show you what you can and must do to break the ineffectiveness cycle and simplify the global health field you can influence, so you know where you and your project or organization fit and how you can make a bigger and more effective impact. This chapter lays out simple, though not easy, guidelines to not only improve the effectiveness of global health projects and initiatives, but also shows how to create an effective aid framework in global health, so we are clear about what we practice and can confidently advance the field of global health. I will also make practical recommendations for the next 15 years of global health practice to be effective and achieve the 2030 sustainable development health targets and help fulfill the right to health of everyone everywhere every day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • A Guide for Fostering Change to Scale Up Effective Health Services. (2007). Implementing Best Practices in Reproductive Health, 1, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Accra Agenda for Action. (2008). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. (2011). Lean six sigma for hospitals: Simple steps to fast, affordable, and flawless healthcare. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beracochea, E. (2013). Health for All NOW (2nd ed.). Fairfax, VA: MIDEGO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capacity Development and Country Ownership: Thinking Globally, Leading Locally. (2014). USAID, 1, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration of Alma Ata. (1978). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Direct Sales Agent Models in Health. (2013). USAID, 1, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Final Evaluation of the Community-Based Therapeutic Care Institutionalization. (n.d.). USAID.gov. Retrieved September 1, 2014, from http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pdacy084.pdf

  • Fleischman, J., & Kramer, A. (2013). A trip report of the CSIS delegation to Zambia. Strengthening U.S. Investments in Women’s Global Health, 1, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, A. (2013, July 29). Annals of medicine, slow ideas. The New Yorker, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor, C. (2006). Paris Declaration commitments and implications for gender equality and women’s empowerment. 1, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzlinger, R. E. (2012). Let’s put consumers in charge of health care. Harvard Business Review, 1, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J., Glassman, A., & Gwenigale, W. (2012). Innovative financing in early recovery: The Liberia health sector pool fund. Center for Global Development, 1, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joulaei, H., Honarvar, B., Zamiri, N., Moghadami, M., & Lankarani, K. (2010). Introduction of a pyramidal model based on primary health care: A paradigm for management of 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 12, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kark, S. L. (1981). The Practice of Community-oriented Primary Health Care. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macagba, R. L. (2010). Innovations in hospital management: Success with limited resources. Santee, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmedo, B., Miranda, E., Cordon, O., Pettker, C. M., & Funai, E. F. (2013). Improving maternal health and safety through adherence to postpartum hemorrhage protocol in Latin America. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, H. B. (2013). Primary health care: A redefinition, history, trends, controversies and challenges. 1, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruger, J. (2007). Rethinking equal access: Agency, quality, and norms. Global Public Health, 1, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tackling Pneumonia and Diarrhea Together. (2013). Path, 1, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., & Minkler, M. (2008). Community-based Participatory Research for Health from Process to Outcomes. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg, D. E., Marr, A., Lang, L., O’Malley, S., & Bennett, G. (2010). A randomized trial of a telephone care-management strategy. The New England Journal of Medicine, 13, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, M., Austerberry, H., & Ward, H. (2012). Implementing evidence-based programmes in children’s services: Key issues for success (Vol. 1, p. 51). London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elvira Beracochea M.D., M.P.H. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beracochea, E. (2015). Realizing Global Health: Effective Health Systems. In: Beracochea, E. (eds) Improving Aid Effectiveness in Global Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2721-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2721-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2720-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2721-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics