Skip to main content

Stool DNA for Colorectal Cancer Screening: From Concepts to Quality Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Colorectal Cancer Screening

Abstract

Stool DNA testing is an emergent noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening approach with attractive biological and clinical features. A specific next-generation multi-target stool DNA test (Cologuard; Exact Sciences, Madison, WI) was recently shown to have excellent performance in a multicenter study of over 10,000 average-risk individuals. On the basis of these results, the automated and commercialized Cologuard test was approved simultaneously by the US Food and Drug Administration and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services on August 11, 2014. Informed by the validation data and rigorous regulatory approval process, we propose minimum standards for regulatory stringency, quality control, and test performance for future assessment of noninvasive CRC screening tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ACO:

Accountable care organization

CLIA:

Clinical Laboratory Improvement and Amendment

cm:

Centimeter

CMS:

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

DeeP-C:

Multi-target colorectal cancer screening test for the detection of colorectal advanced adenomatous polyps and cancer

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

FIT:

Fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin

IDE:

Investigational device exemption

MT-sDNA:

Multi-target stool DNA test

NCD:

National coverage decision

NCQA:

National Committee for Quality Assurance

PMA:

Premarket approval

QuARTS:

Quantitative allele-specific real-time target and signal amplification

sDNA:

Stool DNA

References

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(1):11–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, Ward E. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. [Review]. 2009;59(6):366–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(2):89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, Morikawa T, Liao X, Qian ZR, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1095–105. (Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu FI, van Niekerk de W, Owen D, Tha SP, Turbin DA, Webber DL. Longitudinal outcome study of sessile serrated adenomas of the colorectum: an increased risk for subsequent right-sided colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(7):927–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahlquist DA, Sargent DJ, Loprinzi CL, Levin TR, Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, et al. Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(7):441–50, W81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, van Oijen MG, Fockens P, van Krieken HH, et al. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(1):82–90. (Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morikawa T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, Wada R, Mitsushima T, Shiratori Y. A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(2):422–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heresbach D, Manfredi S, D'Halluin P N, Bretagne JF, Branger B. Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. [Meta-Analysis Review]. 2006;18(4):427–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover JM, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9726):1624–33. [Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Church T, Laiyemo AO, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(25):2345–57. (Comparative Study Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(3):230–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahi CJ, Hewett DG, Norton DL, Eckert GJ, Rex DK. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(1):42–6.( The Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. [Evaluation Studies].)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahlquist DA, Harrington JJ, Burgart LJ, Roche PC. Morphometric analysis of the “mucocellular layer” overlying colorectal cancer and normal mucosa: relevance to exfoliation and stool screening. Hum Pathol. 2000;31(1):51–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Turnbull BA, Ross ME. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2704–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zou H, Taylor WR, Harrington JJ, Hussain FT, Cao X, Loprinzi CL, et al. High detection rates of colorectal neoplasia by stool DNA testing with a novel digital melt curve assay. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(2):459–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zou H CX, Domenico M, Harrington J, Taylor W, Yab T, Ahlquist D, Lidgard G. Sensitive quantitation of methylated markers with a novel methylation-specific technology. Clin Chem. 2010;56:A199.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zou H, Harrington JJ, Klatt KK, Ahlquist DA. A sensitive method to quantify human long DNA in stool: relevance to colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1115–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahlquist DA, Zou H, Domanico M, Mahoney DW, Yab TC, Taylor WR, et al. Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(2):248–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lidgard GP, Domanico M, Bruinsma JJ, Gagrat ZD, Oldham-Haltom R, Fourrier KD, et al. An optimized multi-marker stool test for colorectal cancer screening: initial clinical appraisal. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(5, Suppl 1):S–770.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zou H, Allawi H, Cao X, Domanico M, Harrington J, Taylor WR, et al. Quantification of methylated markers with a multiplex methylation-specific technology. Clin Chem. 2012;58(2):375–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahlquist DA, Zou H, Domanico M, Mahoney DW, Yab TC, Taylor WR, et al. Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(2):248–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahlquist DA, Taylor WR, Mahoney DW, Zou H, Domanico M, Thibodeau SN, et al. The stool DNA test is more accurate than the plasma septin 9 test in detecting colorectal neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(3):272–7e1.( The Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. [Comparative Study Evaluation Studies Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lidgard GP, Domanico M, Bruinsma JJ, Gagrat ZD, Oldham-Haltom R, Fourrier KD, et al. Tu1189 an optimized multi-marker stool test for colorectal cancer screening: initial clinical appraisal. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(5, Supplement 1):S–770.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lidgard GP, Domanico MJ, Bruinsma JJ, Light J, Gagrat ZD, Oldham-Haltom RL, et al., editors. An optimized molecular stool test for colorectal cancer screening: evaluation of an automated analytic platform and logistic algorithm. AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2012; Anaheim, California.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lidgard GP, Domanico MJ, Bruinsma JJ, Light J, Gagrat ZD, Oldham-Haltom RL, et al. Clinical performance of an automated stool DNA assay for detection of colorectal neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(10):1313–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heigh RI, Yab TC, Taylor WR, Hussain FNT, Smyrk TC. Detectionof colorectal serrated polyps by stool DNA testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (FIT). PL. S One. 2014;9(1):e85659.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Levin TR, Lavin P, Lidgard GP, et al. Multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening: prospective, multicenter assessment and comparison with fecal immunochemical testing in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1287–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hackett JL, Gutman SI. Introduction to the food and drug administration (FDA) regulatory process. J Proteome Res. [Review]. 2005;4(4):1110–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Administration USFaD. Premarket Approval (PMA). 2012. http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/howtomarketyourdevice/premarketsubmissions/premarketapprovalpma/. Accessed: 20 Sept 2013.

  33. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chem. 2003;49(1):1–6. (Comment Consensus Development Conference Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schilling SH, Hjelmeland AB, Radiloff DR, Liu IM, Wakeman TP, Fielhauer JR, et al. NDRG4 is required for cell cycle progression and survival in glioblastoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(37):25160–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dai Z, Popkie AP, Zhu WG, Timmers CD, Raval A, Tannehill-Gregg S, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 3B silencing in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23(20):3521–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kisiel JB, Yab TC, Taylor WR, Chari ST, Petersen GM, Mahoney DW, et al. Stool DNA testing for the detection of pancreatic cancer: assessment of methylation marker candidates. Cancer. 2012;118(10):2623–31. (Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahlquist DA, Taylor WR, Yab TC, Devens ME, Mahoney DW, Boardman LA, et al. Aberrantlymethylated gene marker levels in stool: effect of demographic exposure, body mass, and other patient characteristics. J Mol Biomark Diagn. 2012;3(5):133.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM. American college of gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(3):739–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty RL. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology. 1987;93(5):1009–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN, Huitfeldt HS, Rognum T, Larsen S, et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut. 1996;39(3):449–56. (Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD, Hinshaw JL, Barlow D, Jensen D, et al. Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(8):711–20. (Multicenter Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Video-Audio Media).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Edge SBB DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kisiel JB, Ahlquist DA. Stool DNA screening for colorectal cancer: opportunities to improve value with next generation tests. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45(4):301–8. (Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Scully TA, Thompson TG. Medicare program; revised process for making medicare national coverage determinations. Federal Register. 2003;68(187):55634–41.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zauber AG L-VI, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing to screen for colorectal cancer: report to AHRQ and CMS from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) for MISCAN and SimCRC Models. 2007. https://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewtechassess.asp?where=index&tid=52. Accessed: 30 Oct 2009.

  46. Parekh M, Fendrick AM, Ladabaum U. As tests evolve and costs of cancer care rise: reappraising stool-based screening for colorectal neoplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27(8):697–12.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sharaf RN, Ladabaum U. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(1):120–32. (Comparative Study Evaluation Studies).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fisher ES, McClellan MB, Bertko J, Lieberman SM, Lee JJ, Lewis JL, et al. Fostering accountable health care: moving forward in medicare. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):w219–31. (Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(5):1570–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):129–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kisiel JB, Yab TC, Nazer Hussain FT, Taylor WR, Garrity-Park MM, Sandborn WJ, et al. Stool DNA testing for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(5):546–54. (Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Berndt C, Haubold K, Wenger F, Brux B, Muller J, Bendzko P, et al. K-ras mutations in stools and tissue samples from patients with malignant and nonmalignant pancreatic diseases. Clin Chem. 1998;44(10):2103–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zou H, Harrington JJ, Taylor WR, Devens ME, Cao X, Heigh RI, et al. T2036 pan-detection of gastrointestinal neoplasms by stool DNA testing: establishment of feasibility. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(5, Supplement 1):A–625.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Raimondo M, Yab TC, Mahoney DW, Taylor WR, Anderson KS, Ahlquist DA. Methylated DNA markers in pancreatic juice discriminate pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis and normal controls. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(5, Supplement 1):S–90.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kisiel JB, Taylor WR, Yab TC, Mahoney DW, Sun Z, Middha S, et al. 769 novel methylated DNA markers predict site of gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(5, Supplement 1):S–84.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kisiel JB, Ahlquist DA. Stool DNA testing for cancer surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease: an early view. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013;6(5):371–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Ahlquist .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahlquist, D., Kisiel, J. (2015). Stool DNA for Colorectal Cancer Screening: From Concepts to Quality Care. In: Shaukat, A., Allen, J. (eds) Colorectal Cancer Screening. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2333-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2333-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2332-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2333-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics