Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Sexual Offending pp 571–588Cite as

Structured Professional Judgment: Applications to Sexual Offender Risk Assessment and Management

  • Chapter

Abstract

The chapter will begin with a brief overview of the task of clinical risk assessment and management. As will become clear, the SPJ approach emphasizes the importance of understanding the risks posed by individual clients. Therefore, the chapter will go on to describe the SPJ approach to risk formulation, an essential process that links risk assessment with risk management via an understanding of the function or purpose of sexual violence for the individual. The structured professional judgment approach will then be illustrated through a description of the development and application of the Sexual Violence Risk-20 professional guidelines (SVR-20; Boer et al. (1997). Manual for the sexual violence risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence and the Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University) and the more recent structured professional guidelines known as the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP; Hart et al. (2003). The risk for sexual violence protocol: Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, Canada: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University). A case study will be provided to illustrate the main features of the SPJ approach to working with sexual offenders. The chapter will end with a set of practice recommendations and suggestions for future research into sexual violence risk assessment and management using the SPJ approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaree, H. E., Langton, C. M., Blanchard, R., & Boer, D. P. (2008). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the SVR-20: The contribution of age-at-release. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7, 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the sexual violence risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia Institute on Family Violence and the Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2002). Manual for the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M., & Bond, F. W. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond diagnosis: Case formulation approaches to cognitive behaviour therapy. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chermack, T. J., & Lynham, S. A. (2002). Definitions and outcome variables of resource planning. Human Resource Development Review, 1, 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D., Beech, A., & Stringer, I. (2006). Differences in personality and risk characteristics in sex, violent and general offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 16, 183–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2009). SAPROF: Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. Utrecht: Forum Educatief.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., van Beek, D., & Mead, G. (2004). Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and Human Behaviour, 28, 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, R. J. (1998). Prediction of sexually violent recidivism: A comparison of risk assessment instruments. Unpublished Masters thesis. Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, R. J., & Hart, S. D. (2002). The relative utility of fixed and variable risk factors in discriminating sexual recidivists and non-recidivists. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 41, 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietiker, J., Dittmann, V., & Graf, M. (2007). Gutachterliche Risikoeinschätzung bei Sexualstraftätern Anwendbarkeit von PCL:SV, HCR-20 + 3 und SVR-20 [Risk assessment of sex offenders in a German-speaking sample: Applicability of PCL:SV, HCR-20 + 3, and SVR-20]. Nervenarzt, 78, 53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence, third edition. Vancouver: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. S., & Kropp, P. R. (2002). A prevention-based paradigm for violence risk assessment: Clinical and research applications. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 617–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. S., Webster, C. D., Hart, S. D., Eaves, D., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (Eds.). (2001). HCR-20 violence risk management companion guide. Burnaby, British Columbia: Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., & Jackson, K. (2008). The predictive validity of the risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Vienna, Austria. July, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D. (2003). Assessing risk for sexual violence: The risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Miami, Florida, April, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., & Boer, D. P. (2010). Structured professional judgment guidelines for sexual violence risk assessment: The sexual violence risk–20 (SVR-20) and risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP). In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment tools (pp. 269–294). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. K., Laws, D. R., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K. A. (2003). The risk for sexual violence protocol: Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, Canada: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. D., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. J. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group vs. individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrin, K. (2001). Risk assessment and risk management: Towards an integration. Plenary session delivered at the International Conference, Violence Risk Assessment and Management: Bringing Science and Practice Closer Together. Sundsvall, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A., Habermann, N., Klusmann, D., Berner, W., & Briken, P. (2008). Criminal recidivism in sexual homicide perpetrators. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 5–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K., & Healey, J. (2008). Concurrent validity of the RSVP vis-à-vis the SVR-20, Static-99, Static-2002, and SORAG. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Vienna, Austria, July, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (Eds.). (2006). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaver, J., Watt, K., Kropp, P. R., & Hart, S. D. (2002). Actuarial assessment of risk for sexual violence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL, August, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, P. R. (2001). The risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP). Paper presented at the Founding Conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Vancouver, Canada, April, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (2001). Spousal assault risk assessment guide: User’s manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Lyon, D. (2008). Guidelines for stalking assessment and management (SAM): User manual. Vancouver, Canada: ProActive ReSolutions Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. M. (2003). Contrasting approaches to risk assessment with adult male sexual offenders: An evaluation of recidivism prediction schemes and the utility of supplementary clinical information for enhancing predictive accuracy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute of Medical Science University of Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. (2014). The HCR-20 Version 3: A case study in risk formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13, 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C., & Hird, J. (2014). Psychopathy and sexual offending. In D.T. Wilcox, T. Garrett and L. Harkins (Eds), Sex Offender Treatment: A Case Study Approach to Issues and Interventions. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwack, T. R. (2001). Actuarial versus clinical assessment of dangerousness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 409–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. (2008). Sexual deviance in females: Psychopathology and theory. In R. D. Laws & W. O’Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C., Nathan, R., & Brown, A. (2011). Formulation in clinical risk assessment and management. In R. W. Whittington & C. Logan (Eds.), Self-harm and violence: Towards best practice in managing risk in mental health services. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C., Nedopil, N., & Wolf, T. (2011). Risk management: An international perspective. In R. W. Whittington & C. Logan (Eds.), Self-harm and violence: Towards best practice in managing risk in mental health services. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, G. J. D. (2003). Predicting escalation in sexually violent recidivism: Use of the SVR-20 and PCL:SV to predict outcome with non-contact recidivists and contact recidivists. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 14, 615–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. K., & Douglas, K. S. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of violence risk assessment tools. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. (2002). What doctors don’t know (almost everything). New York Times Magazine, 5th May, 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, L., Rasmussen, K., & Elsass, P. (2010). Risk assessment: The value of structured professional judgement. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9, 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Ramírez, M., Redondo Illescas, S., Martínez García, M., Carcía Forero, C., & Andrés Pueyo, A. (2008). Predicción de riesgo de reincidencia en agresores sexuales. Psicothema, 20, 205–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persons, J. B. (1989). Cognitive therapy in practice: A case formulation approach. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettenberger, M., & Eher, R. (2007). Predicting reoffence in sexual offender subtypes: A prospective validation study of the German version of the sexual offender risk appraisal guide (SORAG). Sexual Offender Treatment, 2, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Muir Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t—it’s about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt, G., & Långström, N. (2003). Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists: A comparison of four different measures. Psychology Crime and Law, 8, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, A. A., Johnstone, L., Davidson, K. M., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., Logan, C., Michie, C., & Stocks, R. (2012). Sexual violence risk assessment: An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of judgements made using the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenbaum, S. J. (2005). Evidence-based practice as mental health policy: Three controversies and a caveat. Health Affairs, 24, 163–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrier, N. (2006). Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, K. (1994). Probabilistic planning and scenario planning. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 549–572). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K., Hart, S. D., Wilson, C., Guy, L., & Douglas, K. S. D. (2006). An evaluation of the risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP) in high risk offenders: Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, St Petersburg, Florida, March, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, K., & Jackson, K., (July, 2008). Inter-rater and structural reliabilities of the risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP). Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (2nd ed.) Vancouver: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University and the British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C. D., Martin, M. L., Brink, J., Nicholls, T. L., & Middleton, C. (2004). Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START). Hamilton, ON; Port Coquitlam, BC: St Joseph’s Healthcare & Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanatta, R. (2005). Risk of violence and sexual recidivism: A comparison of dangerous offenders and repetitive sexual offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Prestwich Hospital, Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester, M25 3BL, England, UK

    Caroline Logan

Authors
  1. Caroline Logan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Logan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Private Practice, Morro Bay, California, USA

    Amy Phenix

  2. PACIFICA Center, Forensic Psychology Consultations, Wayzata, Minnesota, USA

    Harry M. Hoberman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Logan, C. (2016). Structured Professional Judgment: Applications to Sexual Offender Risk Assessment and Management. In: Phenix, A., Hoberman, H. (eds) Sexual Offending. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2416-5_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation