Skip to main content

Abstract

Our understanding of resuscitation in trauma and critically ill patients has evolved. Traditional end points and goals include restoration to normal vital signs and urine output. We have progressed from these crude measures of circulation to include restoration of chemical markers of hypoperfusion such as lactate and venous oxygenation. However, such markers are not perfect; these are often late findings. As technology has progressed, we are able to collect data regarding microcirculation. It has been debated whether microcirculatory evidence of hypoxia will provide more valuable information to target resuscitation efforts. The use of these data to accurately assess the adequacy of perfusion is still under investigation. The additional use of ultrasound in monitoring hemodynamic status is another useful noninvasive instrument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tisherman SAM, et al. Clinical practice guideline: endpoints of resuscitation. J Trauma. 2004;57(4):898–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abou-Khalil BM, et al. Hemodynamic responses to shock in young trauma patients: need for invasive monitoring. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(4):633–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scale TMM, et al. Resuscitation of multiple trauma and head injury: role of crystalloid fluids and inotropes. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(10):1610–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jansen TC, et al. Early lactate-guided therapy in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(6):752–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin MJ, et al. Discordance between lactate and base deficit in the surgical intensive care unit: which one do you trust? Am J Surg. 2006;191(5):625–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. FitzSullivan E, et al. Serum bicarbonate may replace the arterial base deficit in the trauma intensive care unit. Am J Surg. 2005;190(6):961–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rivers E, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Puskarich MA, et al. Prognostic value and agreement of achieving lactate clearance or central venous oxygen saturation goals during early sepsis resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(3):252–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tyburski JG, et al. End-tidal CO2-derived values during emergency trauma surgery correlated with outcome: a prospective study. J Trauma. 2002;53(4):738–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Caputo ND, et al. Nasal cannula end-tidal CO2 correlates with serum lactate levels and odds of operative intervention in penetrating trauma patients: a prospective cohort study. J Trauma. 2012;73(5):1202–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Trzeciak S, et al. Microcirculatory Alterations in Resuscitation and Shock Investigators: early microcirculatory perfusion derangements in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: relationship to hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and survival. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(1):88–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trzeciak S, et al. Microcirculatory Alterations in Resuscitation and Shock (MARS) investigators. Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(12):2210–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holcomb JB, et al. Prehospital physiologic data and lifesaving interventions in trauma patients. Mil Med. 2005;170(1):7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gómez H, et al. Use of non-invasive NIRS during a vascular occlusion test to assess dynamic tissue O2 saturation response. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(9):1600–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Creteur J, et al. The prognostic value of muscle StO2 in septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(9):1549–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohn SM, et al. Tissue oxygen saturation predicts the development of organ dysfunction during traumatic shock resuscitation. J Trauma. 2007;62(1):44–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guyette FX, et al. Prehospital dynamic tissue oxygen saturation response predicts in-hospital lifesaving interventions in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2012;72(4):930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tiba MH, et al. Tissue oxygenation monitoring using resonance Raman spectroscopy during hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2014;76(2):402–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Clavijo-Alvarez JA, et al. Bladder mucosa pH and PCO2 as a minimally invasive monitor of hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation. J Trauma. 2004;57(6):1199–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu TS. The CORE scan: concentrated overview of resuscitative efforts. Crit Care Clin. 2014;30(1):151–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yanagawa Y, Sakamoto T, Okada Y. Hypovolemic shock evaluated by sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava during resuscitation in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007;63(6):1245–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(2):419–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lopes MR, et al. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007;11(5):R100.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang C-C, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(10):2810–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pronovost PJ, et al. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;288(17):2151–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Angus DC, et al. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA. 2000;284(21):2762–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Young LB, et al. Impact of telemedicine intensive care unit coverage on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(6):498–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Porter M.D., F.A.C.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robertson, T.E., Batson, S.D., Porter, J.M. (2015). End Points of Resuscitation. In: Latifi, R., Rhee, P., Gruessner, R. (eds) Technological Advances in Surgery, Trauma and Critical Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2671-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2671-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2670-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2671-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics