Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fire Risk Indexing

  • Chapter
SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering

Abstract

Fire risk indexing is a link between fire science and fire safety. As we learn more about the behavior of fire, it is important that we implement new knowledge to meet fire safety goals and objectives. One of the barriers to implementing new technology is the lack of structured fire safety decision making. Fire risk indexing is evolving as a method of evaluating fire safety that is valuable in assimilating research results. Fire safety decisions often have to be made under conditions where the data are sparse and uncertain. The technical attributes of fire risk are very complex and normally involve a network of interacting components. These interactions are generally nonlinear and multidimensional. However, complexity and sparseness of data do not preclude useful and valid approaches. Such circumstances are not unusual in decision making in business or other risk venues. (The space program illustrates how success can be achieved when there are few relevant data). However, detailed risk assessment can be an expensive and labor-intensive process, and there is considerable room for improving the presentation of results. Indexing can provide a cost-effective means of risk evaluation that is both useful and valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 869.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Index Approach to Quantifying Risk,” in Proceedings—SFPE Symposium on Risk, Uncertainty, and Reliability in Fire Protection Engineering, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Assessment Using Multiattribute Evaluation,” in Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.E. Nelson, “Overview—Numerical Grading Systems,” Report from the 1987 Workshop on Analytical Methods for Designing Buildings for Fire Safety, Building Research Board, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Rating Schedules,” in ASTM STP1150, Fire Hazard and Fire Risk Assessment (M.M. Hirschler, ed.), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 24–34 (1992).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Tools for Making Acute Risk Decisions with Chemical Process Safety Applications, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, p. 35 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.R. Rosenblum and S.A. Lapp, “The Use of Risk Index Systems to Evaluate Risk,” in Risk Analysis: Setting National Priorities, Proceedings of the Society for Risk Analysis, Society for Risk Analysis, McLean, VA (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Report from the 1987 Workshop on Analytical Methods for Designing Buildings for Fire Safety, Building Research Board, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.H. Magee and D.L. Bickelhaupt, General Insurance, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL, p. 153 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.F. Dean, Analytic System for the Measurement of Relative Fire Hazard, Western Actuarial Bureau, Chicago (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.S. Glidden, Analytic System for the Measurement of Relative Fire Hazard, an Explanation, Western Actuarial Bureau, Chicago, p. 17 (1916).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Specific Commercial Property Evaluation Schedule, Insurance Services Office, New York (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. BVD, Evaluation of Fire Hazard and Determining Protective Measures, Association of Cantonal Institutions for Fire Insurance (VKF) and Fire Prevention Service for Industry and Trade (BVD), Zurich, Switzerland (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Fontana, “Swiss Rapid Risk Assessment Method, Institute of Structural Engineering,” SIA 81, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Kaiser, “Experiences of the Gretener Method,” Fire Safety Journal, 2, pp. 213–222 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.C. Valente, “The Evaluation of the Fire Safety Level in a Historic Centre in Lisbon,” in Proceedings, International Conference on Fire Protection of Cultural Heritage (K.K. Papaioannou, ed.), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 225–234 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dow Chemical Company, “Process Safety Manual,” Chemical Engineering Progress, 62, 6 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dow Chemical Company, Dow’s Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide, 7th ed., American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. N.E. Scheffler, “Improved Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Classification,” AICHE Spring National Meeting (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, p. 32 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. NFPA 704, Standard System for the Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency Response, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2007 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  21. NFPA 49, Hazardous Chemicals Data, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1994 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  22. NFPA 325, Fire Hazard Properties of Flammable Liquids, Gases, and Volatile Solids, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 1994 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P172-2E, Occupational Safety Report Guideline for Compilation, Directorate-General of Labour of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, Voorburg, The Netherlands (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Lewis, “The Mond Fire Explosion, and Toxicity Index—A Development of the Dow Index,” paper presented at the AIChE Loss Prevention Symposium, Houston, TX, April 1–5, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Mond Index, 2nd ed., Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) PLC, Explosion Hazards Section, Technical Department, Winnington, UK (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  26. I.A. Benjamin, “A Firesafety Evaluation System for Health Care Facilities,” Fire Journal, 73, 2 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  27. H.E. Nelson and A.J. Shibe, “A System for Fire Safety Evaluation of Health Care Facilities,” NBSIR 78-1555, Center for Fire Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  28. NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2000 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  29. NFPA 101A, Guide on Alternative Approaches to Life Safety, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R.E. Chapman, “Cost-Effective Methods for Achieving Compliance to Firesafety Codes,” Fire Journal, 73, pp. 30–39, 123 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R.E. Chapman, W.G. Hall, and P.T. Chen, “Economic Aspects of Fire Safety in Health Care Facilities: Guidelines for Cost-Effective Retrofits,” NBSIR 79-1902, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R.E. Chapman, W.G. Hall, and P.T. Chen, “A Computerized Approach for Identifying Cost-Effective Fire Safety Retrofits in Health Care Facilities,” NBSIR 79-1929, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.E. Chapman and W.G. Hall, “Code Compliance at Lower Costs: A Mathematical Programming Approach,” Fire Technology, 18, 1, pp. 77–89 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. R.E. Chapman and W.G. Hall, “User’s Manual for the Fire Safety Evaluation System Cost Minimizer Computer Program,” NBSIR 83-2796, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  35. R.E. Chapman and W.G. Hall, “Programmer’s Manual for the Fire Safety Evaluation System Cost Minimizer Computer Program,” NBSIR 83-2749, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  36. H.E. Nelson, “Fire Safety Evaluation System for NASA Office/Laboratory Buildings,” NBSIR 86-3404, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  37. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Analysis of the NFPA Fire Safety Evaluation System for Business Occupancies,” Fire Technology, 33, 3, pp. 276–282 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. The BOCA National Building Code, Building Officials and Code Administrators International, Country Club Hills, IL (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  39. International Building Code, International Code Council, Whittier, CA (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  40. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Evaluation in the Codes: A Comparative Analysis,” in Proceedings—Second International Conference on Fire Research and Engineering, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, pp. 226–237 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  41. “Chapter ILHR 70, Historic Buildings,” in Wisconsin Administrative Code, Department of Industry, Labor, and Human Relations, Madison, WI (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fire Safety Evaluation (Points) Scheme for Patient Areas Within Hospitals, Department of Fire Safety Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Scotland (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  43. P. Stollard, “The Development of a Points Scheme to Assess Fire Safety in Hospitals,” Fire Safety Journal, 7, 2, pp. 145–153 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. E. Marchant, “Fire Safety Engineering—A Quantified Analysis,” Fire Prevention, 210, pp. 34–38 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  45. T.J. Shields and G.W. Silcock, “An Application of the Hierarchical Approach to Fire Safety,” Fire Safety Journal, 11, 3, pp. 235–242 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. H.A. Donegan, T.J. Shields, and G.W. Silcock, “A Mathematical Strategy to Relate Fire Safety Evaluation and Fire Safety Policy Formulation for Buildings,” in Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium (Takao Wakamatsu et al., eds.), Hemisphere, New York, pp. 433–441 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  47. L.L. Parks, B.D. Kushler, M.J. Serapiglia, L.A. McKenna, Jr., E.K. Budnick, and J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Assessment for Telecommunications Central Offices,” Fire Technology, 34, 2, pp. 156–176 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. E.K. Budnick, L.A. McKenna, Jr., and J.M. Watts, Jr., “Quantifying Fire Risk for Telecommunications Network Integrity,” in Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, London, UK, pp. 691–700 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  49. T.J. Shields, G.W. Silcock, and Y. Bell, “Fire Safety Evaluation of Dwellings,” Fire Safety Journal, 10, 1, pp. 29–36 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. F.J. Dodd and H.A. Donegan, “Prioritization Methodologies in Fire Safety Evaluation,” Fire Technology, 30, 2, pp. 232–249 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. NFPA 550, Guide to the Fire Safety Concepts Tree, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  52. R.T. Eckenrode, “Weighting Multiple Criteria,” Management Science, 12, pp. 180–192 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. C.L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York (1981).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, John Wiley, New York (1980).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. T.L. Saaty, Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1990).