Skip to main content

Basic Choice Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Autism Service Delivery

Abstract

This chapter reviews basic research on choice from both the experimental analysis of behavior and cognitive sciences literature. Choice is a ubiquitous component in any organism’s behavior stream, necessitating a proper understanding of the variables governing choice to fully account for the universe of responding in a science of behavior. We provide only tentative discussions for translating basic findings to service delivery and place our comments within the boundaries and appropriate limitations of the extant literature. In general, this chapter reviews basic theories and models of choice, providing a general framework for the clinical applications that are discussed in Chap. 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Not to be confused with the behavior analytic account of behavioral economics that emerged from the operant laboratory from researchers such as Rachlin (1995) and Hursh (1980,1984); see Chaps. 10 and 11 of this volume for the behavior analytic account of behavioral economics.

  2. 2.

    Note that matching can be obtained on ratio schedules if they are programmed as interdependent random ratio (RR) schedules, wherein responding on one alternative impacts the availability at others (see Rothstein et al. 2008 for an example). We posit that real-world choices are likely most similar to interdependent RR schedules, rather than VI schedules.

References

  • Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242. doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, W. M., & Rachlin, H. C. (1969). Choice as time allocation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 861–874. doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (2004). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1975). Freedom and knowledge: An experimental analysis of preference in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 89–106.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1980). Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 77–86.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dallery, J., & Soto, P. L. (2004). Herrnstein’s hyperbolic matching equation and behavioral pharmacology: Review and critique. Behavioral Pharmacology, 15, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallery, J., McDowell, J. J., & Lancaster, J. S. (2000). Falsification of matching theory’s account of single-alternative responding: Herrnstein’s k varies with sucrose concentration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 23–43. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.73-23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dallery, J., Soto, P. L., & McDowell, J. J. (2005). A test of the formal and modern theories of matching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 129–145. doi:10.1901/jeab.2005.108-04.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement: New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Kapust, J., Leonard, S. R., & Rosenfarb, I. (1981). Escape from freedom: Choosing not to choose in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 1–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Loveland, D. H. (1975). Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 107–116. doi:10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, G. M., & Monaghan, M. M. (1994). Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 505–516.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, T. T. (2006). Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition. Cognitive Science, 30, 3–41. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, S. R. (1980). Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 219–238. doi:http://dx.org/10.1901/jeab.1980.34-219.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, S. R. (1984). Behavioral economics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 435–452. doi:http://dx.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.42-435.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Dorsey, M. F., Zarcone, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., Smith, R. G., Rodgers, T. A., Lerman, D. C., Shore, B. A., Mazaleski, J. L., Goh, H-L, Cowdery, G. E., Kalsher, M. J., McCosh, K. C., & Willis, K. D. et al. (1994). The functions of self-injurious behavior: An experimental-epidemiological analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215–240. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-215.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B. A., & Reed, D. D. (2013). Decision processes in choice overload: A product of delay and probability discounting? Behavioural Processes, 97, 21–24. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kollins, S. H., Lane, S. D., & Shapiro, S. K. (1997). Experimental analysis of childhood psychopathology: A laboratory matching analysis of the behavior of children diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The Psychological Record, 47, 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, B. K., & Houk, J. L. (1989). The application of Herrnstein’s law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 17–27. doi:10.1901/jeab.1989.51-17.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matson, J. L., & Boisjoli, J. A. (2009). The token economy for children with intellectual disability and/or autism: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 240–248. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. J. (1982). The importance of Herrnstein’s mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. American Psychologist, 37, 771–779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. J. (2013). On the theoretical and empirical status of the matching law and matching theory. Psychologial Bulletin, 139, 1000–1028. doi:10.1037/a0029924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. J., & Dallery, J. (1999). Falsification of matching theory: Changes in the asymptote of Herrnstein’s hyperbola as a function of water deprivation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 251–268. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.72-251.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petscher, E. S., & Bailey, J. S. (2008). Comparing main and collateral effects of extinction and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior. Behavior Modification, 32, 468–488. doi:10.1177/0145445507309032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1983). Choice, matching, and human behavior: A review of the literature. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 57–76.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pietras, C. J., Brandt, A. E., & Searcy, G. D. (2010). Human responding on random-interval schedules of response-cost punishment: The role of reduced reinforcement density. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 5–26. doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (1992). Teleological behaviorism. The American Psychologist, 47, 1371–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (1995). Behavioral economics without anomalies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 397–404. doi:10.1901/jeab.1995.64-397.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (2007). In what sense are addicts irrational? Drug Alcohol Depend, 90, S92–S99. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.07.011.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H., Green, L., & Tormey, B. (1988). Is there a decisive test between matching and maximizing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 113–123. doi:10.1901/jeab.1988.50-113.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raiff, B. R., Bullock, C. E., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2008). Response-cost punishment with pigeons: Further evidence of response suppression via token loss. Learning & Behavior, 36, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E. B., & Newland, M. C. (2008). Asymmetry of reinforcement and punishment in human choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 157–167.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. D., & Kaplan, B. A. (2011). The matching law: A tutorial for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 4, 15–24.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. D., & Martens, B. K. (2008). Sensitivity and bias under conditions of equal and unequal academic task difficulty. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 39–52. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-39.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. D., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., Chok, J., & Brozyna, G. A. (2011). The “tyranny of choice”: Choice overload as a possible instance of effort discounting. The Psychological Record, 61, 547–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. D., Kaplan, B. A., & Brewer, A. T. (2012). Discounting the freedom to choose: Implications for the paradox of choice. Behavioural Processes, 90, 424–427. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, J. B., Jensen, G., & Neuringer, A. (2008). Human choice among five alternatives when reinforcers decay. Behavioural Processes, 78, 231–239. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.016.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Can there ever be too many options? A meta‐analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 409–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M. T. A., Goncalves, F. L., & Garcia-Mijares, M. (2007). Neural events in the reinforcement contingency. The Behavior Analyst, 30, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity: New York: Knopf/Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, S. C., & Homzie, M. J. (1970). Choice as a value. Psychological Reports, 26, 912–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wearden, J. H., & Burgess, I. S. (1982). Matching since Baum (1979). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 339–348. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.38-339.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek D. Reed Ph.D., BCBA-D .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reed, D., Tiger, J. (2015). Basic Choice Research. In: DiGennaro Reed, F., Reed, D. (eds) Autism Service Delivery. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2656-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics