Abstract
The original presentation of what we know as Boyle’s law has several interesting features. First, the technical difficulties of the experiment were considerable, because Boyle used a glass tube full of mercury that was nearly 2.5 m long, and the large pressures sometimes shattered the glass. Next, Boyle’s table of results contains extremely awkward fractions, such 10/13, 2/17, 13/19, and 18/23, which look very strange to us today. This was because he calculated the pressure for a certain volume of gas by using simple multiplication and division, keeping the vulgar fractions. Boyle was not able to express the numbers as decimals because this notation was not in common use at the time. Finally, his contention that pressure and volume were inversely related depended on the reader’s comparing two sets of numbers in adjacent columns to see how well they agreed. Today we would plot the data, but again orthogonal graphs were not in general use in 1662. When Boyle’s data are plotted by using modern conventional methods, they strongly support his hypothesis that the volume and pressure of a gas are inversely related.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyer CB A history of mathematics. New York: Wiley; 1968.
Boyle R New experiments physico-mechanicall, touching the spring of the air, and its effects. Oxford: H. Hall for T. Robinson; 1660.
Boyle R New experiments physico-mechanical, touching the air: whereunto is added a defence of the authors explication of the experiments, against the obiections of Franciscus Linus, and, Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: H. Hall for T. Robinson; 1662.
Cajori F A history of mathematical notations. Chicago: Open Court; 1928.
Cohen IB Newton, Hooke, and ‘Boyle’s Law’. Nature. 1964;204:618–21.
Descartes R Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire sa raison chercher la verité dans les sciences. Leiden: Jan Maire; 1637.
Geary RC Accuracy of Boyle’s original observations on the pressure and volume of a gas. Nature. 1943;151:476.
Napier J Mirifici Logarithmorum Canonis Descriptio. Edinburgh: Andrew Hart; 1614.
Webster C Richard Towneley and Boyle’s law. Nature. 1963;197:226–8.
Webster C The discovery of Boyle’s law, and the concept of the elasticity of air in the seventeenth century. Arch Hist Exact Sci. 1965;2:441–502.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
For people whose arithmetic is rusty, here is the calculation keeping the vulgar fractions.
-
The original expression is (29 2/16 × 48)/38.
-
Converting the numbers inside the brackets to 16ths gives
-
(29 × 16 + 2) x 48 or 22368
-
Dividing this by 16 gives 1398.
-
Dividing this by 38 gives 36 + 30/38 or 36 15/19
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 American Physiological Society
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
B. West, J. (2015). The Original Presentation of Boyle’s Law. In: Essays on the History of Respiratory Physiology. Perspectives in Physiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2362-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2362-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2361-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2362-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)