Diagnostic Hip Arthroscopy

Abstract

Hip arthroscopy has become a powerful tool in the treatment of non-arthritic hip conditions and injuries. The proliferation of hip arthroscopy has fueled the vast expansion in the understanding of hip anatomy and pathology and has allowed systematic correlation of MR findings to arthroscopic findings. During arthroscopy, the hip is functionally divided into the central compartment and the peripheral compartment. Pathology pertaining to the labrum, acetabular rim, articular cartilage, and ligamentum teres is evaluated and addressed in the central compartment, while the peripheral compartment includes the femoral head neck junction and femoral neck. Careful evaluation of preoperative imaging including MRI allows the surgeon to efficiently detect and correct pathology during arthroscopy. Anatomical variants may mimic pathological conditions and the surgeon should be aware of potential variants when treating hip conditions arthroscopically.

Keywords

Gadolinium 

References

  1. 1.
    McCarthy JC, Lee J-A. History of hip arthroscopy: challenges and opportunities. Clin Sports Med. 2011;30(2):217–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Byrd JWT. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(7):433–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kelly BT, Williams RJ, Philippon MJ. Hip arthroscopy: current indications, treatment options, and management issues. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):1020–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsuda DK, Carlisle JC, Arthurs SC, Wierks CH, Philippon MJ. Comparative systematic review of the open dislocation, mini-open, and arthroscopic surgeries for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(2):252–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keeney JA, Peelle MW, Jackson J, Rubin D, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC. Magnetic resonance arthrography versus arthroscopy in the evaluation of articular hip pathology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:163–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Byrd JWT. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography, and intra-articular injection in hip arthroscopy patients. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(7):1668–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toomayan GA, Holman WR, Major NM, Kozlowicz SM, Vail TP. Sensitivity of MR arthrography in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(2):449–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freedman BA, Potter BK, Dinauer PA, Giuliani JR, Kuklo TR, Murphy KP. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography for Czerny stage II and III acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(7):742–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang CY, Huang AJ. MR imaging of normal hip anatomy. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013;21(1):1–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sundberg TP, Toomayan GA, Major NM. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum at 3.0-T MR imaging compared with 1.5-T MR arthrography: preliminary experience. Radiology. 2006;238(2):706–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Byrd JW, Pappas JN, Pedley MJ. Hip arthroscopy: an anatomic study of portal placement and relationship to the extra-articular structures. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(4):418–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robertson WJ, Kelly BT. The safe zone for hip arthroscopy: a cadaveric assessment of central, peripheral, and lateral compartment portal placement. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(9):1019–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ilizaliturri VM, Byrd JWT, Sampson TG, et al. A geographic zone method to describe intra-articular pathology in hip arthroscopy: cadaveric study and preliminary report. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(5):534–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saddik D, Troupis J, Tirman P, O’Donnell J, Howells R. Prevalence and location of acetabular sublabral sulci at hip arthroscopy with retrospective MRI review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(5):W507–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen MS, Kheyfits V, Giordano BD, Dieudonne G, Monu JUV. Hip anatomic variants that may mimic abnormalities at MRI: labral variants. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(3):W394–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Studler U, Kalberer F, Leunig M, et al. MR arthrography of the hip: differentiation between an anterior sublabral recess as a normal variant and a labral tear. Radiology. 2008;249(3):947–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wenger DE, Kendell KR, Miner MR, Trousdale RT. Acetabular labral tears rarely occur in the absence of bony abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426(426):145–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paliobeis CP, Villar RN. Arthroscopic identification of iliopubic and ilioischial grooves in a single adult acetabulum. BMJ Case Rep. 2010;2010:1–3.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Byrd JWT. [Hip arthroscopy. Portal technique and arthroscopic anatomy]. Orthopade. 2006;35(1):41–2, 44–50, 52–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dietrich TJ, Suter A, Pfirrmann CWA, Dora C, Fucentese SF, Zanetti M. Supraacetabular fossa (pseudodefect of acetabular cartilage): frequency at MR arthrography and comparison of findings at MR arthrography and arthroscopy. Radiology. 2012;263(2):484–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keene GS, Villar RN. Arthroscopic anatomy of the hip: an in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(4):392–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Byrd JWT. Hip arthroscopy in athletes. In: Byrd JWT, editor. Operative hip arthroscopy. New York: Springer; 2012.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Byrd JWT. Supraacetabular fossa. Radiology. 2012;265(2):648. Author reply 648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(5):679–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anderson K, Strickland SM, Warren R. Hip and groin injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(4):521–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kalhor M, Beck M, Huff TW, Ganz R. Capsular and pericapsular contributions to acetabular and femoral head perfusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(2):409–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ito H, Song Y, Lindsey DP, Safran MR, Giori NJ. The proximal hip joint capsule and the zona orbicularis contribute to hip joint stability in distraction. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(8):989–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of Virginia Health SystemCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedics and RehabilitationVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations