Skip to main content

Circles of Support & Accountability: The Role of the Community in Effective Sexual Offender Risk Management

  • Chapter

Abstract

The release of sexual offenders to the community continues to raise concerns for lawmakers, criminal justice professionals, and the community at large. Over the last 30 years, legislative attempts were made to limit sexual offender release opportunities and movement, including longer sentences, lifetime probation, registration and notification, and GPS monitoring. However, the science behind these measures remains questionable, and emerging reports suggest that some measures may actually cause more harm than good. Specifically, some current risk management efforts create greater social ostracism and isolation for offenders, which are linked to increased risk. Against this backdrop, attempts have been made to inject restorative justice theory and practice into ensuring higher reintegration potential for released sexual offenders. In this chapter, we focus primarily on the Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA) model of wraparound care for high-risk/high-need sexual offenders. CoSA began in Canada as a grassroots effort to address the difficulties posed by the release of high-risk/high-need sexual offenders with little community support or opportunities for safe reintegration. The CoSA model consists of two concentric circles, the inner of which is comprised of a released sexual offender, known as a core member, and four to six trained and supported community volunteers. The outer circle is comprised of local professionals with expert knowledge about sexual offender risk management. The volunteers provide support and an accountability framework for the offender, often mimicking the sort of family or friendly relationships enjoyed by non-offending citizens, while the outer circle is available to provide training and professional consultation to the inner circle as needed. The CoSA model has been in use in Canada for 20 years and the United Kingdom for more than 10 and is gaining increased favor in the United States and other international jurisdictions. Research findings suggest that risk for sexual reoffending may be reduced by as much as 70 % or more in comparison to similar offenders who do not receive a CoSA. The model is described in depth, research findings are summarized, and policy and practice implications are discussed.

Keywords

  • Sexual offender risk management
  • Circles of support and accountability
  • Restorative justice
  • Volunteers
  • Wraparound care
  • Evidence-based practices

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2416-5_31
  • Chapter length: 10 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4939-2416-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    While in the institution, an assessment report composed using an early version of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG—see Quinsey, Harris, Rice, and Cormier, 2006) had put Charlie’s risk potential at 100 % chance of sexual or violent reoffending in 7 years.

References

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. S. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A., Saunders, R., & Wilson, C. (2007). Doing something about it: A follow-up study of sexual offenders participating in Thames Valley circles of support & accountability. British Journal of Community Justice, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A., Williams, D., Wilson, C., & Wilson, R. J. (2013). Circles South East: The first 10 years 2002-2012. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 861–885.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Correctional Service of Canada. (2002a). Circles of support & accountability: A guide to training potential volunteers, Training manual 2002 [Online]. Ottawa, ON: Author. Available: www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/prgrm/chap/Circle/cs_guide_final3_e.shtml

  • Correctional Service of Canada (2002b). Forging a community. Ottawa, ON: CSC and Red Herring Productions, Eric Geringas, Director.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtiss, P. R., & Warren, P. W. (1973). The dynamics of life skills coaching. Prince Albert, SK: Saskatchewan NewStart (for the Training Research and Development Station Dept. of Manpower and Immigration).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duwe, G. (2013). Can circles of support and accountability work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, K., Pullen, S., & Jones, L. (1998). The containment approach: An aggressive strategy for community management of adult sex offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(1/2), 218–235.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Estroff, S. E., Zimmer, C., Lachicotte, W. S., & Benoit, J. (1994). The influence of social networks and social support on violence by persons with serious mental illness. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D. (1984). Sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., & Araji, S. (1986). Explanations of pedophilia: A four-factor model. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 154–161.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Grubin, D. (1997). Inferring predictors of risk: Sex offenders. International Review of Psychiatry, 9, 225–231.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Lobos, K., Eher, R., Grünhut, C., Bankier, B., Schmidl-Mohl, B., Frühwald, S., et al. (2001). Violent sex offenders lack male social support. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 70–82.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: Risk, need, and responsivity. Corrections Research Report No. 2009-01. Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T.-L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. [User Report 2007-05] Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, E., Kirkegaard, H., & Wilson, R. J. (1997, October). Circles of support: A community re-integration project. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmus, L. (2009). Re-norming Static-99 recidivism estimates: Exploring base rate variability across sex offender samples (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. MR58443).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. (1997). Intimacy, loneliness and attachment style in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 322–339.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lane Council of Governments. (2003). Managing sex offenders in the community: A national overview. Eugene, OR: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., & D’Amora, D. A. (2007). Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: The emperor’s new clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 168–199.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, R., & Marshall, W. L. (1999). Social functioning. In W. L. Marshall, D. Anderson, & Y. M. Fernandez (Eds.), Cognitive behavioural treatment of sexual offenders (pp. 93–109). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W. L. (1989). Intimacy loneliness and sexual offenders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 491–504.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W. L., Barbaree, H. E., & Fernandez, Y. M. (1995). Some aspects of social competence in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maté, G. (2008). In the realm of hungry ghosts: Close encounters with addiction. Toronto, ON: Vintage House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, M. H., Robinson, B. E., Knight, R. A., Berg, D., Romine, R. S., & Netland, J. (2010). Understanding sexual perpetration against children: Effects of attachment style, interpersonal involvement, and hypersexuality. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacht, A. R., & Cowen, J. E. (1974). An exploratory study of five hundred sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1, 13–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peace, Q., & Witness, S. (2005). Circles of support & accountability in the Thames Valley: The first three years April 2002 to March 2005. London, UK: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R. & Wilson, C. (2003) Circles of support & accountability in the Thames Valley, Interim Report (available from the author).

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, S. V., & Marshall, W. L. (1986). Discrepancies between self-efficacy predictions and actual performance in a population of rapists and child molesters. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 363–376.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, J., & Wilson, D. (2002). Innocence betrayed: Paedophilia, the media and society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Laws, D. R., & Hudson, S. M. (2003). Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies. London, UK: Sage.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G., & Grace, R. C. (2008). The quality of community reintegration planning for child molesters: Effects on sexual recidivism. ATSA Forum, 20, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. M. & Grace, R. C. (2009). Assessment of community reintegration planning for sex offenders: Poor planning predicts recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 494–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J., Cortoni, F., & McWhinnie, A. J. (2009). Circles of support & accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 412–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J., McWhinnie, A. J., Picheca, J. E., Prinzo, M., & Cortoni, F. (2007). Circles of support & accountability: Engaging community volunteers in the management of high-risk sexual offenders. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 1–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J., McWhinnie, A. J., & Wilson, C. (2008). Circles of support & accountability: An international partnership in reducing sexual offender recidivism. Prison Service Journal, 138, 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J. & McWhinnie, A. J. (2013). Putting the “community” back in community risk management. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 8, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J., & Picheca, J. E. (2005). Circles of support & accountability: Engaging the community in sexual offender risk management. In B. Schwartz (Ed.), The sex offender (Vol. 5). New York, NY: Civic Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J., Picheca, J. E., & Prinzo, M. (2007a). Evaluating the effectiveness of professionally-facilitated volunteerism in the community-based management of high risk sexual offenders: Part One—Effects on participants and stakeholders. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 289–302.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.J., Picheca, J.E., & Prinzo, M. (2007b). Evaluating the effectiveness of professionally facilitated volunteerism in the community-based management of high risk sexual offenders: Part two—A comparison of recidivism rates. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J., & Prinzo, M. (2000, November). Circles of support & accountability: Interim evaluation and outcome data. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. J., & Yates, P. M. (2009). Effective interventions and the good lives model: Maximizing treatment gains for sexual offenders. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 14, 157–161.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yantzi, M. (1998). Sexual offending and restoration. Waterloo, ON: Herald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, P. M., Prescott, D. S., & Ward, T. (2010). Applying the good lives and self-regulation models to sex offender treatment: A practical guide for clinicians. Brandon, VT: Safer Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin J. Wilson Ph.D., A.B.P.P. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, R.J., McWhinnie, A.J. (2016). Circles of Support & Accountability: The Role of the Community in Effective Sexual Offender Risk Management. In: Phenix, A., Hoberman, H. (eds) Sexual Offending. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2416-5_31

Download citation