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. J.M. Watts, Jr., E.K. Budnick, and B.D. Kushler, “Using Decision Tables to Quantify Fire Risk Parameters,” in Proceedings, International Conference on Fire Research and Engineering (D.P. Lund, ed.), Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, pp. 241–246 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  57. J.M. Watts, Jr., and M.E. Kaplan, “Fire Risk Index for Historic Buildings,” Fire Technology, 37, 1 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  58. M.E. Kaplan and J.M. Watts, Jr., “A Prototypical Fire Risk Index to Evaluate Fire Safety in Historic Buildings,” APT Bulletin, 30, 2–3, pp. 49–55 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. S.M. Lo, “A Fire Safety Assessment System for Existing Buildings,” Fire Technology, 35, 2, pp. 131–152 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. L.T. Wong and S.W. Lau, “A Fire Safety Evaluation System for Prioritizing Fire Improvements in Old High-Rise Buildings in Hong Kong,” Fire Technology, 43, 3 pp. 233–249 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. A.G. Copping, “Fire Safety Evaluation Procedure for the Property Protection of English Parish Churches: A Tool to Aid Decision Making,” in Proceedings, International Conference on Fire Protection of Cultural Heritage, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 255–268 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  62. S.E. Magnusson and T. Rantatalo, “Risk Assessment of Timberframe Multistorey Apartment Buildings: Proposal for a Comprehensive Fire Safety Evaluation Procedure,” IR 7004, Department of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund University, Sweden (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  63. H. Hultquist and B. Karlsson, “Evaluation of a Fire Risk Index Method for Timber-Frame, Multi-Storey Apartment Buildings,” Report 31XX, Department of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund University, Sweden (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  64. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Criteria for Fire Risk Ranking,” in Fire Safety Science—Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium (G. Cox and B. Langford, eds.), Elsevier, London, pp. 457–466 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  65. S.I. Gass, “Documenting a Computer Based Model,” Interfaces, 14, 3, pp. 84–93 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  66. ASTM, ASTM E1472, Documenting Computer Software for Fire Models, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  67. ASTM, ASTM E1355, Evaluating the Predictive Capability of Deterministic Fire Models, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  68. S.F. Weber and B.C. Lippiatt, “Cost-Effective Compliance with Life Safety Codes,” Fire Technology, 32, 4, pp. 291–296 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. S.F. Weber and B.C. Lippiatt, “ALARM 1.0, Decision Support Software for Cost-Effective Compliance with Fire Safety Codes,” NISTIR 5554, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  70. S.F. Weber and L.I. Schultz, “ALARM 2.0 Users Manual: Minimizing Compliance Costs of the Life Safety Code for Prisons,” NISTIR 6807, National Institute for Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  71. L.L. Parks, “COFRA-2: A Tool to Aid in Telecommunications Central Office Fire Risk Assessment,” in Proceedings, Fire Risk and Hazard Assessment Symposium, National Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA, pp. 523–540 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hughes Associates, Inc., “Fire Safety Evaluation System (FSES) for Business Occupancies Software (Version 1.0 for Windows) User’s Manual,” NIST-GCR-96-692, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hughes Associates, Inc., Enhanced Fire Safety Evaluation System for Business Occupancies Software, Version 1.2, Hughes Associates, Inc., Baltimore (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  74. FREM for Windows, User’s Manual, National Risk Control Services Pty. Ltd., Bayswater, Victoria, Australia (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  75. J.M. Watts, Jr., “Fire Risk Evaluation Model” (review), Fire Technology, 31, 4, pp. 369–371 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. RiskPro, SimCo Consulting, Wantirna South, Victoria, Australia (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  77. P.B. Parikh and D.A. Crowl, “Implementation and Application of the Dow Hazard Evaluation Indices in a Computer-Based Environment,” in Proceedings: International Conference and Workshop on Reliability and Risk Management, San Antonio, TX, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, pp. 65–83 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  78. D.J. Rasbash, G. Ramachandran, B. Kandola, J.M. Watts, Jr., and M. Law, Evaluation of Fire Safety, John Wiley, London (2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fire Safety Institute, Middlebury, USA

    John M. Watts Jr.

Authors
  1. John M. Watts Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Aon Fire Protection Engineering, Greenbelt, MD, USA

    Morgan J. Hurley P.E., FSFPE (Editor-in-Chief) (Editor-in-Chief)

  2. Hughes Associates, Baltimore, USA

    Daniel Gottuk Ph.D., P.E.

  3. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, USA

    John R. Hall Jr. Ph.D.

  4. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Kazunori Harada Dr. Eng.

  5. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA

    Erica Kuligowski Ph.D.

  6. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, USA

    Milosh Puchovsky P.E., FSFPE

  7. The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia

    José Torero Ph.D.

  8. The Fire Safety Institute, Quincy, USA

    John M. Watts Jr. Ph.D., FSFPE

  9. FM Global, Johnston, USA

    Christopher Wieczorek Ph.D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Society of Fire Protection Engineers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watts, J.M. (2016). Fire Risk Indexing. In: Hurley, M.J., et al. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_82

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2564-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2565-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation